UK UK - Sarah Wellgreen, 46, Kent, 9 Oct 2018 #2 *B. Lacomba guilty*

  • #561
Agree. I think it more likely to be, as Mrazda said, a glass of water on the bedside table. BL was hardly going to put a light on when he went into her bedroom, so he could have knocked this over.
IMO either bl or s knocked a glass of water over in the struggle or rush , bl grabs the top from in one of her drawers to soak it up and it ends up in the garage
 
  • #562
We get 'animal noises' in the night sometimes where I live. Sometimes it sounds like (seriously) some poor animal is getting totally murdered and mutilated. Going out there would be the last thing I'd want to get caught up in. Some of those night animals are danged scary. jmo.
If it was your own pet you thought outside you would go and look. I don't know many people randomly go outside after hearing animal noises and then they must of been pretty loud to wake bl up and get him out the house
 
  • #563
If it was your own pet you thought outside you would go and look. I don't know many people randomly go outside after hearing animal noises and then they must of been pretty loud to wake bl up and get him out the house
Not to mention that the child would've heard the noise too. How long was BL outside looking for the animal noises? Must've been awhile..

Also, just occurred to me.. BL was saying this happened the night before when the 'occupant' said he woke up to find no parents in their respective beds.. so on the night before, where was SW?
 
  • #564
Not to mention that the child would've heard the noise too. How long was BL outside looking for the animal noises? Must've been awhile..

Also, just occurred to me.. BL was saying this happened the night before when the 'occupant' said he woke up to find no parents in their respective beds.. so on the night before, where was SW?

BBM

AND if BL was outside for a while, investigating his animal noises, did the CCTV from no.23 pick him up? Or show Sarah leaving and coming home? Or even the animal(s) that were making the noise-that-only-he-heard?
 
  • #565
IMO either bl or s knocked a glass of water over in the struggle or rush , bl grabs the top from in one of her drawers to soak it up and it ends up in the garage


Yes! I could absolutely buy that scenario ...
 
  • #566
Also, just occurred to me.. BL was saying this happened the night before when the 'occupant' said he woke up to find no parents in their respective beds.. so on the night before, where was SW?

RSBM - Yes! This was exactly the thing going through my head all day yesterday.

Either the kid woke up 2 nights in a row - Ben coming in from investigating animals 8/9 and mum not in wet bed 9/10 OR kid woke up 8/9 only and then where the heck was Sarah? Not with Ben investigating animals and not in her wet bed ...
 
  • #567
RSBM - Yes! This was exactly the thing going through my head all day yesterday.

Either the kid woke up 2 nights in a row - Ben coming in from investigating animals 8/9 and mum not in wet bed 9/10 OR kid woke up 8/9 only and then where the heck was Sarah? Not with Ben investigating animals and not in her wet bed ...
Yes, if this could have been elaborated on some more, it would certainly have been helpful to his case, I would think?
 
  • #568
Another thing I wondered about.. I'm not sure if you guys have 'cable tv' over there, or if so, whether or not the people at 22 Bazes Shaw subscribe to it, but I wondered if the 'occupant' said they were up in the night when neither of the adults were in their beds nor inside the home, would the cable provider have been able to state the times during the middle of the night when someone in the home was watching cable tv or at least had it turned on?
 
  • #569
If it was your own pet you thought outside you would go and look. I don't know many people randomly go outside after hearing animal noises and then they must of been pretty loud to wake bl up and get him out the house
Yes, and one might surmise that other neighbours would have heard these animal noises as well, and could have testified to that, if they'd been questioned. imo.
 
  • #570
Hey guys... long time reader, first time poster :cool:

I’ve been following this case from the beginning with a very open mind, but now I’m praying the jury see it the way I think most of us do.

the question they have to answer first seems really simple to me... Is Sarah Wellgreen dead?

100%. to be alive she’d have needed to sneak off without being noticed by any cameras, no other cars were there, no money, no phone, no passport. Not even James Bond would get away that easily... the defence case is almost like suggesting she disappeared in the darkness and fled via helicopter with her mysterious rich lover. for me question 1 is a formality.

One thing really getting me is when he answers questions he refers to her as Sarah Wellgreen, is this the reporters writing? Or his actual words? Because that freaks me out...
 
  • #571
Hey guys... long time reader, first time poster :cool:

I’ve been following this case from the beginning with a very open mind, but now I’m praying the jury see it the way I think most of us do.

the question they have to answer first seems really simple to me... Is Sarah Wellgreen dead?

