I doubt there are any grounds for appeal.Unfortunately I do see malik and possibly the other two attempting appeals
I doubt there are any grounds for appeal.Unfortunately I do see malik and possibly the other two attempting appeals
'Sadistic motivations' would mean that they took pleasure/got a thrill from inflicting pain on Sara, and to be honest, there are elements that do seem to suggest something other than anger managment issues going on. The iron to the buttocks and bites to the thighs might be suggestive of sadism. The judge seems not to have been convinced, though.If years of sustained torture isn't sadistic I don't know what is.
The only real justice would be for US and BB to be subjected to exactly the same treatment as they inflicted on Sara.
and in N's case the mother who had also let them down according to reportsPoor kids.
Stuck between grandfather who raised 2 murdering / murder-enabling sons , Surrey Social Services who ignored all available evidence and placed Sara with murderers.
I'm in no doubt the father got pleasure from it. Why else would he do it? This was not down to loss of temper, and there was no genuine cause for punishment. It's the only explanation.'Sadistic motivations' would mean that they took pleasure/got a thrill from inflicting pain on Sara, and to be honest, there are elements that do seem to suggest something other than anger managment issues going on. The iron to the buttocks and bites to the thighs might be suggestive of sadism. The judge seems not to have been convinced, though.
Imo they have been one of the best covering this.I don't think there's anything new here, I am posting the link for completeness, after all the Dragon's service.
We all agree on that, I think - for consistency in keeping on reporting every day. I don't know if you saw the link I posted on the first page of this thread:Imo they have been one of the best covering this.
We all agree on that, I think - for consistency in keeping on reporting every day. I don't know if you saw the link I posted on the first page of this thread:
![]()
‘Glimmer of hope’ for local news as Surrey publication given charitable status
Guildford Dragon will be able to benefit from tax breaks after becoming UK’s first charitable public interest news providerwww.theguardian.com
No I did not see that. So it is a charity site rather than proper newspaper which makes it all the more remarkable tbhWe all agree on that, I think - for consistency in keeping on reporting every day. I don't know if you saw the link I posted on the first page of this thread:
![]()
‘Glimmer of hope’ for local news as Surrey publication given charitable status
Guildford Dragon will be able to benefit from tax breaks after becoming UK’s first charitable public interest news providerwww.theguardian.com
I think we could say it's a proper digital local newspaper that's been granted the status of a charity to keep it going financially. Local papers are in sharp decline and few do proper court reports these days.No I did not see that. So it is a charity site rather than proper newspaper which makes it all the more remarkable tbh
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.