WA - Lindsey Baum, 10, McCleary, 26 June 2009 - #13

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #401
....hope for news from LE soon....until then....well....i will be working out a bit.....
headspin.gif

Good Night TakeNote, I'm going to crawl in too and hope for more news on the morrow. I know I'll probably wake up out of a dream where I drive past the case task center in Montesano to see if they are burning the midnight oil. ;}
 
  • #402
This is something I just believe has happened that I didn't read anywhere, OK. It is alright to theorize, I know that.

I think there was another SW that was signed by a judge and served today and no one knew nothing about it or expected it. They all thought the hoopala was for those 2 properties searched on Fri and Sat.

That is all I can say. But I'll bet 'cha dimes to donuts we will see this is what happened. And I might also add that it involves going back to the scene of the crime, or very close to it. I think the investigators did that and learned allot which led to getting this weekends warrants. Just a gut feeling from all that I have learned tonight. xoxox

Remember, Dimes to Donuts and I'll take the dimes Ya Ya ;}


PS: It might also be that LE should have listened to Jvk when he was a photographin around the town and found a place on Maple they had not searched!

Bolded by me: You say you're just theorizing - so let me tell you why and how it becomes so confusing.

I try to always read the threads and will catch up if possible on all the comments. Sometimes - out of nowhere - a place, a scenerio, etc will become the major topic...and I have no idea where the information came from. Maybe about 3-4 pages later I read that the info came from the Astro threads - and that they are never wrong, 100% right. I am a scientist and believe in the gravitational pull of our planets and galaxies, so I don't dismiss what is said. My education never included much about our galaxies so I know little about it all. As a result, I don't feel comfortable interpreting what they say. We don't all have the same proclivity toward readings of the Astro threads...some are studying it and others read and bring those ideas over as their own. That's what is confusing. Tonight when I read about the bathing suit, I thought the information came from the Astro threads and thought of it as important information, especially since it is said they are never wrong. I gave my thoughts about the information only to find out it was brought over from the Chimp threads. I am NOT a tabloid person, nor do I engage in gossip, that's the way I was brought up. However, when theorizing or giving my opinions, they are indeed mine and are not from another thread or web site...if they are, I will give credit where credit is due.

Quite some time ago, I included KK's comments in my time-line and the entire TL was deleted by a mod. I was told we were NOT to bring over conversations from another thread so I redid the time-line so it was acceptable. I agree - theorizing is great, okay, wonderful, and important, but when it comes from nowhere and is not backed up, it becomes confusing - especially when the information comes from sources not identified. Thanks and I hope this explains my confusion and I hope noone is offended. Everyone have a wonderful Monday.
 
  • #403
Bolded by me: You say you're just theorizing - so let me tell you why and how it becomes so confusing.

I try to always read the threads and will catch up if possible on all the comments. Sometimes - out of nowhere - a place, a scenerio, etc will become the major topic...and I have no idea where the information came from. Maybe about 3-4 pages later I read that the info came from the Astro threads - and that they are never wrong, 100% right. I am a scientist and believe in the gravitational pull of our planets and galaxies, so I don't dismiss what is said. My education never included much about our galaxies so I know little about it all. As a result, I don't feel comfortable interpreting what they say. We don't all have the same proclivity toward readings of the Astro threads...some are studying it and others read and bring those ideas over as their own. That's what is confusing. Tonight when I read about the bathing suit, I thought the information came from the Astro threads and thought of it as important information, especially since it is said they are never wrong. I gave my thoughts about the information only to find out it was brought over from the Chimp threads. I am NOT a tabloid person, nor do I engage in gossip, that's the way I was brought up. However, when theorizing or giving my opinions, they are indeed mine and are not from another thread or web site...if they are, I will give credit where credit is due.

Quite some time ago, I included KK's comments in my time-line and the entire TL was deleted by a mod. I was told we were NOT to bring over conversations from another thread so I redid the time-line so it was acceptable. I agree - theorizing is great, okay, wonderful, and important, but when it comes from nowhere and is not backed up, it becomes confusing - especially when the information comes from sources not identified. Thanks and I hope this explains my confusion and I hope noone is offended. Everyone have a wonderful Monday.

