WA WA - Unk/Unk, 18-99, UP9541, skeletal, home construction, backpack, barrette, clothes, Tukwila Jan'97

  • #41
Im confused by that as well. I would like to write to the contact to see where this case stands. But I don't know if there is a reference number or other info that needs to be given? Sure wish someone who knows more here can send off a quick query?
Maybe they think they were a transgender because of the female cloth found near him?
Just my opinion
 
  • #42
No news so far, but I feel that thanks to his high matches on GEDmatch, he could have been identified. He is referred to as Tukwila Bones 03-342908 Doe 1997, and his NamUs profile is UP9541.
 
  • #43
I updated the title of this thread to reflect their race and sex as 'unknown'. Their NamUs profile lists them as male (last updated in 2011), but DDP still has their profile titled Jane Doe yet described as a male. Hopefully, their high matches have or will soon lead to an identification!
 
  • #44
The DDP page still showing as Research in Progress (and still showing as female), with the page having no updates since 2021.
 
  • #45
The DDP page still showing as Research in Progress (and still showing as female), with the page having no updates since 2021.
The DDP page was updated in December 2025, still Research in Progress
I updated the title of this thread to reflect their race and sex as 'unknown'. Their NamUs profile lists them as male (last updated in 2011), but DDP still has their profile titled Jane Doe yet described as a male. Hopefully, their high matches have or will soon lead to an identification!

Tukwila Bones Doe 1997 | DNA Doe Project no longer refers to them as a Jane Doe but as Tukwila Bones Doe ands lists them as male, while saying their age and race haven't been determined.
 
  • #46
The DDP page was updated in December 2025, still Research in Progress


Tukwila Bones Doe 1997 | DNA Doe Project no longer refers to them as a Jane Doe but as Tukwila Bones Doe ands lists them as male, while saying their age and race haven't been determined.
I wonder if the Trans Doe Task Force should get involved, then.
 
  • #47
This individual had a very close match on Gedmatch, I can’t stop thinking they has been identified by now
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
151
Guests online
1,828
Total visitors
1,979

Forum statistics

Threads
638,628
Messages
18,731,418
Members
244,498
Latest member
cjperry42019
Back
Top