Daddy pushed their head too hard into the stainless steel refrigerator could be an accidental death, too.
That's not accidental, it's murder. The child died in the commission of an assault.
Daddy pushed their head too hard into the stainless steel refrigerator could be an accidental death, too.
An accidental death could be a smack that was harder than intended that led to a skull fracture. No death or permanent harm was intended, but it would still be some kind of manslaughter or child endangerment something.
One of the biggest theories in the JonBenet case is that her parents or brother unintentionally killed her (w/ a blunt object) and then there was a coverup involving garrotte, strangulation, ransom note, etc to make it look like some intruder. So I am very confused as to why everyone is saying it never happens? Maybe it depends on how we are defining an accident. Plus, what about cases like Baby Sabrina or Baby Lisa? If you think the parents did it, do you think they planned to murder their baby, or that maybe it happened by accident/unintentionally, and then dumped the body, and pretended someone came into the house?
I think people are talking about a true accident. Not a child dying during an event of assault or abuse. For example, a parent not seeing a child in the driveway and reversing over them. A child who accidentally got hold of antifreeze while helping dad in the garage. A child who dies in their sleep, a child who chokes, etc. Of course, there are cases where a child dies from a parent's harm and they make it look like an abduction or murder. But, I don't recall a parent doing that when a child died from a true accident, that didn't involve a parent bringing any harm to the child.
Okay, I understand. So basically, the difference between an incident where the parent would likely see some jailtime and one where they wouldn't, or would get neglect charges v. manslaughter/murder charges.
What I find fascinating is in all the years I have been here at WS I never heard of the theory that the child was killed accidentally and then the parent or parents hid the body. That seem to become a theory after the Anthony case.
One of the biggest theories in the JonBenet case is that her parents or brother unintentionally killed her (w/ a blunt object) and then there was a coverup involving garrotte, strangulation, ransom note, etc to make it look like some intruder. So I am very confused as to why everyone is saying it never happens? Maybe it depends on how we are defining an accident. Plus, what about cases like Baby Sabrina or Baby Lisa? If you think the parents did it, do you think they planned to murder their baby, or that maybe it happened by accident/unintentionally, and then dumped the body, and pretended someone came into the house?
I can think of at least one other case where a parent (or step-parent) may have hid a body. This is an old case, and was never solved. The boy allegedly never came home from school - also a kindergartner. Investigation showed he never actually made it to school or onto the bus that morning. Step-mom was the POI and was arrested, but released due to lack of evidence. The child's body was found on the family property, hidden in a camper, and it was his father who located him.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...s-Corner-5-March-1989&highlight=justin+turner
Strangulation is not an accident. He was murdered, not died accidentally and then hid.
Thank you. I am glad you understand what I am saying.
We are not talking about murderers who discard and hid a child's body. Of course they have done that but the subject I was trying to convey is there isn't one bit of proof a parent discards/hides their child who has genuinely died from an accident. A COD found by the ME. It just doesn't happen. IMO
When bodies are hidden the reason for that is the person who put them there knows they are the sole cause of them being dead. So they hide to deceive that fact.
IMO
I think we've all wracked our brains, wanting to believe this to be an accident, trying to ignore rumors, trying to read through LE's brief messages, wondering why no statement from the parents, etc. I think I'm going to have to back off for a little bit, if I can. From what I gather nothing else will be forthcoming until after the funeral services. I'll wait to see what happens then, but will be checking in periodically because I simply can't get Noah's death off my mind.
Strangulation is not an accident. He was murdered, not died accidentally and then hid.
Actually children do strangle themselves by accident. The item that strangled him was a thin material, similar to a dog leash, the autopsy showed. Dog hair was found clutched in his hand. A dog did live in the home and there were leashes in the home, as well. So hypothetically, he could have accidentally strangled himself with the dog leash. (I don't know the type or size of the dog in the home) Or he could have been murdered while holding onto the dog in terror. The dog hair got in his hand somehow. I do not mean to sound argumentative - just stating that accidental strangulation does happen to kids. I've read of a few happening while hanging from a bunk bed. So in my opinion, it is not a given that he was deliberately murdered. And apparently the Grand Jury didn't think so either, as they didn't find enough evidence to charge the step-mother.
Daddy pushed their head too hard into the stainless steel refrigerator could be an accidental death, too.