VA - Johnny Depp's defamation case against ex Amber Heard, who countersued #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #501
Sky News

Depp is suing Heard for 'forever tarnishing his good name'

Continuing his motion to strike Amber Heard's counterclaim against Johnny Depp, the actor's lawyer Ben Chew says that the ACLU and Amber Heard were "conspiring" to make it clear that the Washington Post article she wrote about domestic violence was about Depp, even though he was not named in it.

Earlier in the trial, jurors heard testimony from Terence Dougherty, general counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), who told the court that a staff member wrote the first version of the Washington Post article under the actress's name and that tweaks were made to avoid making a direct link to her ex-husband.

The op-ed was published as Heard was announced as an ambassador for the organisation.

Depp is suing Heard for "forever tarnishing his good name", Mr Chew says.
 
  • #502
Her lawyer is outraged that anyone would say she was being investigated for perjury---but she is now being investigated for perjury in both Australia and the UK,so her lawyer should tread lightly...
 
  • #503
She refused to sign the pledge card? LMAO after all that bull about her 'pledging' ALL of her divorce settlement?
I just heard BC say that but I don't recall hearing this during proceedings. I'd love to know the reason for refusing to even sign the pledge card.
 
  • #504
There is no proof that AW started a hoax with JD. Whatever comments AW made online were his opinion and I don't recall him claiming that he witnessed anything. MOO
 
  • #505
Chew: …but she did stiff the dead and dying children
 
  • #506
Sky News

'Mr Depp is an abuser'

Amber Heard's lawyer Ben Rottenborn is now addressing Judge Penney Azcarate about Johnny Depp's motion to strike the actress's counterclaim against him.

It's a little complicated so we'll try to keep repeating this bit - Depp is suing Heard for $50m for an article she wrote about domestic violence which was published in the Washington Post in December 2018; Heard is countersuing Depp for $100m over statements his former lawyer Adam Waldman made about her over her allegations against Depp.

"Mr Depp is an abuser who abused Ms Heard," Mr Rottenborn tells the court, saying Heard did not conspire with her friends to create a hoax about her ex-husband.
 
  • #507
Thank you BC! I am so happy he brought her hitting comments up. She has physically assualted him, her own words.
 
  • #508
G'morning WS Friends, Looking forward to watching (and commenting on) today's and tomorrow's rebuttal. Does anyone think there may be some surprises?
 
  • #509
G'morning WS Friends, Looking forward to watching (and commenting on) today's and tomorrow's rebuttal. Does anyone think there may be some surprises?
Is that what happens now? JD presents rebuttal?
 
  • #510
Is that what happens now? JD presents rebuttal?

Yes. Court TV published who is supposed to be called for rebuttal. JD's hand doctor is on the list. As a juror, I'd give more weight to the testimony of a doctor who actually examined JD vs the expert from yesterday.
 
  • #511
Sky News

Judge denies Depp's motion to throw out Amber Heard's counterclaim

Judge Penney Azcarate says she has reviewed all the evidence and denies the motion to strike.

The jury should be allowed back in shortly and today's witnesses will begin.
 
  • #512
Whitney looks happy :rolleyes:
 
  • #513
So many attorneys up at sidebar before rebuttal begins…

Whitney is there…looking like she might fall asleep
 
  • #514
I think Chew made a good argument with good case law behind it in his motion to dismiss (strike) AH's counter claim. But I knew he wouldn't win it. The judge is content to let the jury wade through all the he said she said.
 
  • #515
So many attorneys up at sidebar before rebuttal begins…

Whitney is there…looking like she might fall asleep

I wonder if she is secretly a bit gutted that the motion was denied?
 
  • #516
I keep getting distracted because the court reporter looks just like someone who works in my local morrisons :oops:
 
  • #517
They are wasting so much time in this sidebar---I bet AH team will have as long sidebars as possible to run out the clock
 
  • #518
They are wasting so much time in this sidebar---I bet AH team will have as long sidebars as possible to run out the clock
Does that count? not fair IMHO. Eek!

ETA: Sidebars should not count! MOO.
 
  • #519
They are wasting so much time in this sidebar---I bet AH team will have as long sidebars as possible to run out the clock
If they're petty things, can't the judge refuse their request to approach? I don't follow many court cases so I'm not sure how that works.
 
  • #520
This is so frustrating!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
1,308
Total visitors
1,373

Forum statistics

Threads
632,330
Messages
18,624,827
Members
243,092
Latest member
senyazv
Back
Top