WA - Lindsey Baum, 10, McCleary, 26 June 2009 - #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
Great! What "discovery" were you talking about?
 
  • #222
Has anyone found any more information on "Derek"...the SO who was arrested around the first?? Just wondering cause I'm not so great when it comes to finding new info....still feeling like a newbie.
~

Hi DogMom ~ Love your dogs...especially that guy in the background :)

To answer your question (I don't think anyone picked up on it and I'm sorry to repeat post if someone did) according to the Sheriffs office DRL is still incarcerated with No Bail.

It's no wonder, they keep letting him out, and he keeps finding his way back in there, Thank God!

You can see it here:
http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/InmateDetail.asp?SrchNameNo=36241

and here:
http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/DailyRegister.asp

Hope this helps ~
 
  • #223
  • #224
I remember now what I was probably referring to. One person owns 2 properties on the south side of Maple, between 4th and 5th. One of these could be a "rental" property. I asked my source to see if they could find out who is the "renter" if any.

In google earth you can see the property, it is the middle larger area between 2 other properties, a total of 4 "properties" but 2 belonging to one individual, meaning that there are a total of 5 possible dwellings. I can only see one dwelling on the "AC" property [initials of owner] (actually 2 properties) but one longish dwelling [slightly back from the 3rd dwelling from left] could possibly be a rental place, or AC may not actually live there and is renting out the dwelling.

Are you confused yet? I am. However, this time I'm not tired so I have no apparent excuse.
 
  • #225
Here is a clip from google earth of the possible rental area.
rental.jpg

Renters can be transient sorts so I thought it would be interesting to see if I could discover who exactly was renting -- if at all -- at the time of LB's disappearance.
 
  • #226
What page is that on SS so I can be sure of the reference context, thanks.
I couldn't find it, but what you said was that you were "sad about the discovery".
 
  • #227
I'm remembering what momtective put up on the thread...he was a 69yo pedophile who looked like a trusted old grampa, white hair, short and round. His name is Thomas H. Aaron from Shelton, Wa., he served about six years in prison for violent sexual attacks on 2 little girls (two different girls and times).

He is about 5'6" and 200 lbs., he could also come across as a jolly santa. Momtective called that tip into the police 'cause she traced him to a possible relative on 6th & Fir., or very close by. He could have been visiting family that evening. I hope she also called that tip into the FBI!!! If a pedophile is visiting family in Mccleary and casually bumped into Lindsey over time, I think that would also be an explanation of how she could just disappear...especially in the area of 6th and Fir. I went back to look for his mug shot but couldn't find it. I think he really fits the picture. mho

Level II Sex Offender

Aaron, Thomas H




Thomas H Aaron

05/20/40

Male

5' 06"

170 lbs

Gray

Green
100 block of SE Harmony Ln, Shelton, WA

ETA Thomas H Aaron has recently moved into Mason County after being released from McNeil Island Corrections Center. He has to register as a sex offender for two convictions of Child Molestation 1st degree, Mason County Superior Court cause # 96-1-002127. These convictions stem from him having sexual contact with two young females, 5 years of age and 9 years of age. At different times, these victims were at AARON�s residence being babysat. AARON pled guilty to the charges. He was unable to attend sex offender treatment. He is currently on supervision with the Department of Corrections. Due to these factors he is considered a MODERATE RISK.
Thomas H Aaron is assessed by the Mason County Sheriff�s Office as a Level II Sex Offender.
This is the Mid-level given to a Sex Offender, meaning that the subject is at a MODERATE RISK to re-offend.
 
  • #228
I couldn't find it, but what you said was that you were "sad about the discovery".

I'd have to see the context as I've been pouring over a ton of things in the past 2 days. I could have been referring to "sadness" related to not getting information I expected (such as a possible SO living in one of the properties -- i.e. one property lists "JF" and "JF" [both males with the same surname] as living on the NW corner of Maple and 5th, actual address not "Maple" but "5th". I was really hoping that something could be found in a records check concerning that home. Nothing could be found.

Again, I have been sad about a number of "discoveries" lately, but the discovery definitely had nothing to do with LB specifically. Again, my only excuse is being dog tired and I will definitely make sure that I am more "specific" about future comments.

I'm a beginner, I'm learning, and I again apologize to the veterans out there, including yourself SS
 
  • #229
  • #230
Awww~ Really...I was concerned about your safety, too. Uhm...kinda...well...er (shuffles feet). :blowkiss: Big tough guy like you n all...just sayin...

Thanks SS. I am former NG, 5th Cav Scout, so I feel pretty safe. I am used to stealth work. I can sneak out pretty quietly. My wife always slaps me on the arm when I walk up on her because I am so quiet, she doesn't like to be surprised. I honestly don't do it on purpose, it's like second nature. Leftover from experience. lol
 
  • #231
~

Hi DogMom ~ Love your dogs...especially that guy in the background :)

To answer your question (I don't think anyone picked up on it and I'm sorry to repeat post if someone did) according to the Sheriffs office DRL is still incarcerated with No Bail.

It's no wonder, they keep letting him out, and he keeps finding his way back in there, Thank God!

You can see it here:
http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/InmateDetail.asp?SrchNameNo=36241

and here:
http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/DailyRegister.asp

Hope this helps ~


I missed the original post.. but I have unofficial information (not released to the public) that DRL was questioned about Lindsey and it is "believed that he is not involved"
He is being held on other charges.. nothing related to Lindsey.
 
