RubyRed
"Keep on Truckin"
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,984
- Reaction score
- 146

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sou....887012,-115.740967&spn=4.848974,8.470459&z=7
Just two out of so many missing.
a fluke?
There are far to many examples, for it to be a fluke.
For there are many that want to come home.
And sometimes, we are there only way.
To fish here, hunt this way, dig here, swim here.
The young couple, experience car trouble after a long journey.
the man gets out and inspects the engine.
The woman gets out and leans against the guard rail for some fresh air.
As she glances below, she sees the little girl that has been missing for the past ten years, laying in the same spot for all those years.
The little girl, just wanted a ride home!
I mention the above, to always remind people, that when you go out on searches, remember the one your looking for, is not necessarily the one your going to find.
For there are others, who want to come home to.
Is this anywhere near Nancy Moyer?
Is this anywhere near Nancy Moyer?
http://www.kapptv.com/article/2010/sep/10/facial-reconstruction-may-identify-body-found-sunc/
Facial Reconstruction May Identify Body Found at Suncadia
It doesn't sound like they have anyone in mind as the victim.
The Daily Record reported that the area where the remains were found is bare dirt that was disturbed in 2002 for design work at Suncadia.
There are no missing women from Kittitas County since 2002. The sheriff’s office is working with neighboring counties, gathering information on missing persons cases.
http://www.examiner.com/headlines-i...dia-sent-for-testing-dental-records-submitted
So I guess that means we are looking for women missing after 2002.
... died sometime between the 1960s to early 1990s.
The area where the body was found was cleared back in 2002, which could have made it an easy place to bury a body, Myers said.
Don't these two lines seem inconsistent? If it was an easier place to bury a body after the area was cleared, wouldn't that seem to imply that the body was buried after 2002?
Don't these two lines seem inconsistent? If it was an easier place to bury a body after the area was cleared, wouldn't that seem to imply that the body was buried after 2002?