• #1,321
Be honest... has anyone here forged their spouse's signature?... even if for non-consequential efficiency? I think most have it could be something simple like both parents signing a child's report card or a time share weekly booking request.

I could do it fairly well I think... but a real expert (like I know a forensic hand writing expert) would spot my errors.

My husband hasn't signed his own name on anything for years. Between his Parkinsons and ARMD, it is all me. Of course, I am his POA, so maybe that is different.
 
  • #1,322
I’m confused why he stayed with her after he suspected she tried to poison him with the sandwich. He also knew she was financially defrauding him. I’m not blaming the victim-I’m genuinely baffled. He spoke with a divorce attorney but changed his mind. He disinherited her from his assets, essentially.

I can’t make sense of it. Even if he felt he should stay for the boys, my god! At what cost??

It's like the Lori Daybell/Charles Vallow case. Spouses need to learn that if you remove a shady spouse as a death beneficiary, you need to tell them so they no longer have that incentive. You have to tell them or divorce them. You have to do at least one or both.
 
  • #1,323
Witness just asked if the Defense attorney was referring to jail calls.

Oops.

Jurors don't know she's been in jail.

Sidebar.

JMO
definitely an oops :oops:
 
  • #1,324
Dr Patrice Berry on her youtube podcast addressed this, saying there are various reasons for staying. She is a Psychologist in VA, and has very good instincts, as well as experience.

Addressed what?
 
  • #1,325
definitely an oops :oops:
I don’t blame her, Nester was hammering with ridiculous questions trying to make the witness appear wrong
 
  • #1,326
Dr Patrice Berry on her youtube podcast addressed this, saying there are various reasons for staying. She is a Psychologist in VA, and has very good instincts, as well as experience.
Apparently he stayed too long
Did she address those deadly consequences?
 
  • #1,327
Do we know the fentanyl wasn't (or couldn't have been) a tablet or powder placed between his cheek and gum, maybe after he was already asleep?
 
  • #1,328
I don’t blame her, Nester was hammering with ridiculous questions trying to make the witness appear wrong
It's her own fault then, since it makes HER client look bad. The way she worded her own question is her issue.

I hope everything with Judge M are okay, I hope it wasn't something bad that canceled court today. We are such fans of this kind and fair judge with a smooooooth voice. 🥰

LYN (the lawyer you know) youtube channel is hammering on about how all this talk of gummies could be confusing the jury... also isn't giving much detail (yet?) on how the fent got into Eric's system. He is critical of the evidence collection and the fact that the officers on March 3rd did not see this as a possible crime scene.

Emily Baker (also lawyer) is more critical of the defense, and says the officers did their job.

I'm petty so I am keeping track of Kouri's outfits. I did like today's pastel cardigan look. Yesterday was the beige blouse. Day 1 was white blouse and black blazer.

Kouri could have just sat as a pretty wifey and shopped to her heart's content, didn't need to engage in bad real estate deals and hook up with a rando when she had 3 kids and a husband at home. Life choices.
 
  • #1,329
HEY LOOK AT THIS
guy looking down.webp

HEY LOOK.
Lauren from Hidden True Crime and Kit from WordWise will join us tonight. on Websleuths YouTube LIVE.
Lauren has gone deep into the Richins case and Kit from WordWise has done a great video about the book Kouri wrote about grief...after she (alegedly) kills her husband.
The book is called Are You With Me.
JOIN US AT 10:30 PM EASTERN TONIGHT.

 
  • #1,330
I don’t blame her, Nester was hammering with ridiculous questions trying to make the witness appear wrong

It's so blatant. Purposefully asking the right questions to the wrong witness.

Did you catch this one? She's asking the investigator if she looked here and there, tested this and that. Witness says she didn't go into the kitchen at all, and Nester thanks her for clarifying that and adds -- then I won't waste my time asking you more questions about the kitchen.

At least we're all agreed -- Defense is simply wasting time. Putting of the inevitable.

JMO
 
  • #1,331
It's like the Lori Daybell/Charles Vallow case. Spouses need to learn that if you remove a shady spouse as a death beneficiary, you need to tell them so they no longer have that incentive. You have to tell them or divorce them. You have to do at least one or both.
What a horrible "marriage" - she caring absolutely nothing for him, except for what she could get out of him, and he trusting her less and less. Probably also beginning to be afraid of her.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
85
Guests online
2,127
Total visitors
2,212

Forum statistics

Threads
643,737
Messages
18,804,397
Members
245,225
Latest member
D007pi***
Top