100%. to be alive she’d have needed to sneak off without being noticed by any cameras, no other cars were there, no money, no phone, no passport. Not even James Bond would get away that easily... the defence case is almost like suggesting she disappeared in the darkness and fled via helicopter with her mysterious rich lover. for me question 1 is a formality.

One thing really getting me is when he answers questions he refers to her as Sarah Wellgreen, is this the reporters writing? Or his actual words? Because that freaks me out...


Welcome! :)

I've been here for years and, I'm always frustrated by the trial reporting.

I would 'think' that he just says 'Sarah' ... but, who knows! Maybe we could ask the journalists? We've emailed & tweeted for other cases and had a good response.

In court, they might say 1000 words but, we rely on a journalist's tweet/inch in print to condense all that's said into one short sentence AND I think they often 'dumb down' what's been said as they assume readers won't understand (my own opinion)
 
  • #572
Does anyone feel we will get answers on Monday ?
 
  • #573
Does anyone feel we will get answers on Monday ?

Ooooh I wish! But, I think that's a little soon ... especially with having such a break, they'll need to get back into the swing of it ...

Personally, I am absolutely itching to know what was in the 2 jurors packs that shouldn't have been!?

Was it related to the case or not I wonder?
 
  • #574
Ooooh I wish! But, I think that's a little soon ... especially with having such a break, they'll need to get back into the swing of it ...

Personally, I am absolutely itching to know what was in the 2 jurors packs that shouldn't have been!?

Was it related to the case or not I wonder?

I must of missed that about the jurors packs!! Wonder what that could of been ??
 
  • #575
BBM

AND if BL was outside for a while, investigating his animal noises, did the CCTV from no.23 pick him up? Or show Sarah leaving and coming home? Or even the animal(s) that were making the noise-that-only-he-heard?

infront of BL house is a huge wooded area and huge field area... I’m from the same area we have noises all the time from foxes owls and Christ knows what else :) if he was to go to the wooded area to investigate he should of been picked up on the neighbours camera unless he went to the back of his house again wooded area but no cameras that I’m aware towards the road
 
  • #576
Hey guys... long time reader, first time poster :cool:

I’ve been following this case from the beginning with a very open mind, but now I’m praying the jury see it the way I think most of us do.

the question they have to answer first seems really simple to me... Is Sarah Wellgreen dead?

100%. to be alive she’d have needed to sneak off without being noticed by any cameras, no other cars were there, no money, no phone, no passport. Not even James Bond would get away that easily... the defence case is almost like suggesting she disappeared in the darkness and fled via helicopter with her mysterious rich lover. for me question 1 is a formality.

One thing really getting me is when he answers questions he refers to her as Sarah Wellgreen, is this the reporters writing? Or his actual words? Because that freaks me out...

Welcome Chambo, with your first post.:):)
BL continually refers to her with her full name, throughout the hearing.
This sounds so cold, distant, not someone you know well, as if trying to distance himself, from the situation.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
  • #577
Welcome Chambo, with your first post.:):)
BL continually refers to her with her full name, throughout the hearing.
This sounds so cold, distant, not someone you know well, as if trying to distance himself, from the situation.:rolleyes::rolleyes:

This is exactly what I was thinking...

One way of calming yourself is to turn a lie in to some form of truth, thus taking away the feeling of lying...

If he saw her as Sarah Lacomba, then by saying “I did not kill Sarah Wellgreen” he could be using this as a coping mechanism to get through his lie in his mind.

that is assuming the reporting is correct!
 
  • #578
Whys the heading now saying DECEASED! What have I missed!
 
  • #579
Hey guys... long time reader, first time poster :cool:

I’ve been following this case from the beginning with a very open mind, but now I’m praying the jury see it the way I think most of us do.

the question they have to answer first seems really simple to me... Is Sarah Wellgreen dead?

100%. to be alive she’d have needed to sneak off without being noticed by any cameras, no other cars were there, no money, no phone, no passport. Not even James Bond would get away that easily... the defence case is almost like suggesting she disappeared in the darkness and fled via helicopter with her mysterious rich lover. for me question 1 is a formality.

One thing really getting me is when he answers questions he refers to her as Sarah Wellgreen, is this the reporters writing? Or his actual words? Because that freaks me out...


180,000 people a year go missing in the UK! That's 1every 90 seconds x
 
  • #580

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
3,313
Total visitors
3,432

Forum statistics

Threads
632,634
Messages
18,629,501
Members
243,231
Latest member
Irena21D
Back
Top