Thank you. I think what bothers me is when people make statements that are so emphatic that people no longer are interested in following due process. If I was to estimate how sure I was of JP's guilt, I would say probably 85% - 90%, somewhere in there. And I think that's rather extreme given that so far we have been shown not a shred of evidence. Only that JP has the opportunity (some would add motive, but that's speculation), and his alibi for the time period in question cannot be verified by anyone or anything except his four-year old.
If I were placed on a jury and not one piece of incriminating evidence were provided, no way would I vote to convict. It's just not right to convict the most likely suspect just because he's not acting in a way we feel he should be acting. But give me something - If one of the boys said that JP told them that "Mommy has to stay out in the woods for awhile", I would convict on that. But right now, no. Again, there are probably dozens of cases that I have watched the analysis of for example on "the First 48", or "MSNBC 48 Hours Mystery" where the guilty person turned out to be someone that NOBODY had looked at as a suspect before.