- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
- Messages
- 13,030
- Reaction score
- 35,037
I think this is what had stunned so many...the fact that on a busy London main road/bus route this could actually happen![]()
Absolutely. And that no one saw anything that stood out to them.
I think this is what had stunned so many...the fact that on a busy London main road/bus route this could actually happen![]()
Found it:
'His charge sheet alleges he "unlawfully and by force took or carried away Sarah Everard against her will".' - it's from the Daily Mirror's account of court proceedings today. The fact it's in quotation marks suggests it's a direct transcription of the charge sheet. As a reminder, UK definition of kidnap is "to take by force or by fraud" - the fact the charge sheet specifically states she was taken "by force" seems to me to rule out that she was taken by fraud - ie, she wasn't coerced or tricked into getting into the car - she was physically forced into it.
This makes sense to me. He's a bulky, muscular guy, and she's a slight woman - he'd have no need to come up with some detailed plan about how to convince her to get in the car - much easier, and quicker, just to physically force her in there. As someone else has pointed out, it'd be over in seconds. As they say, the simplest explanations are usually the correct ones.
To me that fully answers the question of how she got in the car - he put her there.
Link: Police officer accused of abducting and murdering Sarah Everard appears in court
True, but if he threatened her with a knife or some other weapon she may have just cooperated.
Sorry to hear that LL, you’ve been an absolute star with all this and it’s been greatly appreciated. Sending you a massive virtual hug xxWell thank you, I appreciate it x
I lost someone very very close and dear to me from covid, its all still a bit raw, so really haven't been interested in ambulances or shouting neighbours, it's been a struggle, but I'm getting there, just wished I had set up security cams, kicking myself over it(had them at old place, didn't think I'd need them here) - I set them all up when this broke, so I'm safe lol xx
I think as a matter of law, she could have got into the car voluntarily (eg for a lift home (not saying this happened)) but he drives past her area, she asks him to stop, he doesn’t, I think that at that point the criminal act starts - the “force” element would be the use of a car the victim can’t escape from. In my view, Just because a victim does one voluntary act, doesn’t mean that the criminal act can’t start at another related point.
They likely know her cause of death but have chose not to make it public.
So, who do you think is taking them? Doesn't someone have to live there to take them? Why not LL?those photos could just as easily be from a communal landing on the flats opposite you know...
just a thought
I think someone earlier speculated that it's likely he would have pulled up behind her which may be a bit harder to notice, I'm not really sureI can tell you right now that is not always the case. In strange scenarios your instincts don't always immediately kick in - you may be baffled as to why the car has stopped so suddenly and that's all your assailant needs. I doubt Sarah was expecting this to happen and so she may have been startled and her instinct to run delayed.
yes unmarked police cars do have flashing lights and are usually switched on when following a dangerous driver, and in my experience tend to be dark cars JMO
Just on google maps, that’s all, on the opposite side of the roadWhich photos
I can't believe what I am seeing at the vigil
It's almost as if the Met want to confirm every negative stereotype about this case.
I’ve just googled the road and there do seem to be many buildings opposite which have communal halls and stairways. This does make me uncomfortable...
One of the journalists (bylines in Mirror, Metro and Gay Star, but not a verified account) in court today tweeted that much was said that they're not allowed to report at present, but that what was alleged, what the press heard, was "scary". MOO but it may be that the police know cause of death, but that it can't be reported right now. He later linked to this guide from the BBC which explains what can and cannot be reported from these types of hearings, and why. Contempt and reporting restrictions - BBC AcademyThey likely know her cause of death but have chose not to make it public.
I think as a matter of law, she could have got into the car voluntarily (eg for a lift home (not saying this happened)) but he drives past her area, she asks him to stop, he doesn’t, I think that at that point the criminal act starts - the “force” element would be the use of a car the victim can’t escape from. In my view, Just because a victim does one voluntary act, doesn’t mean that the criminal act can’t start at another related point.
I honestly feel sorry for his wife and their families in general, especially if she is innocent in all of this
I dont think anyone is saying he had reasonable cause to believe she was breaking any law... more suggesting that he used it as an excuse to initiate interaction with victim.Why would an officer believe she was breaking a rule in this instance?