They work as a team.I think though the difference is, those of us here have discussed medical issues, testimony, have went round and round in circles on various topics, been researching information. We’ve went back again and again to review what was said and when (thanks tortoise), and personally I’ve been corrected more times than I care to admit when I’ve got things wrong or misremembered.
The jury have not been able to discuss things at all. They have not been allowed to take those iPads or notes home and review them. Every day they were listening to today’s testimony only, never getting a chance to review back on previous days, weeks, months.
It must be exceptionally hard for them. Such a long long time has passed. Especially when different things might stand out to each of them, different people remembering differing things.
I think they’d be able to sit together and discuss this for 6 months if they could.
Put it this way, I highly doubt any of them would be scoring 10/10 on Tortoise or Parker’s quizzes..
They represent collective wisdom.
They examine the evidence carefully and thoroughly.
These 12 people consider 12 viewpoints and arguments, there is (allegedly) a wide variety of demographics, life experiences, and opinions.
Team work increases accuracy because there are more memories and notes on which to rely.
Social science studies support that 12-person juries are more likely to recall facts and trial testimony correctly.
As a group, they have good recall and are accurate, so they are likely to get the verdict right.
And if we as Internet posters are involved in this case, they surely are involved 100 times more than we are.
JMO
Last edited: