At this rate, it will be lunch time before the trial starts
Sheesh, these guys sound like real upstanding citizens, NOT! :doh:
I just noticed some of you mentioning HLN wasnt great for watching because of breaks.
Which link would be the best please? Never watched a trial that wasn't on CSPAN lol.
TIA
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
I don't believe they have discussed this yet, but the judge mentioned that the state is asking him to reconsider his ruling Friday on whether the defense opened two doors. I bet they have transcript in hand and pointed out some of the things I mentioned a few pages ago.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Martin MacNeill: Michelle's death murder or accident? -Utah #4
Yeah, come in late - Go to lunch. Go home.
:lol:
So, judge tells jury to come in at 10. Why didn't he start this hearing at 9?
I sure hope the Judge reconsiders. Especially the letter that Alexis denied knowing about. The defense presented it as evidence to show the character of Alexis to lie under oath. IMO the State ought to have the opportunity to remedy.
Think it is NOT worth using the testimony of Mr. P. His 'issues' are much to much for him to be believed. Toss this witness.
I'm more interested to hear what the judge says about the "families are forever" comment. Spencer claimed they didn't elicit it, but rather that Sabrina offered it as a "gratuitous" comment. The transcript will show that not only did Gustin elicit it - she introduced it as a yes/no question as to whether he said it!
I don't expect the judge will be too thrilled to realize the defense was lying through their teeth to him on Friday.
Think it is NOT worth using the testimony of Mr. P. His 'issues' are much to much for him to be believed. Toss this witness.