UT - 5 or 6 year old girl assaulted and found in neighbors yard.

  • #41
This article came out in the Jaycee Dugard case it is talking about kids walking to school. It seems appropriate for this case too. It makes good points both ways.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/fashion/13kids.html?hpw

Here are my thoughts. Because of sex offenders, kids now have to live almost in lockdown. Can't walk to school, visit in the neighborhood, or even play in the yard unattended. They are paying for the sex offenders with an important part of their childhood and their journey to independence.

Stranger attacks are considered to be rare. But they are costly. Kids raped, tortured, missing or murdered. So where do you draw the line? How much protection is necessary and how much is being overprotective? How much danger are kids really in? Some people let their kids walk in the neighborhood. Some people let their kids walk for blocks. Some people confine kids to the yard. Some people won't let children outside without an adult. It is common sense that to some extent it will depend on the level of maturity of the child. But even then, no child is a match for an adult.

Then you also have to take this into consideration. The majority of sex attacks on kids is by persons known to them. They are the GF's, the uncles, the dad's, mom's boyfriends, the babysitters. Sometimes even their teachers or doctors. So the parents who are not letting their kids play outside, are they also not allowing their kids to spend time with other adults?

I don't know the answers. But wanted to see what you all think.

I agree so much with the tone of this post, thank you mysteriew. I’m coming out of reading mode to offer my thoughts, which I struggle with constantly.

My daughter is 3, so I haven’t had to act on my choices yet. It breaks my heart to have to restrict her in ways I never was. Freedom and independence is invaluable… priceless. That our kids have to give some of this up because of the existence of troubled freaks (male or female) is the biggest shame I know of. These stories and resulting discussions that keep us awake at night, many of them would’ve been prevented if someone wasn’t allowed to repeat.

I am a compassionate person. I like to give the benefit of the doubt. But even if we weren’t armed with the knowledge that these offenders are rarely (I believe never) rehabilitated, we’re risking the innocence of our children and our children themselves to protect them and their rights. I don’t get it. These “people” think of nothing but harming children… obsessively, with an unspeakable thirst most of us can’t imagine. And what do we do? We knowingly let them exist in our population! What the! Something is horribly wrong.

I know that my feelings may change as my daughter grows, and as I (hopefully) grow as a parent. Regarding your topic, my present personal set of rules to get my family through the next few years

- can’t walk to school unless with me or dad, a trusted adult, or a group of kids I believe to be responsible.
- can’t play in the neighbourhood without our supervision. ex. I'm outside in a lawn chair while she explores the front yards of our street, am hopefully having a coffee or a beer with another mom or dad. If she isn’t visible, you can bet I’ll be going for a walk-by, regularly.
- going inside friends’ houses is negotiable, depending on my relationship with the parents. To the best of my ability, I will always know the occupation, address, and phone number of all adults in the house, but to her, I’ll downplay my involvement as much as I can.
- can’t play in the yard unattended, even the fenced back one.
- no, she can’t spend time alone with adults. I’ll insist on being present if any one-adult-on-one kid-time is requested (I’ll at least be outside the office door). I want to know about it if an adult is alone with her without my permission, and I’ll have to trust her to help me enforce that.

I know that the above won’t guarantee she doesn’t encounter danger, but this is what I’ve reconciled, so far. I don’t know at what age I’ll flex. However. I want her to never feel resentful, or that she’s not free to know her own self, apart from me. I will also need her to learn how to make her own choices, without constant discerning eyes and a hand to hold. I don’t want her to feel spied on. I use the word can’t in my examples above because that’s what it feels like, it isn’t a choice. It is a necessary evil, and I have someone to blame for that. I am paying, with my beautiful child’s sense of freedom, for some abomination to have a chance to be hopelessly rehabilitated.

I will also add that I am in a quiet and almost crime-less mid-upper class neighbourhood, in a small city, in a small province, in small-country Canada. You should just SEE the naivety!! Okay, okay, okay. I know it probably won’t happen. But I know it might… it could! Thankfully, I can probably prevent IT, and I will try my best. I, like you, defenselessly imagine every child’s and loved one’s terror when I read the stories here. When I feel broken and ashamed to be a human.

My relative is a school teacher in my city. She just told me of a young student in a city school who was approached by a man in the girls’ bathroom. The school was on lockdown. I’ll never hear about that in the news.

This might have been OT and self fulfilling (wow I really got something off my chest), but I hope it’s not a totally inappropriate place to finally let it out in a post. I don’t want to take anything from this poor little girl. It is her story, with all the others, that I feel so strongly about it’s in my bones. I can’t look at the world without knowing who is out there. I am so thankful to websleuths for knowing.

That said, I hope they have found who is responsible. It looks like it was this teenaged boy, I guess we can be glad he was caught early, "only" at the expense of this young girl and her loved ones. If only we would let them be the last to be ruined by this inexplicably horrid human being. I wish I could lend them all my strength, but I know I can't, really. I ache for them. Really doesn't help them, though.

 
  • #42
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=7928070

the 17 yo has been arrested

VB

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=7928070

mother of the 6 yo girl reacts to the arrest

I hate to admit that I've been expecting this, but I have. I truly wanted this mentally disabled kid to be a hero, and it is so sad for his family that it seems as though he was the one who beat and choked her.

I will admit being thankful that the arrest came as a result of the little girl's identification of the young man, because I would have worried if it were a confession. The mentally disabled are too often tricked into making false confessions by cops who are smarter than they and who know how to manipulate them.
 
  • #43
Teen Charged with Kidnapping and Sexual Assault

The teenager first heralded as a hero, is now charged with kidnapping, sexually abusing and assaulting a 6-year-old West Valley girl.

The Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office charged the 17-year-old Monday and a warrant was issued for his arrest.

The teen initially told investigators that on Sept. 11 he heard the girl crying while taking a break from mowing his lawn and saw her bleeding on the other side of his fence. He then told his sister and a neighbor.

The neighbor found the girl unconscious and bleeding. She eventually opened her eyes, but was going in and out of consciousness. She was flown to Primary Children's Medical Center in serious condition but has since been released.

But according to charging documents, during a second interview with West Valley City police, the teen admitted to luring the girl into his backyard, pushing her to the ground and choking her until she was unconscious. He said he choked her because he, quote: "wanted her to sleep or something."

Prosecutors say the teen then sexually assaulted the girl before throwing her over the backyard fence.


Charing documents say the teen had bloody scratch marks on his mouth and neck and a cut on his right knee. They also say the teen confessed to detectives, saying, "Tell the little girl I am sorry for what I did to her."

Snipped from: http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=8002356
 
  • #44
Channel 2 news is reporting that he told police he sexually assaulted her, but did not have intercourse with her.
Poor little sweetie.
 
  • #45
I wonder about the 17 yr old's disability. If he's severely challenged, it could be a problem to prosecute him.
 
  • #46
I wonder about the 17 yr old's disability. If he's severely challenged, it could be a problem to prosecute him.

He is able to know what he did is wrong and to attempt to conceal his crime so I can't imagine he is severely challenged. IMO, a pedophile rapist is a criminal who must be prosecuted and kept away from children, mentally challenged or not. It doesn't make him any less of a danger to innocent children.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
114
Guests online
2,647
Total visitors
2,761

Forum statistics

Threads
632,867
Messages
18,632,828
Members
243,316
Latest member
Sfebruary
Back
Top