- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 29,943
- Reaction score
- 207,853
There was no taunting or humiliation. Nicole told friends he was "funny and nice" and she wanted to marry him and have his kids, and she wrote on her Instagram her new FB actually treated her well. Also police know exactly why he killed her. They've said "he did it because she was about to tell people about the inappropriate relationship." Not "we think he did it because...." I'm sure the texts and messages tell the whole story. From Day 1 when he first made contact with her online. You address an interesting point tho that he really was not smart in trying to hide any of this, but they say when people are desperate they make mistakes. Maybe he thought he planned it out well, maybe he used a private server which the FBI was able to crack, but which he thought would conceal his online activity. I can think of one off hand which a stupid person might think would protect them. But this assumption would be dead wrong.:shame:
I respectfully disagree that there was no taunting and humiliation. NICOLE might have thought she was in an online/IRL fun and mutual relationship, but the relationship was not sincere on DE's part. That alone is taunting her and humiliating her. I can envision the two perps laughing at whatever NK posted. But even if they didn't laugh, DE and NK certainly planned to murder the child and used SM to make it happen. To me, planning a murder is taunting and humiliating, even when Nicole thought she was going on a "date." The child was used, pure and simple, and being used is humiliating, even if Nicole didn't recognize it.
As I've said, I currently do not believe they killed Nicole to silence her. But if evidence shows that to be true, of course I will change my mind.
For the time being, I think DE and NK got their kicks from planning a thrill kill.
JMOpinion at the moment.