margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,429
- Reaction score
- 368,996
I noticed on the charging document it says "Abduction: By Force, etc, to Deprive of Liberty"
(Reminded of AH and Kibby)
(Reminded of AH and Kibby)
Social security number
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Social security number
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry, I should have been clearer. I meant on the left side of that page, where it reads: "willfully, deliberately, and with premeditation kill and murder __________ in the first degree." What is redacted there?
They may not have the date of death determined yet. If so, the date is listed as the date her body was located. Good enough for preliminary charging docs. Since he isn't talking and ME is performing autopsy, that may be all that date means on the docs.
on or around Jan. 30
JMO
It wouldn't surprise me if the murder charge flows from the perp's preventing the victim from leaving, which, without her twice daily medication, eventually caused her death. IOW, it's possible he didn't physically harm her at all but is still fully culpable. The female perp's late arrival to help deal with the dead body suggests her male friend told her a quasi-sympathetic story to explain what happened along the line of "I panicked, didn't know what to do, and then she just died on me."
NK looks like your typical college girl on FB. Were NK and DE dating? Did NK and NL have any interaction before this incident?
NK looks like your typical college girl on FB. Were NK and DE dating? Did NK and NL have any interaction before this incident?
No, the wording was "on or about" the 30th. It's likely they have not yet narrowed the time of death, and are using this phrasing as a placeholder for an actual time/date. She *did* die between going missing on the 27th and being found on the 30th, and this is really all that's being stated at this point.
Nk and NL didn't go to the same high school.