Haha, that is the pic of the guy on the small window...lol.. I find that so funny. I am pretty sure somebody helped him up there. Why not show the first part?
The arrow to a 'scuff point' is proof of somebody climbing in? Did the defense forget to show this important piece of evidence?
The dust on the clothes are interesting but not decisive one way or the other. You are claiming it as fact that this is dust from the wall, but I am pretty sure that that is just your opinion. One side says a guy came up through the window and put the dust there. The other side says a guy/girl just went outside to get a big rock and the clothes were on the floor before breaking the window. The 2nd scenario is confirmed by the girl who actually lived in the room and testified on the situation in her own room.
All JMO.
You asked for a theory of how he got in the window. I gave it to you. It is plausible, which raises reasonable doubt. it's not my "opinion" on what those dust marks are on the clothes. It's the theory of another expert, and you're welcomed to read his entire theory on the links that have been posted on the past page or two in this thread.
To me, the most real part of it is, becomes the position of the rock, which has torn the shopping bag on its way into the room and landed half in the bag and half out. I'm not convinced someone staging a crime scene would place that rock on a bag and tear it and leave it half in the bag and half out. It is more logical for them to place it on the floor. There is also bits of the rock around the spot where it landed, proving that this is where is came to rest.
You might think someone helped the guy up to the window, but unless it's documented, we do not know how that guy got up to the window, or how Rudy got himself up to an office 15ft off the ground after breaking a window at another of his crime scenes. I do not know if the defense presented the scuff mark; however, the scuff mark is there, as people have been asking to see proof that someone was on the wall.
The illustration present a detailed and plausible way that Rudy got into the house. That creates reasonable doubt as to whether the scene was staged. Now, FR can say whatever she wants to say about how clean her room was, but we must agree that it is her opinion on what clean is. I'll tell you, my mom and I disagreed on what my idea of clean in my room was, but I'd swear to her that it was clean. I personally give less weight to what a person says versus what appears to be present, because people's memories are faulty, people not only made false confessions, but they've also been false witnesses against others. There are tons of studies about how someone will remember something incorrectly. So for me personally, I give less weight to people's actual statements on certain issues.
for example, FR could not be sure in what condition she left the shutters. So if she cannot be sure of that, I cannot be sure she's right about the condition in which she left the room. These are all minor details that no one thinks about when they are preparing to leave their house. I do not fault her, but I can understand how she might not recall correctly.
If you look at pictures of the glass spray, you will not see any glass stuck in the green shutters. This is because no glass hit them and got wedged, like a splinter. That means they were open when the rock flew. You also will see glass clear across the room tothe bedstand. The glass would not have flown backward at that force if it had been done inside the room.
If you look at the glass frame, you will see it's completely knocked out at the bottom as if someone had manually knocked it out. Look at other pictures of when an object hits a window and you will see that it does not perfectly knock 99% of the pieces out of the bottom, but creates shards. RG knocked those shards out manually to pull himself up. If you look closely at the glass, you can see pings in it where some glass was bent backward and broken off, as opposed to breaking the in direction it was originally struck toward.
Whether the glass was hit from inside or outside, we should see a little bit of glass outside. The investigators found none because they didn't look for it. Leaves had fallen that night and the glass should have been down beneath them either way. Once the perps opened the green shutters, if they'd been closed, enevitably, some glass would have fallen outside. This means that the breakin wasnt even thoroughly investigated to prove it false.
There are other notes I can make, too, and if you're interested, then I'll continue. As I said before, I have no dog in this fight, but i do not want to see someone railroaded. I DO want to see someone pay for Meredith.
I think it would be much clearer if we just stick with topics that are actually being discussed during the trials. JMO.