Hi Eyes, Thanks for your thoughts and am sorry as I didn't mean to confuse. I do see your point which is well taken IMO.

I did read the day's posts over there, but what I wrote in the above post wasn't included in any of those. There was nothing written about a possible 3rd SW and just a thought I had. Yes, the thought stemmed partially from what I deduced could have happened from reading there but in keeping with our rules was careful not to repeat what I had read there.

I take that back, as there were several locals talking about how rowdy the people were in the downtown watering hole/s, angry and making threats to do someone harm. I figured that didn't involve the workings of the case so was OK to mention. Maybe not. xox
 
  • #404
Bolded by me: You say you're just theorizing - so let me tell you why and how it becomes so confusing.

I try to always read the threads and will catch up if possible on all the comments. Sometimes - out of nowhere - a place, a scenerio, etc will become the major topic...and I have no idea where the information came from. Maybe about 3-4 pages later I read that the info came from the Astro threads - and that they are never wrong, 100% right. I am a scientist and believe in the gravitational pull of our planets and galaxies, so I don't dismiss what is said. My education never included much about our galaxies so I know little about it all. As a result, I don't feel comfortable interpreting what they say. We don't all have the same proclivity toward readings of the Astro threads...some are studying it and others read and bring those ideas over as their own. That's what is confusing. Tonight when I read about the bathing suit, I thought the information came from the Astro threads and thought of it as important information, especially since it is said they are never wrong. I gave my thoughts about the information only to find out it was brought over from the Chimp threads. I am NOT a tabloid person, nor do I engage in gossip, that's the way I was brought up. However, when theorizing or giving my opinions, they are indeed mine and are not from another thread or web site...if they are, I will give credit where credit is due.

Quite some time ago, I included KK's comments in my time-line and the entire TL was deleted by a mod. I was told we were NOT to bring over conversations from another thread so I redid the time-line so it was acceptable. I agree - theorizing is great, okay, wonderful, and important, but when it comes from nowhere and is not backed up, it becomes confusing - especially when the information comes from sources not identified. Thanks and I hope this explains my confusion and I hope noone is offended. Everyone have a wonderful Monday.



I have been hoping someone did a timeline which puts everything out in a format to be used as a reference. Would you care to point me in the direction to locate your timeline? Please.

Novice Seeker
 
  • #405
I have been hoping someone did a timeline which puts everything out in a format to be used as a reference. Would you care to point me in the direction to locate your timeline? Please.

Novice Seeker

Hi Novice Seeker - if you click on top 'Lindsey Balm' it will take you to all the Lindsey threads. The time-line was almost off the page so I made a comment bringing it back toward the top. Just click time-line on and scroll to the TL. It was done a long time ago, but still pretty accurate. sure hope to change it soon and ending it with 'arrest'!.
 
  • #406
Hi Novice Seeker - if you click on top 'Lindsey Balm' it will take you to all the Lindsey threads. The time-line was almost off the page so I made a comment bringing it back toward the top. Just click time-line on and scroll to the TL. It was done a long time ago, but still pretty accurate. sure hope to change it soon and ending it with 'arrest'!.

I found it thanks a bunch. I tend to prefer something like a time frame as a reference point. It helps with the thought process

Novice Seeker
 
  • #407
It is really difficult to discuss things when you have a poster at another site who claims they are speaking for the person involved directly in the search and we can't discuss it. And you are right, Eyes...we couldn't use something that supposedly came from one of those horse's mouths who was definitely involved and the things they said for the timeline. It does get very frustrating at times. I understand the reasons for it, but at the same time...it limits us a great deal on what is really going on in McCleary.

You did a great job on the timeline and I do hope soon you can add an arrest! The pieces are starting to fit, imo. Sometimes rumors are just rumors and other times...they are facts that have not been released to the public.
 
  • #408
I am SOO VERY GLAD that there are standards here! (just came from reading all the allegations 'over yonder') I truly hope today is the day for the truth to come out and bring Lindsey home.
 
  • #409
I hope we get some real news today instead of speculation and rumors. :banghead: Where is Lindsey?
 
  • #410
I haven't read the "rumors" being posted elsewhere.. but there were rumors started on friday. I was getting text messages from people at noon asking if it was true that *such and such* was found or *so and so* was arrested.
I told people then that they needed to stop talking to the people around town and wait until the LE or the media gave the official information.

I haven't heard either one confirm any of the rumors I've heard so, in my opinion the information being talked about are rumors. Nothing more.
 
  • #411
Is there anyway we can stop the nonsense about other sites and concentrate on what is going on here......
 
  • #412
Where can the SW info be found once it becomes public information?
 
  • #413
I have been checking the local media sites, but have found nothing yet. I would have to assume one of them will be on it PDQ.

They said it would be released in five days. Was that "business days" or just five days?
 
  • #414
  • #415
I would like to see these other "dozens" of search warrants that have been issued:

Pimentel noted that although the search warrants are getting a lot of attention, the Sheriff’s Office has “served dozens of search warrants” during the course of the three-month investigation. - snipped

full article: http://www.thedailyworld.com/articles/2009/09/27/local_news/doc4abf03c936aa2261426446.txt

Hhhmmm. You are right, I would think that in a town that size, the locals would know about them. Shoot, I heard about a search warrant that is GOING TO be released this week in my town! (That's how small towns are...you hear about it BEFORE it happens!)
 
  • #416
Off Topic: Glad to see you back after your "ride along", Kimster!! I guess it means everything went well and your ray gun was either effective or unnecessary last night. LOL

On Topic: I agree, Boondock! Where ARE the other search warrants? Maybe the media needs to get busy if they were all released after five days! WTH?
 
  • #417
There is a rumor thread in the parking lot for Haleigh's case, would that help here?
 
  • #418
Off Topic: Glad to see you back after your "ride along", Kimster!! I guess it means everything went well and your ray gun was either effective or unnecessary last night. LOL

O/T...Thanks SS! Although we aren't allowed to give details about the ride, I did give a general account of it in the Jury Room :-) I spent some time in the dispatch center - my deputy was kind enough to take me there - and have made some comments about dispatch in case there are those who like to sleuth on scanners.

Carry on - let's find Lindsey!
 
  • #419
There is a rumor thread in the parking lot for Haleigh's case, would that help here?

The Mods have to make that decision so go ahead and ask them. Parking lot threads are a lot to maintain and other issues go into them as well, so they need to be approved beforehand for that reason.

ETA: I'm only talking about threads that extend from general forums. Hope that makes sense.
 
  • #420
There is a rumor thread in the parking lot for Haleigh's case, would that help here?

I, for one, would not support this idea. I don't feel we need it. Reading at other sites is an individual decision, but for me, and me only, I find it wastes my time and the nonsense that goes on is frustrating. Rumors are just rumors. If there is any substance to them, it will generally be discovered and come out in the media, as long as we keep the media stirred up.

We have already seen, here on the Lindsey thread, how some rumors have attacked our own posters. Not a good thing in my opinion. The poster was hurt and frustrated - and it was uncalled for. We, who post with this person, know her reputation here at WS and on the ground in McCleary. That she even felt it was necessary to defend herself was troubling to me. We know her for the good and decent person she is.

So.... for what it is worth, I don't support those rumor threads. I think they just lead to dissention and unnecessary trouble.

This is my own opinion - I don't mean to offend anyone. If you like the rumors, that's okay with me. It's just that I don't and I would hate to see Lindsey's thread end up in the parking lot based on a lot of unfounded nonsense and trouble making.

Salem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
2,744
Total visitors
2,804

Forum statistics

Threads
632,691
Messages
18,630,592
Members
243,258
Latest member
WhateverForever
Back
Top