I found this very interesting website from Denmark called Verfassung which means constitution in English. This particular topic is about The End of NATO as we Know It
verfassungsblog.de
Foreboding, to say the least. It ends on a positive note, one that I believe is heeded today by all EU countries and NATO (minus the US). Europe and Canada must direct vast sums towards defence building not to defend against former threats of Russia and China, but to defend against all major powers.
Ukraine and Greenland must be defended first and foremost. Russia and the United States are threatening those two countries. It is believed that if Ukraine falls, the EU will be next. Similarly, if Greenland falls, Iceland and Canada will be next.
"It is frighteningly easy to picture a situation in which President Trump steps off a plane and declares: “I have in my hands a paper signed by Mister Putin, there will be peace for our time.” When Neville Chamberlain declared “
peace for our time” on 30 September 1938, holding up the
Munich Agreement which condoned the German Annexation of the Sudetenland, the world was at war only one year later.
...
Within one month in office, the United States has withdrawn from the
Paris Climate Agreement and the
World Health Organization, blamed Ukraine, a state attacked
in flagrant violation of international law, for the war waged against it and initiated
bilateral talks with Russia on the future of Ukraine, regardless of Ukrainian sovereignty, making it
an object rather than a subject of negotiations. Current US-strategy is designed around
fast-moving shock-and-awe announcements.
...
Treaty. Issuing a threat to
use military force to seize control of Greenland, a self-governing territory belonging to the Kingdom of Denmark, another NATO-Member, is beyond any doubt a violation of the Prohibition of the threat of force in Article 2 (4) UN-Charter. Furthermore, this threat contradicts the terms and spirit of the NATO-Treaty. Since President Trump is legally prevented from leaving NATO by the 2024
National Defense Authorization Act (Sec. 1250A) which requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate for a decision to leave NATO, the aim is rather to undermine it. The non-committal nature of Article 5, in spite of a formidable
standing NATO-command structure, leaves room for such an approach.
...
A political community that cannot defend itself against external threats and must depend on others for its defence is, sooner or later, faced with decline, much like
the Roman Empire.
Europe still has a choice."
same link
~ in my humble opinion ~