No. Unfortunately it was a group that he is a member of that shared their sons announcement regarding the Celebration of Life.
Absolutely heartbreaking. [emoji22]
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
No. Unfortunately it was a group that he is a member of that shared their sons announcement regarding the Celebration of Life.
So after all these days of going around with this we come down to the only plausible explanation is: some kind of attack happened while Cheryl was still parked at the library or possibly on the path. Does that sound about right?
ETA: no, it wouldn't be the path. She wouldn't have left her car. She was heading back home.
When an adult goes missing and is then found dead, although there are endless scenarios and possibilities, in general there are only a few causes:
1. Voluntarily Missing (Runaway): With Cheryl's body being found it is clear she didn't 'run off to Mexico' to start a new life. This theory/cause can't be true.
2. Suicide: Obviously sleuths on this thread are divided as to whether she did or did not commit suicide. I'd love to know how many people felt she committed suicide before they read about the 'self inflicted cuts'. The wording of that statement makes it sound as if Cheryl had been in the habit of harming herself or had harmed herself on that morning. Although that wording tweaked the idea of suicide in my mind, I really think it was meant to imply that the cuts were superficial, and caused by normal activities (such as an accident with knife or scissors) as compared to defensive wounds or injuries caused by an attacker. It is strange that the information about the cuts would even be released to the public, if it is in fact unrelated to the case. Perhaps those were the only marks/injuries on her body. With the family reporting no history of mental illness or drug/alcohol abuse, and Cheryl texting that she would 'probably ride home with her carpool (future plans) it seems unlikely (but not impossible) that she committed suicide. Dead bodies can't hide themselves. So if she did kill herself she would have had to do so in the culvert or in a place where she could fall/roll/stumble into the culvert. Toxicology results may help here.
3. Accident: Sometimes people fall off cliffs or get drunk and drown in lakes. When their body is found it might be unclear at first if it is an accident, suicide, or homicide. Based on where Cheryl was found in relation to her car I can't think of any plausible scenario that would account for an accidental death involving no foul play. If she was struck by a vehicle walking to the bus someone might have scooped up her body and disposed of it--but autopsy would have revealed more injuries and possibly forensic evidence at the scene of the accident. And that would not explain blood in her vehicle. It think there is no, or very low, possibility she died accidentally.
4. Abduction/Murder: MSM makes it seem as though there is evidence of Cheryl being alive and well on her way to work around 7:00am. Although it never explicitly says that Cheryl can be seen on video, or seen driving her car, the implication is there. The implication is also there that Cheryl sent the text about forgetting her badge--although some will debate. Since Cheryl didn't make it home to get her badge, and didn't make it to work that day, the most likely scenario is that she was abducted and murdered shortly after sending the text (her phone was reportedly powered down shortly after the message). I wonder if the autopsy has pinpointed a time of death (did she die soon after the text or many days later), and how long she was in the culvert (dumped on the first day or closer to the day she was found)? I think there is a high probability she was abducted and murdered, but why (motive) and who (random stranger versus friend/acquaintance/coworker/neighbour)?
I know that CD's husband was shown by surveillance to have left the house at 6:50, but did it also show her leaving for sure minutes later? Anyone know? Thx!!
The buses at this station, are they city buses that make multiple stops or express buses?
The buses at this station, are they city buses that make multiple stops or express buses?
They are right on the highway, so I am assuming that if not all express buses, they would at least certainly be in the mix. I am going to take the long way to work tomorrow and go by all these places.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The only time Cheryl would have been stopped would be before she left home, stop signs or lights (if any), pulled over to text (possibly at library.) Abduction requires to stop unless the perp was already in the car.
@teatime Cheryl is shown leaving her house on surveillance that morning. How could she be in the culvert when she's physically on camera?
Her car was quite small, and the windows were not tinted. I have a hard time believing she wouldn't easily spot someone in the car.Interesting point to ponder--that the abductor was already in the car. Can anyone confirm if her vehicle was parked in a locked, enclosed garage, or if it was in a carport, on a driveway or street on the morning she left for work?
Still, I think she met up with foul play when she stopped to make the text. She may have gotten out of her vehicle to check her trunk for the badge, or check in a purse/bag in her backseat. She may have been overtaken as she got back in, or somebody could have jumped in the passenger side when she was either texting or searching for the badge.
Did you read the article? It states that Cheryl is shown leaving a few minutes later. I posted the article and quote twice, along with steelman.DatelineFan - unless this information was released today, the last I read is that the house surveillance camera catures Me. DeBoer leaving the house at 6:45am and a car that looks like Cheryl's was captured on a traffic cam or other surveillance camera at the intersection of 268th St. SW and 58th Ave., heading west.
There was no mention of her being seen in the car or leaving her house. Did I miss something?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.