VA - Johnny Depp's defamation case against ex Amber Heard, who countersued #8

[wasnt_me]

ZING! There's a very creative burn

I heard and accepted that with a big laugh!

 

[gloomy]

But the recent guy that mouthed off did it IN RETURN as she was the one being rude to him.

EB is getting paid well. I'm sure she's used to dealing with rude, combative people in court. I don't think it's a big deal. EB has probably dealt with some interesting characters. MOO

 

[wasnt_me]

If anyone still has doubts, this testimony demonstrating AH's photos were altered to show bruises, should help them make a logical decision.

Yeah, let's put that "should" in bold red. But I agree.

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Another sidebar

 

[tlcya]

Why can't the expert opine on the color edits to the photos? It is clear that the judge has not allowed him to do so and I am so curious why. I could care less if the photo sizes were edited. He clearly believes the coloration was also edited but I don't get why he isn't allowed to say that. Sigh

 

[Luna20]

Who is AH looking back at? Is it Whitney?

They do not want these photos shown! Here we go with the degrees!

 

[tlcya]

There is no way for any expert to validate these photos.

on cross AH team pointing out he has no degree in this (just 40 years experience, including the Jodi Aries trial)

 

[Kiranerys]

wow, so now we have an expert saying what we already knew. her photo evidence was edited. And not just with auto feature through the Iphone, but uploaded from the phone to a computer where a more sophisticated app was used to alter them.

Where is the AH is toast emoji when you need it?

 

[fred&edna]

Poor Mr Neumeister... he's fabulously trained and hasn't been allowed to testify.

 

[Kiranerys]

Making a CV for McDonald's

Don't think I'd be letting her loose with a spatula if I could help it

 

[wasnt_me]

AH's lawyer is making it worse by not letting the photo guy explain. It looks like they are hiding something.

 

[BadRx]

Well who else would modify the photo's if not Ms Heard??

 

[Weki]

Hahhahaha Judge! “Judy has a different voice” I feel you judge. I believe she’s over it!

 

[tlcya]

AH's lawyer is making it worse by not letting the photo guy explain. It looks like they are hiding something.

because they are LOL

Facts suck when a lie is faced with them. They are working overtime to try to a) keep testimony about the color edits out and b) discredit the expert by not allowing him to complete an answer.

 

[wasnt_me]

Well who else would modify the photo's if not Ms Heard??

For some of them, Raquel. I remember some testimony that Heard had asked that RP email or upload some photos. I can't remember if they were the 12/15 or the 5/21 photos.

 

[Weki]

The judge has ruled in favor of AH on what this witness can testify to. So the law seems to be on defense’s side on the chrome/color question.

 

[fred&edna]

Don't think I'd be letting her loose with a spatula if I could help it

Their fries are gonna' smell like perjury if she does.

 

[Weki]

JD is eyeballing the defense atty right now y’all see it!

 

[Allabouttrial]

Sky News

Different versions of the same photos

Digital forensics expert Bryan Neumeister is now being asked about more photographs of Amber Heard.

He was asked to analyse pictures of her alleged injuries to say whether or not they are genuine or have been altered.

The court is shown a video of Heard with a red face, which shows different versions of the same photo "treated two different ways", Mr Neumeister says.

The second photo "looks quite a bit different", he says, and has been edited using Photos 3.0 software.

He is then shown another video showing another two versions of the same picture, which you can see here.





Under cross-examination, Mr Neumeister tells the court that there are numerous tools and methods that can be used to anyalyse the authenticity of photos.

Asked if he is offering an opinion on whether Heard intentionally modified photos submitted to the court, Mr Neumeister says he is "just stating the fact that photographs were modified".

 

[gloomy]

This cross just continues to make AH look like a liar imo. The photos have different dates if you look at the data, one says 2013, the other says 2015 and then the other says 2016? MOO And this is for the same photo.

Edit- to clarify.