Court in recess until 9:30 am MT
I think the implication is that the two single gummies not in retail packaging may not have been mass produced and were possibly obtained from someone who home made them.I get where they’re going with this, but the gummies were mass produced. Not like something a friend got from a guy who made them. No way in the thousands and thousands of batches, one gummy happened to be laced.
Yea. I still think that’s a stretch, but I understand they’re just working towards reasonable doubt. Maybe part of the jury selection, on the defense’s side, was trying to find people really not familiar with THC products (legally obtained or otherwise). MOOI think the implication is that the two single gummies not in retail packaging may not have been mass produced and were possibly obtained from someone who home made them.
yes, Uhlmer I think was ME, both good witnesses, easy to follow.Peterson is great. Similar to the ME (blanking on name). Very knowledgeable, but also very good at making the science understandable. MOO
Agreed. ME name is Dr. Pamela Ulmer.Peterson is great. Similar to the ME (blanking on name). Very knowledgeable, but also very good at making the science understandable. MOO