  • #232
I just searched through this thread and can find nothing mentioning a "discovery" by Norm or anyone else...am I wrong here?

I think Norm's a bit odd but I'll chalk it up to lack of sleep as s/he says. Besides, we're all odd.
 
  • #233
I just searched through this thread and can find nothing mentioning a "discovery" by Norm or anyone else...am I wrong here?

I think Norm's a bit odd but I'll chalk it up to lack of sleep as s/he says. Besides, we're all odd.


LOL We are all a bit odd in that we are so caught up in sleuthing. But we all read the post so it must have been deleted.
 
  • #234
He (or the mods) deleted the posts.. I knew I should have screen capped them.
If they were deleted by the mods then we couldn't repost them.
 
  • #235
Hi Norm, It was especially unnerving to read that and I am having a hard time relating that to a 'possible' rental' property you have found where there is no known connection to the case. No RSO living there that we know, nor a friend of the family or one of her friends house, etc. IMO that would be the discovery of a new connection in the case.. The normal thing a sleuther would think of when reading your comment would be the discovery of a body. It is elemental 2 + 2 IMO.

Couple what you wrote together with the fact that not long afterwards a helicopter was going back and forth, back and forth on the south side of HWY 8 directly south of McCleary, we were wondering how you would have received news of a 'discovery'. You have to understand we are talking about a missing child here who has been gone far too many days to think of her being safe somewhere, playing along with her captor, having a game of chess with him even though we all want her to be found alive and well.

Being hopeful with positivity is something we all have here. But when it points to how a 65 lb girl is coping with her abductor who IMO must have taken her for illicit activity on his part, it falls into a realm of awe and shock for those reading the things you wrote. xox

I appreciate your concern; however, I was not the one who posted about the "helicopter" as I checked that out myself. As well, I cannot find a post where I suggested anything about "discovery" and I have gone through this entire 6th thread. :confused: I'm not saying that I "didn't" use that phrase but it certainly shouldn't be interpreted as sinister. I hope if the mods deleted some things that there is some way to bring them back so I can perhaps explain my intent. I am, as some claim, perhaps a bit "odd" in my ways of conversing. I'm a musician, a poet, and a photographer, when I get tired I sometimes revert to creativity rather than objectivity, which should clearly be the reference point here.

As well, the "she sees you" and "make sure you see her" refers to a very tired individual being slightly poetic in the way that "if she is alive, then we are her helpers and we should ensure that we are doing everything possible to find [see] her." I won't use poetic license again.
 
  • #236
I appreciate your concern; however, I was not the one who posted about the "helicopter" as I checked that out myself. As well, I cannot find a post where I suggested anything about "discovery" and I have gone through this entire 6th thread. :confused: I'm not saying that I "didn't" use that phrase but it certainly shouldn't be interpreted as sinister. I hope if the mods deleted some things that there is some way to bring them back so I can perhaps explain my intent. I am, as some claim, perhaps a bit "odd" in my ways of conversing. I'm a musician, a poet, and a photographer, when I get tired I sometimes revert to creativity rather than objectivity, which should clearly be the reference point here.

As well, the "she sees you" and "make sure you see her" refers to a very tired individual being slightly poetic in the way that "if she is alive, then we are her helpers and we should ensure that we are doing everything possible to find [see] her." I won't use poetic license again.

I know Norm that you weren't here when the news of the helicopter was posted as you had already logged off.
 
  • #237
Norm, either you or the mods deleted the posts.

And no one said you mentioned the helicopter. But you posted things like "Lindsey sees you" and "make sure you see her" and something about a discovery... then not to long after that someone local mentioned there was a helicopter flying over McCleary.

Your posts alone are creepy.. combine that with helicopters and we were wondering what was "discovered" and it makes it even creepier.

I apologize for causing alarm to anyone here, Jennifer, and am doing my level best to find information that may help bring LB back. I do not delete posts, and assure you that I did not. If the mods chose to delete my posts I'm sure they did so for very good reasons, reasons that I in my tired state did not consider. The helicopter post is still up, I read it about 20 minutes ago. I was not the one who posted it.
 
  • #238
I apologize for causing alarm to anyone here, Jennifer, and am doing my level best to find information that may help bring LB back. I do not delete posts, and assure you that I did not. If the mods chose to delete my posts I'm sure they did so for very good reasons, reasons that I in my tired state did not consider. The helicopter post is still up, I read it about 20 minutes ago. I was not the one who posted it.

Hey normcar21,
I'm glad you are here at WS trying to make sense of the senseless just as the rest of us are. But I do have a couple of ?'s.
1. Do you live in McCleary or near there?
2. In checking the neighborhood and knowing that everyone appears to be on the up and up( not your post verbatim but you get the jest) did you happen to run across any RSO's which may be family members of the neighborhood peeps?
 
  • #239
My windows are open and I did stand there for a bit. Hmmm, as I am typing, it's coming back again. Going right over my house now. I live on the south east side of McCleary. No sirens, but it's sweeping the area. It went way east then came back from the east to the west. This time on the north side of the hwy 8.

I don't live anywhere near McCleary and have no relation with this poster.
 
  • #240
I deleted the posts due to them not making any sense and due to the alerts I got on them. Suffice it to say if a post disappears it is the mods call and is done for a reason that we do not have to give on a thread. I replied as a courtesy to those who had not read and were questioning why a mod would remove them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
133
Guests online
1,506
Total visitors
1,639

Forum statistics

Threads
632,442
Messages
18,626,557
Members
243,151
Latest member
MsCrystalKaye
Back
Top