Deceased/Not Found WA - Rachael Anderson, 40, Clarkston, 16 April 2010 - #1 *C. Capone guilty*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #341
Gosh - we have a:
8th street
3th street
Jefferson Street
Clarkston Street
Libby Street
An Idaho
A Washington
2 cars
I'm so confused
 
  • #342
On google maps, her street has street view, but there's a big tree in front that block the house.

"Someone" was probably walking around the block.


There's a pic of her house (capture) in the pb album, still on p1.
 
  • #343
141, if you don't mind, I am swiping that post from Ashley.
 
  • #344
  • #345
Poor Rachael, not even LE was able to help her. She was doing everything she should have done. I had not heard that news story amysmom. If you find it again can you link it for us?

s&bm

Here ya go Knox..It's around 1:30 mark..LE does NOT say "suspects" but my impression is they may? have been onto one or more ppl..IDK but then why just up & quit? Makes NO sense!


Rachael Anderson :: 4/19/10 Clarkston WA woman missing. Rachael Anderson was last seen 4/16/10, and reported missing by her daughters when she did not show up for work on Monday 4/19/10. video by crankycrankerson - Photobucket
 
  • #346
I don't think my logic is childlike at all - FACT IS - LE have not come out and said any one person has been cleared AND we have not used names, just initials associated in places LE have named. Sorry C, but I don't consider you to be the sleuthing police, so if you want to get a mod to come on board and have them wipe out this thread - be my guest!

bbm

ITA with you 'eyes' & I'm totally :waitasec: by what's considered to be against the 'rules' here even after doing over 2,000 posts :sleuth:
 
  • #347
I really hope the LE are aware all of the websleuth posts. There really are a lot of people on here, doing a lot of smart investigating. It is truly like the LE have so many extra hands helping here. I just wish the LE would in turn give us more information to work with so we could do an even better job helping. It is frustrating. Time, of course, is of the essence. The people of the LC Valley are so willing to do anything to help find Rachael. Knowledge is power.
 
  • #348
I don't think my logic is childlike at all - FACT IS - LE have not come out and said any one person has been cleared AND we have not used names, just initials associated in places LE have named. Sorry C, but I don't consider you to be the sleuthing police, so if you want to get a mod to come on board and have them wipe out this thread - be my guest!

I didn't say your logic was childlike. It seems more like trying to work around the rules with a wink and a nod. Everyone on this thread knows who the person is, and his initials were confirmed by a poster here who appears to be close to the situation (well, closer than most of us anyway).

Edit: you're right. I think it needs to be clarified. That would certainly make it easier on some of us.
 
  • #349
I really hope the LE are aware all of the websleuth posts. There really are a lot of people on here, doing a lot of smart investigating. It is truly like the LE have so many extra hands helping here. I just wish the LE would in turn give us more information to work with so we could do an even better job helping. It is frustrating. Time, of course, is of the essence. The people of the LC Valley are so willing to do anything to help find Rachael. Knowledge is power.

I absolutely agree with you, I wish they would help US somehow help THEM, it is very frustrating and yes time is of the essence. Those I talk to in the valley are frustrated at the lack of news and the lack of knowledge that is really out there. I am curious as to what will go down tomorrow once the FBI is involved!! Anyone have any ideas what that will mean/bring to the investigation?
 
  • #350
I wish this was getting more media attention and don't understand why it's not, even on a local level. I'm wondering if the searches are being held back because no one is sure where to search; WA, ID, OR? All people can really do is keep their eyes open and post fliers. This is so frustrating!
 
  • #351
I didn't say your logic was childlike. It seems more like trying to work around the rules with a wink and a nod. Everyone on this thread knows who the person is, and his initials were confirmed by a poster here who appears to be close to the situation (well, closer than most of us anyway). I simply pointed out what has been stated repeatedly by mods (and tricia) regarding "sleuthing" of persons not named POI or suspects; I've never read it to mean we can "sleuth" anyone we wish until they're cleared by the police. That makes no sense, as there are thousands in that area who haven't been cleared and never will be. If those rules don't apply here, then ok. It would certainly make it easier for most of us here if they were applied consistently.

C..I honestly can't remember not sleuthing ppl with a def connection to the victim..Especially a spouse or an X who we all know are the first ones LE looks at as the possible perp..When it comes to sleuthing 'minors' most know that's a def 'no-no' with no exceptions.

I'm truly stumped by your complaint & seriously feel like I'm missing something :waitasec:
 
  • #352
Just to add here to the "sleuthing" I wouldnt have "sleuthed" him had he NOT admitted to being her harasser ... but admitting that and knowing what we do know I guess maybe I see it differently..........
 
  • #353
C..I honestly can't remember not sleuthing ppl with a def connection to the victim..Especially a spouse or an X who we all know are the first ones LE looks at as the possible perp..When it comes to sleuthing 'minors' most know that's a def 'no-no' with no exceptions.

I'm truly stumped by your complaint & seriously feel like I'm missing something :waitasec:

My two cents and then back to the case, as I feel this is distracting.
We have done a very good job of keeping the sleuthing clean in this thread. No one reading here would know what we are speaking of without looking at public records. Salem nudged me for posting a comment from Facebook rather than linking to it (I blew it on that one), everything else we said appeared to be fine.
 
  • #354
Just to add here to the "sleuthing" I wouldnt have "sleuthed" him had he NOT admitted to being her harasser ... but admitting that and knowing what we do know I guess maybe I see it differently..........

Is there a link to confirm this? Or is this rumor going around locally? Sorry if I missed it.
 
  • #355
  • #356
I am new at this and am trying to learn the R & R of it all. Thank you all for being patient and for letting me know the cans and can nots of it all.
 
  • #357
I thought it was rumor, but was just asking to make sure. :) Didn't want to miss it if an article had come out to confirm. Thanks.

ETA: Yes, I agree that 1forevry1 has been good with her posts. Doing great for a new poster. :)
 
  • #358
Thank you for being here 141.
 
  • #359
I absolutely agree with you, I wish they would help US somehow help THEM, it is very frustrating and yes time is of the essence. Those I talk to in the valley are frustrated at the lack of news and the lack of knowledge that is really out there. I am curious as to what will go down tomorrow once the FBI is involved!! Anyone have any ideas what that will mean/bring to the investigation?

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=+1]FBI Capabilities[/SIZE][/FONT]

capabilities_animate.gif
Here are some of the investigative techniques and operational capabilities we use to solve cases and support our law enforcement partners. Also see What We Investigate for details on our areas of investigative expertise.

http://www.fbi.gov/aboutus/capabilities.htm

Probably not the specifics you had in mind, but may answer some general questions. In my mind I think there is some sort of indication Rachael was taken across state lines, also Local LE can ask for help from the FBI at anytime the federal criteria is met. Another thought, perhaps something was uncovered in the process of the investigation that the FBI needs to be involved in; Theorizing here not being specific, something like interstate business/insurance fraud, smuggling, chop-shop etc. All MOO!
 
  • #360
HOLY WOW! Looks like I have some work cut out for me before I can REALLY run with the big dogs! This is great!

I am thinking the FBI is going to be a BIG asset! Thank you for the information!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
53
Guests online
2,298
Total visitors
2,351

Forum statistics

Threads
633,535
Messages
18,643,406
Members
243,568
Latest member
M_Gibby2018
Back
Top