This is what happens in the beginning of these cases, the facts get confused. Like on the NG program, I believe, they mentioned that he'd been unemployed but was due to start a new job. We also had links to his website as a real estate agent. However, after reading comments by locals in some of the news articles, it's been stated that he hadn't been doing real estate for some time. Then you have another poster who claims to work with him in IT. But, that's kind of saying 'work,' present tense, so that wouldn't be a new job?
Yeah, confusing but that's part of sleuthing, putting the pieces together, sometimes perhaps in the wrong place and they may fit at a later time. These are statements found on one of the earlier articles linked, from someone who claims to know the husband. So this is just fwiw, and not necessarily the truth or accurate. Just to be stored in the back of your mind and maybe to be brought forward again as part of the big picture, or not.
JMHO
fran
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=8997206&comments=true
1. A person claiming to be a co-worker of the husband, said it wouldn't be unusual for this guy to pick up at any given moment and go camping. He's kind of a computer 'geek.' OTOH, they claim he and fellow co-workers find it curious that Susan would have let him take the children out like that at night. They remain concerned for their co-worker.
2. Another person said that the husband is not a 'violent' type person but they claim that during the past five years he has been verbally abusive to Susan..............take this with a grain of salt unless you see it repeated by more of Susan's family and friends. One comment doesn't necessarily make it so, but multiple statements repeating the same thing, becomes a pattern.
I'm still reading the comments so may add more later,
fran
PS...Oops............just realized that the second statement mentioned above is not the same person, co-worker, but someone else who's known him for 8 years. I'll correct it.......fran
The first person listed above said he'd heard about the husband's treatment of Susan, but to him it was hear-say as he'd never seen that and they had been at the company Xmas party just the night before and everything seemed fine............
