Above respectfully snipped by me..
I believe your above train of thought is definitely a possibility as to what the dynamics are of how this crime was executed.. while early on I do know that it was reported that there were supposedly NO SIGNS OF A BREAK IN/FORCED ENTRY into the Neubold home, but since then it is one of the details that are now being answered with a NO COMMENT and no verifying this to be fact.. IMO I believe the initial reports are likely accurate and that quite possibly there are no signs of forcible entry into the home.. I believe NVgirl gives a very plausible theory as to how the perp gained entry to the home WITHOUT forcible entry.. we know from following similar cases that the likelihood is greater that Sierra was atleast somewhat familiar with her killer rather than the perp being a complete, unknown stranger.. while not certain of any aspects as being facts but IMO in theorizing possibilities and dynamics of this assault/murder IMO this perp is going to be atleast somewhat familiar with his victim, her family that lived in the home, layout of the interior of the home(including aware of interior surveillance), as well as likely familiar with this families habits and schedules..
NVgirl also presents IMO the likelihood that the perp abducted Sierra at some point overnight/early pre-dawn hours, rather than the very tight time frame of dads leaving the home for work at 7am.. and the 30mins til mom became aware that Sierra was not in her bedroom or the home.. and as we know from there it quickly was unfolded within a matter of another half hour from when mom calls 911 at 7:30 and LE discover Sierras body by 8am one block from the home.. I personally don't believe it likely that Sierra was in her bed/in the home when dad left the home at 7am(and I know there are those who don't understand how/why a parent, any parent could possibly be completely unaware that their child was not in their bedroom, in their bed when the parent is awake,preps for work, and leaves the home...ALL WITHOUT EVER CHECKING IN ON THEIR CHILD) ..but IMO it very much happens and IMO is more standard than many believe, especially when the parent is leaving the home in early morning hours when everyone else in the family is still sleeping.. this is SOP.. they awake, shower, quietly walk thru the family home so as to not wake any of the sleeping fam members, maybe or maybe not quickly grab a quick breakfast from the kitchen and then quietly out the door and off to work.. many, many times IF ANYONE is seen, spoken to, or kissed good bye it is strictly going to be ONLY THE SPOUSE with whom they share a bedroom/bathroom with.. and even then many times they do not wish to even disturb or wake the spouse.. but IMO more often than not the early morning working parent does not see, speak, kiss good bye the sleeping children in the home.. as well as IMO when there is a schedule of an early morning working shift for one of the parents even morseo will we see the children's bedroom doors are pulled shut for the obvious reasons jmo..
This therefore the very logical and understandable reasons that an early morning working parent would NOT ever be aware that a child was NOT behind that closed bedroom door, safely in their bed, fast asleep as the child is every other morning of their lives..
Its for those reasons why I am also not automatically suspicious of it being indicative of parental involvement.. with the teeny modicum of details/info that we know while I definitely believe its very likely that the perp is someone fairly well known to/by Sierra, but not at all necessarily an "inside job" of anyone presently living in the home.. am definitely not ruling this possibility out, tho (especially with all of the above discussed possibilities of MUCH OLDER siblings, blood related or not) ..but DEFINITELY NOT necessarily an "inside job" if its accurate that there was no forced entry..
the manipulation of a 6 year old, young, trusting little girl is sadly like taking candy from a baby for a predator, especially! ..they hone such type skills to use on their young prey.. my God the possibilities are endless of ruses that could have been used to quietly have the victim actually assist the perp in his making effortless entry into the family home.. one other possibility/scenario is quite likely that the perp NEVER EVEN ENTERED THE HOME(thereby leaving zero forensic evidence behind) but rather had Sierra come to him by agreeing to open the door to the home and he quickly takes her from the doorway..if say the perp was to tap on Sierra's bedroom window and used any number of ruses to have Sierra come around to the front, side, back door of the home(or tho IMO not as likely, but still a possibility just somehow had Sierra open her window and he simply pulled her through, or had her climb out.for instance what if he said the home was on fire and all of the family was already safely outside and had her simply crawl out or be assisted out&through her bedroom window..this would mean there were no, or easily raised screens on her window..but nonetheless still a mere possibility and is also a scenario where the perp could be a COMPLETE STRANGER to Sierra and was posing as an authority figure(fireman/police officer) or even just as a "good samiritan"...again remote as far as bedroom window scenario goes but yet a possibility imo).. of course the one staple MUST BE THAT THE PERP IS KNOWN AND POSSIBLY EVEN TRUSTED ON SOME LEVEL BY THE VICTIM for this scenario to fit(save the emergency bedroom window scenario where stranger could pose as authority figure or helpful individual attempting to save her life) ..
With so very little known factors there is a myriad of differing ways this perp could have successfully abducted Sierra.. some of them having left little to zero evidence behind that could be used to help identify the perpatrator.. hoping soon we will hear that LE is well on their way to identifying and arresting this child sexual predator/murderer!
All of the above are jmo, and nothing more! :moo:
