CorallaroC,
(Love your "hat" -very clever!) I just wanted to say thanks for pointing me to those posts re: Harry O.'s search for Lindsey, which I would not have seen otherwise. His comments are certainly disturbing:
(The following snip is an e-mail response from Harry Oakes to a poster at another site, who wrote to him to ask about the results of his search for Lindsey. Thanks to Tamikosmom, and apologies for the rip
>>>snip
RE: LINDSEY BAUM SEARCH‏
From: Harry Oakes ([email protected])
Sent: September 8, 2009 12:12:42 PM
we actually tracked up to Beck St then NE To a logging atv road and our search continues there. So far we've located two empty beer bottles, and a track (Scent trail) heading east 6 miles on either a motor cycle or ATV.
we are also (the search dogs) picking up a dead human alert 1/2 mile East of Beck the winds are coming from the south. I can't tell you about anything else we've found. That's been handed over to the McCleary Police.
Note: The death scent on a dead human could be from any "Dead Human" that has died in the area. Not neccessarily the missing child's scent.
Harry<<<snip
I'm confused by this, as Harry O seems to be saying two different things. I suppose both could be true, but...my understanding of search and rescue dogs (admittedly limited) is that each individual dog is trained to search for a specific kind of scent, and that a "tracking"-trained dog, who is given a scent to "track", would not "find" the scent of human remains, nor would a "cadaver dog" locate a scent trail, to track.
I took Harry O.'s "we" to mean Harry and his dog, but perhaps "we" means that there were other "Harrys" with differently trained dogs searching for Lindsey, as well?
If anybody can straighten me out here, I'd appreciate it.
One thing I do know: that e-mail ^ is the first I've heard of either (and both) a death scent being found, or (and) a scent trail 6 miles E. of Beck St.