The inconsistencies in AH's stories are a red flag if any, it's like when she tries to explain to the jury that she escaped JD's alleged violence by leaving a room and closing the door behind her, then says JD was trying to get (in), wouldn't he be trying to get (out) of the room to chase after AH? AH then admits In this struggle he gets a knock to his head from the door, well most doors in rooms swing to the inside of the room, the only way JD is going to get a knock on his head is if AH was to force the door inwards while JD struggles to close it, from the inside of the room.Something which I didn't always catch the first time, but which now makes me side-eye upon the re-watch of AH's testimony is that she tells her story from the perspective of the camera a lot. Like she is watching in third person. Like how would she know a boot was touching her back on the plane? Or how Johnny's eyes looked if he was kneeing her into the bed face down and pummeling the back of her head? Quite often when she describes violent actions being done to her, she mimes the attacker in that scenario (pulling hair, punching etc). Several times she slips up with the pronouns, "I loosened my grip", or "when he was walking away". JMO but I think she is fabricating and also flipping roles, pretending to be the victim in incidents where she was more likely the aggressor.
I can't stress enough that multiple audio recordings are out there and easily accessible. It will show just how manufactured the woman on the stand testifying is, compared to (in my opinion) the real AH. Contrast is frightening.
And don't even get me started on her own drug and alcohol abuse issues.
Last edited: