so you think the police wouldve said if her car was seen on video a second time if someone else was seen in it? that makes sense. perp couldve wanted to avoid main roads, though, and with that, cameras/eye witnesses. if i committed a crime, i would want to take the least driven routes and avoid people at all costs. i would drive her car down 234th or 235th (whichever one is closer) until i couldnt go anymore, turn right, and just keep going until i found a decent place. i suppose maybe he would drive her car so he wouldnt have her dna in his car and to avoid being caught transferring her from car to car by a neighbor (thats too risky imho). or he would drive his own car so he wouldnt leave his dna in her car and if she was reported missing earlier wouldnt be caught in her car. either way i see being likely. either way has high risk...unless she was already in his car, but then how does that explain the blood in her car. what time was her car found again, noon? so do you not believe she was ever on the trail? the trail leaves good cover to commit a crime, thats why i think it was committed there, plus everything else her family and the police said.