It’s interesting how we all see something different. It really looks as though she’s holding a phone to me.
Agreed...and if you look at a good enough quality pic can actually see the phone itself , dark colour ..purple or black imo .
It’s interesting how we all see something different. It really looks as though she’s holding a phone to me.
New to websleuths, I live near Clarence Avenue and often take this route so strikes very close to home.
There was a lot of police presence today around the Oaklands estate, on the north side of Poynders Road by the junction with Cavendish. It actually makes more sense as the road is laid out for her to walk on the north rather than the south. Sniffer dogs and what looked like senior police) I overhead snippets of their convos) on the estate. There are gardens set in front and the estate as a whole feels pretty sketchy. It would make more sense that something happened here than Agnes Riley which as I understand is shut at night.
You could be right - I just thought her fingers seemed like they were holding something but I didn't look very closely.
New to websleuths, I live near Clarence Avenue and often take this route so strikes very close to home.
There was a lot of police presence today around the Oaklands estate, on the north side of Poynders Road by the junction with Cavendish. It actually makes more sense as the road is laid out for her to walk on the north rather than the south. Sniffer dogs and what looked like senior police) I overhead snippets of their convos) on the estate. There are gardens set in front and the estate as a whole feels pretty sketchy. It would make more sense that something happened here than Agnes Riley which as I understand is shut at night.
I agree because a) I hold my phone like that and b) I can’t think what the black shape just above her fingers is if it isn’t a phone...?Agreed...and if you look at a good enough quality pic can actually see the phone itself .
So I’ve been looking back over the traffic cameras and tying up the ones in the vicinity that have been greyed out post 9.30pm on wed 3rd and into Thursday 4th up to midnight. I have attached a little picture - the pink dots show the camera stills that are greyed out with similar timings. May be nothing but may give a clue as to where they think the perp may have gone (in a vehicle obvs) - I haven’t got much further than that at the moment
It was earlier in the day. Not relevant in my opinion.Do we know what time that CCTV image was taken? I may have missed a bit - is the phone / not phone debate relevant to the time?
So I’ve been looking back over the traffic cameras and tying up the ones in the vicinity that have been greyed out post 9.30pm on wed 3rd and into Thursday 4th up to midnight. I have attached a little picture - the pink dots show the camera stills that are greyed out with similar timings. May be nothing but may give a clue as to where they think the perp may have gone (in a vehicle obvs) - I haven’t got much further than that at the moment
It’s interesting how we all see something different. It really looks as though she’s holding a phone to me.
Do you have timings you got lay on top? Would be interesting if a potential route can be plotted...
So very likely she was forced into the car/van?Further to the update mentioned above. From BBC London
“Sarah Everard latest: DCI Goodwin (OIC) says @metpoliceuk knocking on doors and have spoken to over 750 people & reviewed hours of CCTV. They want dashcam footage - were you in Poynders Rd, 9pm on Wednesday? “
In that photo she also has a mask on. Maybe she took headphones off to wear or fit the mask on properly then subsequently uses the phone in her hand a result. That is how I would hold a phone...just a guess and my interpretation of the pictureIn regards to the headphones - When she enters the shop on CCTV she appears to be holding the phone to her ear - So perhaps she prefers to have her phone to her face?
Do we know what time that CCTV image was taken? I may have missed a bit - is the phone / not phone debate relevant to the time?