It's behind portaloo, sticking out on left side, piece of wood over top as before, why wasn't it removed?
They obviously haven’t highlighted it as a item of interest.
Edited due to my tired mind
It's behind portaloo, sticking out on left side, piece of wood over top as before, why wasn't it removed?
It was said in court she was taken by force didn't it? I think he maybe tried to strike up a conversation (maybe as it has been suggested by producing his warrent card) but then maybe she was having none if it and he resorted to just forcing her in.
I am local to the Clapham / Brixton area and have been doing a lot of thinking about how SE could have ended up in the car. I have walked, driven and cycled up that road numerous times so something that was troubling me was the accused’s ability to stop in a single lane of traffic with both car doors open for an extended period of time. There is enough regular traffic even at night to draw a lot of attention to something like that, especially with hazards on. I was having another look at where the forensics team were focused and the surroundings of Poynders Court. There is a small road that forms a U around the back of Poynders Court with an entry and exit that then comes back onto the main road (the curb is dipped here to make it easier to re-enter). Is it possible the accused went round the back and then actually stopped on the pavement itself (at a 90 degree angle to the direction of the road)? This wouldn’t disrupt traffic and having two front doors open would block the view from the road. He could have either seen SE as he was driving along and went ahead or used this spot as a vantage / watching point as he could have stayed quite far back off the pavement and moved forward easily if needed. The railing and area of curb there was a lot of forensic attention on would also be on the passenger side of the car so would make sense if there was a scuffle on that side. I’m not sure yet how much of the kidnapping included force or coercion but IMO the positioning of the car like this would make sense. JMO
Police cordon off flats in search for missing woman Sarah Everard
I am local to the Clapham / Brixton area and have been doing a lot of thinking about how SE could have ended up in the car. I have walked, driven and cycled up that road numerous times so something that was troubling me was the accused’s ability to stop in a single lane of traffic with both car doors open for an extended period of time. There is enough regular traffic even at night to draw a lot of attention to something like that, especially with hazards on. I was having another look at where the forensics team were focused and the surroundings of Poynders Court. There is a small road that forms a U around the back of Poynders Court with an entry and exit that then comes back onto the main road (the curb is dipped here to make it easier to re-enter). Is it possible the accused went round the back and then actually stopped on the pavement itself (at a 90 degree angle to the direction of the road)? This wouldn’t disrupt traffic and having two front doors open would block the view from the road. He could have either seen SE as he was driving along and went ahead or used this spot as a vantage / watching point as he could have stayed quite far back off the pavement and moved forward easily if needed. The railing and area of curb there was a lot of forensic attention on would also be on the passenger side of the car so would make sense if there was a scuffle on that side. I’m not sure yet how much of the kidnapping included force or coercion but IMO the positioning of the car like this would make sense. JMO
Police cordon off flats in search for missing woman Sarah Everard
With all the discussion regarding the abduction I thought it would be worth mentioning the case of Joseph McCann - he was able to kidnap a number of women, some even during the day. His MO was threatening the women with a knife.
Joseph McCann trial: ‘serial rapist’ targeted victims aged 11 to 71, court told
Yes - I was thinking along these lines. The car has been stopped off the main carriageway; 2 figures are spotted (not necessarily together - her still walking/perp “lurking” somewhere but also semi-discreetly, still visible as headlights of other vehicles/buses go past so spotted on cctv). In any event I wouldn’t be surprised if whatever happened wasn’t actually caught, but the proximity of these figures, one certainly being her, followed by her absence from any kind of cctv after the event means that even without spotting them together, chances are the owner of the car would have to have been the last person to see her. And i imagine this could all have happened in under 2/3 minutes or perhaps even less. (Not the busiest of bus routes at 9.30pm, and despite lockdown there are still a fair few cabs about it maybe not as many as usual). I think it all happened v quickly - but whether or not the whole event was captured on CCTV is irrelevant. Circumstantial evidence creates a pretty good idea of a chain of events. There may not be anything found at the Poynders Road site - but since it was her last observable location they needed to send forensics there to see what, if anything they could find. It was clear LE were mostly focussing on the pavement/road area out front, and later the grassy railing-ed in corner covered by trees.
What it is a salutary lesson in through is either seeing things with your own eyes or waiting for police confirmation of events. I had friends living locally who were frantically whatsapping that eg boyfriend of a friend saw them recover a body. Apart from the fact it would never have been recovered from the crime scene that quickly so I immediately doubted it, some people are way too quick to jump the gun on social media (myself included). Same goes for the massive police presence at Great Chart - there was a lot of chatter about the amount of resource, police mobile indecent cabins being wheeled in implying some sort of massive investigation. Hindsight suggests that while it was a large and complex area, LE needed a lot of boots in the ground, plus Covid restrictions probably mean they doubled up on vehicles/offices or something to ensure a Covid safe working environment.
RSBM
the court heard that a bus camera captured two figures on Poynders Road and a white Vauxhall Astra with its hazard lights flashing.
Sarah Everard's body was found in builder's bag and identified with dental records, court hears
It doesn't say the camera caught 2 figures by the car.
Just re the suspect's wife: rather than speculating about any involvement, however slight, I'm looking at it in terms of what the police *needed,* They have a high-profile case involving one of their own. They can't leave any stone unturned. They will need to interview the wife asap. They need free rein of the house. If they immediately arrest the wife "on suspicion" they can take her to a formal interview, the house is clear, and they have double leverage. Leverage on her via threat of charges. Leverage on him via concen for his wife & also being able to hint she's giving valuable information and to cut off his denials.
I believe the arrest was tactical and not keyed to any actual information they already had about what she knew or did. I believe they're simply continuing the pressure by keeping potential charges hanging over her head.
If he uses his warrant card surely he'd realise he's more likely to get caught if she lives and can remember anything from it? If he's used his actual warrant card I can't see a scenario where she was going to come out of it alive sadly.
And a helicopter by the sounds of it xAnother truck arriving x
Just going through pics of when it snowed here, it was definitely there at least 10th feb xView attachment 288847
I live in the immediate area xxForgive me for asking, but how do you have a pic of the house from Feb...!?
Keep your internet eyes out for ....
"A source said a flatbed truck ........... It is thought possibly maybe that ........."![]()
Could whoever did this/driver of that car have pulled up onto the pavement, perhaps just ahead of her but crucially off the main road so as not to be stopped in fairly busy, flowing traffic. Puts hazards on, winds down window to do whatever nasty “thing” he was going to do. Very much with the intention he gets spotted. This is what is looking to get his “kick” out of. At that moment her preservation instinct kicks in; she either
a) freezes
b) goes to run away
c) shouts something at him
But perhaps at some point, her instinctive safety thing is to take out her phone.
At this instant HIS instinct kicks in. If it was a flasher/IE incident was maybe hoping for just a scared reflex from her and that would be the end of it. But her reaction wasn’t the extremely “precise” reaction he had expected in his head. So acting on his own instincts now he is only thinking literally moments ahead and dealing with the here and now. He throws open his car door so chase her. There is a scuffle. He bundles her into the other car door and drives off.
I can’t add quotes for some reason but someone has mentioned they would have complied.
I wouldn’t have. Especially not to a man who is on his own in an unmarked car. My instant thought would be he has stolen the badge or something.
I just would not willingly get inside the car.
I’ve seen friends of hers mention how kind she was. I’m wondering if he duped her into thinking he needed help with something. But even then, why would get get into the car?!
I suppose everyone is different and some of us would comply, others wouldn’t.