UK UK - Sarah Everard, 33, London - Clapham Common area, 3 March 2021 *Arrests* #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #901
I'm really wondering the same thing, especially as they have just extended his detention and still not charged him. It's extremely worrying.

A judge has to approve these extensions each time though, and a judge would only do that where it looks like the police are onto something.
 
  • #902
I am hoping that this is LE doing things by the book and investigating the reason WC wasn’t suspended sooner following the 28 Feb complaint which may have prevented WC from being in London on 3 Mar. I’m hoping that the 28 Feb incident wasn’t immediately identified as WC and the wording of the statement/probe is standard procedure to see, having now with hindsight/more evidence realised it is likely/certainly WC responsible for the 28 Feb incident, IF more could have been done to prevent WC being in London on 3 March.

In other words: the two officers handling the complaint may not have done anything wrong but, given the likely perp of it is now highly suspected of going on to commit another crime, an investigation has been set up to verify that.

I hope. If they’ve knowingly left him out on duty, they’re done.
 
  • #903
You have got to suspect (esp given what he did to himself in the cells today) that WC threatened or carried out some kind of self harm at home (when ambulance was called). Date would seem to fit with the time he was caught exposing himself. JKO MOO
 
  • #904
I'm really wondering the same thing, especially as they have just extended his detention and still not charged him. It's extremely worrying.

A judge has to approve these extensions each time though, and a judge would only do that where it looks like the police are onto something.
 
  • #905
I think a more likely Avenue would have been to get his car registration from wherever he was parked near the takeaway, and trace him from that.

No guarantees, of course, but if the Sun report is accurate and they literally didn’t investigate at all, then it stands to reason that *actually investigating* would have greatly increased the chances of him being apprehended.

He’ll have known how little of a F is given about these types of crimes, and how little work is done to solve them. That’s why he was able to be so brazen about it, and probably for quite some time. JMO
 
Last edited:
  • #906
There are a lot more fast food places in South London than just McDonald's! When I lived there I spent half of my life in various chicken shops and hardly ever set foot in a McDonald's or KFC so it could also be a location like that. Just my thoughts.
 
  • #907
Perhaps rose-tinted glasses but I struggle to believe they knew WC was the person in question and did nothing about it. I very much hope so.

I think it's more likely that the matter wasn't taken seriously. These types of incidents are not uncommon, around 100 (reported) a year in both Lambeth and Wandsworth. They're lucky if 10% are proceeded against. If the perp is unidentifiable or unknown to the local police force there's not an awful lot to go on in a city not short on crime.

Should these types of crimes be taken more seriously? Yes. But that needs a concerted effort to properly fund the police and for the public to make their voices heard on these matters - genuine activism that is about building not demolishing. Cuts have seriously impacted the ability of the police to do their job effectively, and (at the risk of getting political) militant activism that paints them as the enemy is wholly unhelpful. Trust is a two-way street and it needs to be rebuilt on both sides. Destroying one side of the street helps no one.
 
  • #908
Perhaps rose-tinted glasses but I struggle to believe they knew WC was the person in question and did nothing about it. I very much hope so.

I think it's more likely that the matter wasn't taken seriously. These types of incidents are not uncommon, around 100 (reported) a year in both Lambeth and Wandsworth. They're lucky if 10% are proceeded against. If the perp is unidentifiable or unknown to the local police force there's not an awful lot to go on in a city not short on crime.

Should these types of crimes be taken more seriously? Yes. But that needs a concerted effort to properly fund the police and for the public to make their voices heard on these matters - genuine activism that is about building not demolishing. Cuts have seriously impacted the ability of the police to do their job effectively, and (at the risk of getting political) militant activism that paints them as the enemy is wholly unhelpful. Trust is a two-way street and it needs to be rebuilt on both sides. Destroying one side of the street helps no one.
 
  • #909
Is this not the same as Maxine Carrr though? It's perverting the course of justice. Was she bailed? I find that hard to believe.
No, absolutely not the same as Maxine Carr. Maxine actually cleaned the murder scene.
 
  • #910
My thinking he can’t have confessed because surely they would have charged him already with a confession?
If he’s still trying to claim he’s innocent, smashing his head against the wall in the cell would be an odd move.
 
  • #911
  • #912
McDonald’s doesn’t have in person takeaway at the moment. Delivery or drive through. I suppose he could have exposed himself to the drive through person though.
Brixton is open for in person takeaway
 
  • #913
Possibility that he was angered by IE victim reporting and causing problems for him with work and wife and he was holding onto this anger until he found another woman to take it out on.

I have two questions:

Would WC definitely have known that the IE incident had been reported, and, if so, would he have been able to find out who reported it?
 
  • #914
My thinking he can’t have confessed because surely they would have charged him already with a confession?

Not necessarily no. They will want to question for as long as possible to gather as much information as they can. Especially if he's shown a pattern of behaviour - how many other crimes could they potentially unearth...
 
  • #915
It could be the case that WC is laying the groundwork for claims that he's not criminally responsible.

.
No. Too late for that. In addition, if the head injury was self inflicted (and we dont know that for a fact), he would have been assessed by the Mental Health Team before release.
 
  • #916
A kebab restaurant is still a fast food restaurant FYI.

It’s extremely unlikely they would have recognised him. The Met is like 30 thousand people!

Maybe it’s a northern thing, but it would be unusual to refer to a kebab place as a takeaway restaurant IMO. A kebab shop, a kebab house .. but ‘takeaway restaurant’ to me implies something different to a small pizza / chip / kebab shop - which is why I thought of McDs. It could mean any restaurant offering takeaway food obviously.
 
  • #917
The Chillenden Murders. Lin and Megan Russell. Happened in Kent 20 odd years ago.

The heroin addict in prison has always protested his innocence.

Wayne Couzens hunting ground?

totally different MO, think it highly unlikely for that to have been WC plus I believe they have the right person for that crime a lot of murderers protest their innocence doesn't mean they are so.
 
  • #918
This has all the hallmarks of the Met protecting their guy. Rinse and repeat behaviour.

MOO
I'm not sure what qualifies you to say this. I can't imagine any scenario where the Met wants to protect an officer guilty of flashing in this manner.
 
  • #919
Yay WS have put money I the meter
 
  • #920
So once his photo was released to the public, was that when the fast food staff recognised him and told the police it was him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
71
Guests online
3,111
Total visitors
3,182

Forum statistics

Threads
632,659
Messages
18,629,802
Members
243,238
Latest member
talu
Back
Top