I am going to bring over the list of ways I previously posted that lay out the possible ways Noah ended up in the septic tank. Please feel free to suggest any other ways that I may have not thought of, as well as your thoughts on why or why not any can be ruled out.
Noah fell into the septic tank while playing outside, without any extenuating circumstances. - **my problem(s) with this still being considered a scenario are listed below, based on the facts as we know them, as well as what we know about determining CODs and what we know about the legal aspects**
Either he took something himself and fell in the tank and drowned.
He was given something and fell in the tank and drowned.
He was given something and was put in the tank and drowned.
He was given something and died and his body placed in the tank.
He took something himself and was put in the tank and drowned.
He took something himself, died and his body was placed in the tank
He had some other accident and his body placed in the tank.
He was killed unintentionally as the result of some type of abuse and his body placed in the tank
He was killed intentionally and placed in the tank.
***If Noah's death was purely accidental, we have to consider these things. Noah was unsupervised, wandered outside and fell in the septic tank. COD would be drowning. In this case, the lungs would be full of water, waste, sludge from the tank. If it were obvious by the presence of septic tank water in his lungs, then the tox reports would not be so important, we wouldn’t be “waiting” on them. Also, Ashley’s denial of bond and the judge’s assertion that it was “unthinkable” that Ashley should be around ANY child at this point, tells us that there is more to this than an unsupervised child falling into a septic tank just because he was unsupervised. If that were the case, why would Ashley potentially be a danger to her Uncle’s 11 year old daughter? She is not responsible for that child, so whether or not Ashley would supervise this child is a moot point. Plus, this is an 11 year old, not a young child likely to wander off and fall into a septic tank.
This is what effectively rules out the chances of Noah falling into the tank accidentally as a result of being unsupervised:
1. COD would be drowning – lungs filled with septic tank water, not just plain water, and easily determined at initial autopsy.
2. Ashley’s denial of bond twice, with the Judge’s statement about her not being around any child. Unsupervised children have accidents all the time. They are not usually held without bond, even after appeal, pending toxicology results.
Lid ON or lid OFF, it doesn’t even matter, the septic tank water’s presence or absence in the lungs would tell if this were accidental. And, they would be able to determine, based upon the alveolar changes/damage in the lungs, whether the septic tank water was inhaled during the course of a drowning, or if it seeped in post mortem.
The only possible thing they could be waiting for on the tox report, if the autopsy showed that the act of drowning took place inside the septic tank, would be to determine if he had drugs in his system when he fell in or was placed in
If Noah’s COD was determined to be drowning, but the water in his lungs that is responsible for the drowning itself was determined to be water from another location (pond, bathtub, etc.), then it is only possible that Noah drowned/was drowned elsewhere and then his body placed in the tank.
Again, it does not matter if the lid was on or off, bolted or not, covered in sod or not.
If Noah's death was purely accidental, and the story above is true, these parents are guilty of nothing but leaving their children alone one time for 15-30 minutes, and smoking a joint (Paul). As I see it, the charges just don't jive with this scenario.
Nor the denial of bond. Twice for Ashley.
Nor the judge's statements about Ashley being around children.
Nor the need to even worry about Ashley being a flight risk. If it was an accident, why does it matter?
Nor the idea that LE is holding the parents, waiting to prove for sure that this is an accident.
We have at least one family member saying they were drug addicts, and we have one insider saying they absolutely were not. I'm just going to say that they cancel each other out because I don't have the information to give one of their word any more weight than the other.
Any suggestions or anything I left out?