US threatens to annex Greenland - 2025/2026

  • #701
If something isn't dangerous, and it is placed in a public area outside a US embassy, do the embassy staff have the right to remove it?

Well, it appears that the staff at the US embassy in Copenhagen did consider Danish flags with the names of Danish soldiers fallen in Afghanistan placed outside the embassy area as a threat to USA.

Staff at the US embassy in Copenhagen have removed 44 flags decorated with the names of Danish soldiers that were killed in Afghanistan, put up after US President Donald Trump’s recent criticism of allied countries’ military contributions.
 
  • #702
If something isn't dangerous, and it is placed in a public area outside a US embassy, do the embassy staff have the right to remove it?

Well, it appears that the staff at the US embassy in Copenhagen did consider Danish flags with the names of Danish soldiers fallen in Afghanistan placed outside the embassy area as a threat to USA.



I am ashamed at reading this.

Very much ashamed.
 
  • #703
I wonder, why did the President name it "The Golden Dome" when gold, (granted, while not gallium or mercury) is a very soft and structurally weak metal? Why not The Titanium Dome or better yet, The Chrome Dome, steel and chromium, two of the strongest metals on Earth. Just some thoughts.
How about calling it the Don Dome lol?
 
  • #704
The US missile defence and deterrence system is becoming obsolete due to advancements in stealth missile systems from China and Russia. I do not believe that the US is concerned about Canada or Greenland, but only the airspace above those countries. If the US could intercept a missile in Canada or Greenland airspace, I do not believe the US would care how that impacted either country.

Alternatively, is the plan to build the dome on Greenland and Canada Arctic borders, but the US also wants to own that land? That's another problem, since neither Canada nor Greenland will allow the US to buy, or take, pieces of their country.

The US says that Canada needs to pay $71B for the "bogged down" project, even though the project appears to have limited benefit for Canada. The US also says that Greenland must belong to the US, again with limited benefit to Greenland.

Clearly there are serious problems with the project if the US needs money from Canada and land from Greenland (where the US is free to set up a military base as needed). The Dome project should have a plan that does not rely on other countries beyond approval to use airspace or to lease land for a military base.

Personally, I don't think the technology exists to extend the Iron Dome from current range of roughly 180 miles to roughly 2200+ miles (distance Canada-US border to Canada Northern border). A similar distance is needed to reach Greenland. (see google maps: distance tool). The goal is to detect missiles at the time they are launched in Russia and China.

Bottom line, if the US builds their Dome, Canada will automatically be covered regardless of paying for it.

"Canada will need to pay US$71 billion to be included in the Golden Dome defence system, U.S. President Donald Trump revealed Monday."​

June 2025

"While Trump himself may have his own motivations, the U.S. defence establishment is genuinely worried about recent developments in Russian nuclear weapons technology, including stealthy hypersonic missiles and nuclear torpedoes that could target U.S. ports.​
Fears that American missile defence and deterrence are being rendered obsolete are the impetus behind Golden Dome."
...​
Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles that nuclear adversaries would fire at each other take the shortest direct route on a ballistic trajectory from their silos or launchers to targets. The shortest flight paths from China or Russia to the United States — and the other way — would take many of them over the Arctic region."​


January 25, 2026
Why should Canada have to pay anything for this? Seems kind of ridiculous to me. Your project - you pay for it. MOO
 
  • #705
  • #706
  • #707
First it was Canada that had to recognize that the relationship with the US is permanently altered, now the EU has arrived at the same conclusion. Although the US government backed away from military aggression against Greenland, the damage is done.

"The recent geopolitical tug-of-war over Greenland is, according to French President Emmanuel Macron, "a strategic wake-up call for all of Europe." He said this in a joint statement in Paris with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen.

This wake-up call highlights the need to strengthen European sovereignty, contribute to Arctic security, and resist foreign interference and disinformation. Combating climate change also plays a crucial role in this.

In addition, the French President reiterated France's solidarity with Greenland's territorial independence.
...

"The transatlantic relationship is dead. We must draw the necessary conclusions from this," said Charles Michel, former President of the European Council and former Belgian Prime Minister, on the French-language channel RTL-TVi.
...

After Trump threatened to take Greenland militarily, the European Council convened an emergency meeting, but that summit proved unnecessary when Trump suddenly withdrew the threat.

Michel believes that Europe "must become more radical and swift in the way we take action for ourselves." "If you smile in diplomacy after the first blow, you'll get a second, and then a third," said Charles Michel."

 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
162
Guests online
1,596
Total visitors
1,758

Forum statistics

Threads
638,916
Messages
18,735,140
Members
244,555
Latest member
FabulousQ
Back
Top