Good detailed article:
http://www.readthehook.com/blog/ind...irfax-case-connection-offers-hope-fresh-fear/
http://www.readthehook.com/blog/ind...irfax-case-connection-offers-hope-fresh-fear/
Really great article, thanks Harmony 2.
A few things stand out, the rape victim was brutally beaten and strangled until she passed out. Someone passing by most likely saved her life and scared the killer away. He learned from this and took Morgan from the area.
from the article...
The Tee shirt "discovered in mid-November on a bush outside an apartment building at the corner of Grady Avenue and Fifteenth Street, would provide a bizarre twist in an already confusing case.
In April, five months after its discovery, police announced that forensic evidence revealed that the Pantera t-shirt which some believed was a lookalike shirt placed by someone unrelated to the case as a twisted joke did, in fact, belong to Morgan. That forensic evidence, says Barfield, was most likely DNA and, he says, a likely source for the match with the Fairfax case since extracting an assailants DNA evidence from Morgans decomposed remains, which were exposed to the elements for three months, would have been very difficult."
He must have kept the tee shirt for awhile, then put it or threw it on the bush. Weird.
Jenkins says her son returned with a man and a woman who comforted the victim, and the three communicated in what she believes was Urdu a language primarily spoken by Muslims in India and Pakistan. The young woman felt more comfortable speaking in her language, says Jenkins, who says she never saw the young woman again but heard she had moved in with family somewhere nearby.
Really great article, thanks Harmony 2.
Respectfully snipped by me for length
That forensic evidence, says Barfield, was most likely DNA— and, he says, a likely source for the match with the Fairfax case since extracting an assailant’s DNA evidence from Morgan’s decomposed remains, which were exposed to the elements for three months, would have been very difficult."
BBM He must have kept the tee shirt for awhile, then put it or threw it on the bush. Weird.
Barclay is only speculating here; though his insights are useful.
If the DNA came from the tee shirt, some person(s) may be trying to frame this suspect. The true perps would then have to know the suspect and his criminal history. They may be members of a gang.
The victim in the first case was foreign.
Could she be absolutely sure that the perp was an African-American, as opposed to a person of African appearance from some other country? Sometimes immigrants are preyed upon by criminals of similar background.
Forcing MH into a car would be difficult for one person acting alone esp. on a busy college campus with lots of security cameras. And, unless he were somehow able to quickly restrain her, he would not have been able keep her in the car while he drove.
The tee shirt incident would be easier for a group than an individual. For some reason, the true killer believed that none of his DNA could possibly be on that tee. This fact suggests that there may have been more than one location and perhaps at least two individuals and/or groups acting separately.
Most serial killers keep some memento..wonder if he was just starting out, or there are other mementos he kept. Some also like "attention". Why not throw it in a trash bag and then throw it in the dumpster? He wanted it found.
ETA: Thanks for thinking of this Colette! I forgot to thank you!
The problem with DNA is that it is so easy to frame someone. The real perp(s) could just follow any individual whom they know has a history, and then take some item he has discarded (like a can of soda), and plant the DNA from it at the scene. If the DNA came from the tee shirt, one wonders how the perp was smart enough to know about cell pings, but would deliberately place the tee where it could be found? But, even if he is being framed, this individual might still know something valuable to the case. The 2005 crime might have been a gang initiation.
I don't think planting DNA is that easy. You can't just look at something and "know" what DNA is on it. Old cigarette butts, cups, etc., might be obvious sources of DNA but not necessarily clothing.
How would the framer be sure that he or she wasn't leaving DNA or other forensic evidence like prints or fibers or hair?
Or in the video camera era, he or she wouldn't be seen on a security camera?
So Los Angeles police are hoping the Grim Sleeper has a brother, father or cousin in prison. Experts believe that roughly 40 percent of violent criminals have close relatives in jail. If the Grim Sleepers familial DNA popped up in a survey of the state offenders database of more than 1 million DNA profiles, the L.A. killer might finally be identified by family name.
A one-time police mechanic was arrested and charged Wednesday in the serial killing of 10 people over 25 years after a DNA sample from his son was found to bear a close resemblance to DNA found on the victims.
Lonnie Franklin Jr., 57, was charged with 10 counts of murder, one count of attempted murder and special circumstance allegations of multiple murders that could make him eligible for the death penalty if convicted, District Attorney Steve Cooley said.
"Today is a good day," Donnell Alexander, the brother of victim Monique Alexander, said as he watched police activity outside the South Los Angeles house where the arrest was made earlier in the day.
Detectives have spent years investigating slayings between 1985 and 2007 in which the killer targeted young black women and one man. The attacker was dubbed the "Grim Sleeper" because he apparently took a 14-year hiatus from his crimes, from 1988 to 2002.
The break in the case came after Franklin's son was arrested and swabbed for DNA, said Alexander, who was given a briefing on the case by robbery-homicide detectives.
Investigators are also mum on what piece of forensic evidence links the two cases, though they did say the evidence—which they didn't have following the sex assault in 2005—allowed them to create a sketch of the suspect in the Fairfax case and subsequently the Harrington case