Amber left her purse in the house and supposedly she used Dave Schaller (her pimp in all reality)'s cellphone but he claimed she deleted the number before giving the phone back to him. This says two things to me. One, as Emre pointed out, you wouldnt leave your purse and makeup if you were goin on an overnight date like Dave Schaller claims, so I think this is a lie. She wasn;t going on an overnight. I personally believe she was going out to the car to meet a heroin dealer. Part of me things DS might have been payed off to lie for the small price of a couple bricks of heroin, his story just doesnt add up.
2. Or if DS is telling the truth, then Amber deleted the number because it was someone who Dave Schaller knew, and she didnt want him to know she was going to meet in the car. It just doesnt add up. She didnt bring her purse on an overnight date?! Come on! I think DS is full of ****!
Linzi you are fantastic when you think but I believe you just can't shake the Hannibal Lecter illusion pushed since the beginning of the case, an effort I believe an excuse for failures made/to be made in the entire case starting from Shannan Gilbert's disappearance.
Now, facts:
Sunday, 6th of June 2010, 01:30 AM
Megan walks out of the hotel to go to the concession store.
Here's the hotel; 40°48'27.63" - 73°13'16.54" and here's the concession store 40°48'29.65" - 73°13'3.37".
I can post you links to back these things up. I can also post you some news outlets defining the area to be seedy.
Now, go to google streetview, put yourself in Megan's shoes, walk the path she walked, see what she saw and get yourself vanished. You'll see exactly how it happened.
EDIT: And her image in the hotel security camera but not in the Mobil store (none as far as I know) tells she never made it to the store.
I've told it many times that Peter Brendt made an excellent work on examining her case. He's a great mind. Shortcoming with his theory is the perp being mainly racially driven, I believe I made a more plausible work with my analysis of the victimology.
Yesterday you come up with one of the most remarkable observations made on this case so far, connecting the dead men to the dead hookers. I was always avoiding to step into that realm (i.e. examining dead guys), thanks for opening my eyes.
Now, think what may have happened to Amber. Dave Schaller looks like a cool buddy but his eye witness testimony ends at a certain time. We don't know after that. She may have taken her purse and makeup as well, Schaller himself was not in his most sober patch and that leaves a big window of uncertainty about the time she was kidnapped.
Please keep trying to connect things, because I find great insight in you. Big question, what the heck is summertime? Is it possible that this guy goes in and out of jail or something? I wouldn't say rehab because the work is too neat for an addict.