Hey guys... long time reader, first time poster
I’ve been following this case from the beginning with a very open mind, but now I’m praying the jury see it the way I think most of us do.
the question they have to answer first seems really simple to me... Is Sarah Wellgreen dead?
100%. to be alive she’d have needed to sneak off without being noticed by any cameras, no other cars were there, no money, no phone, no passport. Not even James Bond would get away that easily... the defence case is almost like suggesting she disappeared in the darkness and fled via helicopter with her mysterious rich lover. for me question 1 is a formality.
One thing really getting me is when he answers questions he refers to her as Sarah Wellgreen, is this the reporters writing? Or his actual words? Because that freaks me out...