UK - Prince Andrew accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999 - 2002

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #921
  • #922
  • #923
CoverMeCagney said:
The Daily Mail is one step up from a comic. Look out for articles that have quotes from “an unnamed source”, “a source close to..” etc etc, and cross check against more reputable news outlets like the BBC/ITV/Reuters. Hope that helps.
Click to expand...
So true
But they do get the best photos.
IMO

I like to stick to the facts also, as we do here in WS
But, I do enjoy the photos, JMO
 
  • #924
CP244 said:
She will not cut him out of his inheritance of her personal wealth.
Click to expand...
I think his late father also left him something.
 
  • #925
Besides, hiring high profile aggressive lawyers blew in his face.
The case, instead of being resolved quietly, exploded spectacularly.
What exactly have they won?
Nothing!
And the whole world is watching.
And other perps are forgotten in this debacle.
 
  • #926
Dotta said:
Besides, hiring high profile aggressive lawyers blew in his face.
The case, instead of being resolved quietly, exploded spectacularly.
What exactly have they won?
Nothing!
And the whole world is watching.
And other perps are forgotten in this debacle.
Click to expand...
Agree.

But have to question…could GM no longer objecting to other identities be to try to divert some of this attention away from PA? Just something that crossed my mind.

Ghislaine Maxwell will no longer fight to keep names of 8 'John Does' secret

A lawyer for Maxwell stated in a letter to federal Judge Loretta Preska this week that she would no longer object to the identities of the “John Does” in a 2015 civil lawsuit brought against Maxwell by Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre.

“After careful review of the detailed objections submitted by Non-Party Does 17, 53, 54, 55, 73, 93, and 151, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell writes to inform the Court that she does not wish to further address those objections,” said the Jan. 12 letter, signed by Laura Menninger.

The letter was written the same day that a Manhattan federal court judge refused to dismiss Giuffre’s caseagainst Prince Andrew.
 
  • #927
BUF said:
Agree.

But have to question…could GM no longer objecting to other identities be to try to divert some of this attention away from PA? Just something that crossed my mind.

Ghislaine Maxwell will no longer fight to keep names of 8 'John Does' secret

A lawyer for Maxwell stated in a letter to federal Judge Loretta Preska this week that she would no longer object to the identities of the “John Does” in a 2015 civil lawsuit brought against Maxwell by Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre.

“After careful review of the detailed objections submitted by Non-Party Does 17, 53, 54, 55, 73, 93, and 151, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell writes to inform the Court that she does not wish to further address those objections,” said the Jan. 12 letter, signed by Laura Menninger.
Click to expand...

I am thinking he must be one of those John Does? moo.
 
  • #928
In his ruling that a child sexual abuse lawsuit against Prince Andrew can move ahead, Judge Lewis Kaplan took several pages to flatly reject the royal's argument that the law undergirding the entire case is unconstitutional.

"Defendant is not the first litigant to advance this argument, which has been rejected by every New York state and federal court to have encountered it," the federal judge wrote in the 46-page decision. "And it has been rejected repeatedly for good reason."
The concise rejection represents a clear message from the courts: The Child Victims Act, the basis for Virginia Giuffre's lawsuit against Prince Andrew, is here to stay.

The ruling against Prince Andrew is another win for the Child Victims Act's lookback window, experts say - CNN
 
  • #929
Dotta said:
Besides, hiring high profile aggressive lawyers blew in his face.
The case, instead of being resolved quietly, exploded spectacularly.
What exactly have they won?
Nothing!
And the whole world is watching.
And other perps are forgotten in this debacle.
Click to expand...
The other perps should not be forgotten. Their names must be reported and repeated, and reported again.
 
  • #930
wrong thread
 
  • #931
  • #932
  • #933
Chelly said:
The other perps should not be forgotten. Their names must be reported and repeated, and reported again.
Click to expand...

Yep, this thing needs blowing wide apart. From reading things I won’t repeat here, Andrew is nowhere near being the worst offender in this sordid story. Nor the most famous.
 
  • #934
  • #935
  • #936
Spartygirl said:
Oh.. booo hoo... cry me a river.

On a side note.. He wasn't too sad to throw/host a party, was he?
A shooting party, none the less.

Target practice, anyone ???
JMO
Click to expand...
A hunter to boot:(
Ugh!
 
Last edited:
  • #937
CoverMeCagney said:
Yep, this thing needs blowing wide apart. From reading things I won’t repeat here, Andrew is nowhere near being the worst offender in this sordid story. Nor the most famous.
Click to expand...

Very true. But, perhaps PA is low hanging fruit? Easy to get, and maybe not quite as hazardous to reach.
 
  • #938
mickey2942 said:
Very true. But, perhaps PA is low hanging fruit? Easy to get, and maybe not quite as hazardous to reach.
Click to expand...

Not locked in to legally binding American NDA contracts, probably. And/or not already paid it off.
 
  • #939
  • #940
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

zwiebel
UK - Prince Andrew accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2
44 45 46
Replies
916
Views
72K
sds71
sds71

Members online

... and 126 more.
Total: 1,700 (members: 127, guests: 1,573)

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
1,573
Total visitors
1,700
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
633,397
Messages
18,641,310
Members
243,517
Latest member
Dossier NZ
Back
Top