- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 28,923
- Reaction score
- 206,452
The defence isn't proposing that the equipment was faulty. I think they will have considered every possible defence to these charges.How does that answer the question?
You proposed that it might have been a faulty machine, that was forcing air into the babies lines, killing them.
So I asked if that faulty machine continued to do so after LL left the Neo-natal unit?
If not, then there was not ample reason to believe this was due to a faulty machine, imo.
If they're not suggesting it as a possibility in any of the collapses and/or deaths, which happened in different rooms and different cots, and didn't happen to other babies on dates in between, it's a flawed theory, IMO.