- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 1,199
- Reaction score
- 77
Maybe I just don't get this sort of thing, but once the first shootings happened and they knew there was someone on campus with a gun why did they hold class as usual?
Maybe I just don't get this sort of thing, but once the first shootings happened and they knew there was someone on campus with a gun why did they hold class as usual?
Shadow205, it sounds like you were pretty close. 32+ 21= 53. Too close to 60 if you ask me.
On the 9mm how many bullets in a clip? He had two weapons.
Some were shot in one building and some in another two hours later, allowing plenty of time for a reload. And he could also have had extra pre loaded clips.
On the 9mm how many bullets in a clip? He had two weapons.
If he used high capacity clips, a 9mm can hold 16 rounds typically. That's 32 bullets, but I can't imagine he was that good of a shot that he killed everyone with one round. He had to reload.
A poster over at CTV has posted a link to a myspace page that is alledgedly the shooter. There are some comments posted on the my pics that are calling him the shooter.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=103371055
Nice numbers at Vtech dude, I give props! Rest in Peace
So, your the guy that killed all those people at Va Tech ?? Guess I shouldn't have left the question marks....Since your dead and all.....
Maybe I just don't get this sort of thing, but once the first shootings happened and they knew there was someone on campus with a gun why did they hold class as usual?
Shadow205, it sounds like you were pretty close. 32+ 21= 53. Too close to 60 if you ask me.
On the 9mm how many bullets in a clip? He had two weapons.
Some were shot in one building and some in another two hours later, allowing plenty of time for a reload. And he could also have had extra pre loaded clips.
If he lined most of them up and shot them one by one execution style, I can see where it would be one shot per person.
Side note: Something strange is going on. I made this post at 3:58 pm, but it is posting at 3:07 pm and putting the post in chronological order for the incorrect time.
thanks goodness someone is seeing this problem besides me...whew!!!!