Warren Jeffs FLDS compound in Texas surrounded by police #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
Maybe the women refuse to name the fathers or tell the state they do not know the father.

Then they don't get benefits. I guess I have just run out of compassion for all the poor me's out there. Let's start teaching personal responsiblity.

And YEA for the FLDS ladies who went to shelters, here is hoping they will one day be FORMER FLDS ladies. :)
 
  • #222
as a single mother of six the woman could be honest and get cash from our government. they do not legally marry wife 2,3,4,...7. all of these wives are single mothers. then the single mothers turn their checks over to their spiritual husband who turns it over to the church. the mothers own nothing. all the vehicles you mentioned are owned by the men or the church.

in this country people collect welfare while playing the system all the time. the deference here is how well organized the FLDS was at it.

Well, they could be honest with the exception that they are not admitting that they are living with the father of their children. If they did then they probably wouldn't be eligible because they would have to count the father's income. Also, I read an accusation somewhere that when they go to apply for welfare, that wife #1 can't apply. So when wife #2 goes to apply, she applies for her children and the children of wife #1. And the reason that welfare doesn't establish paternity for the children is because the women announce they don't know the name of the person they slept with. A ridiculous story agreed, but you cannot force someone to tell something they say they don't know.
 
  • #223
  • #224
For those of you that wanted to know how many woman went to shelters, Cnn is reporting 6 went to shelters.

Bless their hearts. i send strong vibes to them that they may stay strong.
 
  • #225
  • #226
  • #227
IMO if you are unmarried and having children while on Medicaid you are committing child abuse.
Children born into poverty statistically speaking do far worse in school than their counterparts who are not born into poverty.
If you can't afford the children you have and are dependent on the state or federal government then birth control should be mandatory for all receiving this aid. No other children conceived after your initial claim period can or should be covered at any time . This would put an end to the Medicaid Mama's who have no desire to get off the States dole outs.
The argument but my religion forbids me is answered with then let your church or religious affiliation pay for them. I made a mistake and got pregnant, my birth control failed, all this is an excuse. Making US citizens responsible for your own mistakes or failures shows a lack of responsibility on our own part. The US government cannot by law favor anyone because of their religion or religious choices. End of argument.
Frankly I can 't afford the taxes I already pay let alone a raise in taxes to cover a foundering social service agency that is not administrated with more sense than God gave an earthworm. The fact that these people live in a commune should have been a factor in the decision to
give them aid to begin with. The children all have fathers and if the mothers can't or won't name them then DNA testing should have been ordered of all possible fathers named by the women. No names no aid. Child support is now pursued by Texas when the children are on State aid programs.This needs to be implemented on a Federal level to prevent State aid jumping- going from one State to another to gain aid when you have exhausted funds in one. Mandatory job training and job seeking should also be a requirement. Give a man a fish and you feed him for today. Teach a man to fish and he will feed himself for a lifetime. Write letters to your government officials, put an end to this type of abuse and cults like this one can't flourish and spread.

:clap: :clap: :clap:
 
  • #228
IMO if you are unmarried and having children while on Medicaid you are committing child abuse.
Children born into poverty statistically speaking do far worse in school than their counterparts who are not born into poverty.
If you can't afford the children you have and are dependent on the state or federal government then birth control should be mandatory for all receiving this aid. No other children conceived after your initial claim period can or should be covered at any time . This would put an end to the Medicaid Mama's who have no desire to get off the States dole outs.
The argument but my religion forbids me is answered with then let your church or religious affiliation pay for them. I made a mistake and got pregnant, my birth control failed, all this is an excuse. Making US citizens responsible for your own mistakes or failures shows a lack of responsibility on our own part. The US government cannot by law favor anyone because of their religion or religious choices. End of argument.
Frankly I can 't afford the taxes I already pay let alone a raise in taxes to cover a foundering social service agency that is not administrated with more sense than God gave an earthworm. The fact that these people live in a commune should have been a factor in the decision to
give them aid to begin with. The children all have fathers and if the mothers can't or won't name them then DNA testing should have been ordered of all possible fathers named by the women. No names no aid. Child support is now pursued by Texas when the children are on State aid programs.This needs to be implemented on a Federal level to prevent State aid jumping- going from one State to another to gain aid when you have exhausted funds in one. Mandatory job training and job seeking should also be a requirement. Give a man a fish and you feed him for today. Teach a man to fish and he will feed himself for a lifetime. Write letters to your government officials, put an end to this type of abuse and cults like this one can't flourish and spread.

CNN has broadcast pictures of this fellow you might find one there.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Bravo!
 
  • #229
Link to evidence

Boy, for being out of touch with society and low-income, they sure have a lot of high-tech equipment! Lots of laptop computers, flash drives, Canon Powershot cameras... and why do the top brass get to drive vehicles???
 
  • #230
Boy, for being out of touch with society and low-income, they sure have a lot of high-tech equipment! Lots of laptop computers, flash drives, Canon Powershot cameras... and why do the top brass get to drive vehicles???

And why was Warren Jeffs driving a RED Escalade, wearing bermuda shorts, and carrying over $100,000 in cash when he was arrested?

What a hypocrite.
 
  • #231
Here ya go, I'm hosting it myself:
DaleBarlow.jpg

Yikes! Central Casting couldn't have picked a better "perv".
:eek:
 
  • #232
And why was Warren Jeffs driving a RED Escalade, wearing bermuda shorts, and carrying over $100,000 in cash when he was arrested?

What a hypocrite.

Come on now! It was God's will that he drive an Escalade.
 
  • #233
  • #234
  • #235
The thing to keep in mind about the 16 year old is if she was moved to another location, and still has access to a phone, the sect doesn't realize she's "Sarah". Otherwise she would be behind a locked door with nothing more than a mattress and blanket if even that. Since she supposedly still has access to a phone, I'm pretty sure the FLDS hasn't caught on to the fact she's Sarah. I've entertained the fact of her being able to hide a cell phone on her. But then she'd have to have a charger and enough time and place to be able to charge it without anyone noticing.
 
  • #236
CNN has just confirmed that even if they can't find the 16 year old who made the complaint, the warrent will NOT be thrown out. There is a "good faith" exception there!
 
  • #237
Imagine how teenage girls he rapes feel. monster! :(

I was thinking that too. This is definitely one instance where the ugliness on his outside match the ugliness on his inside.
 
  • #238
CNN has just confirmed that even if they can't find the 16 year old who made the complaint, the warrent will NOT be thrown out. There is a "good faith" exception there!

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
 
  • #239
I was thinking that too. This is definitely one instance where the ugliness on his outside match the ugliness on his inside.

:sick: :sick: :sick:
 
  • #240
CNN has just confirmed that even if they can't find the 16 year old who made the complaint, the warrent will NOT be thrown out. There is a "good faith" exception there!
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:

They certainly found probable cause once they entered the compound!

So when will you be headed there Ladybass? They had a hearing today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
2,863
Total visitors
2,930

Forum statistics

Threads
632,157
Messages
18,622,838
Members
243,038
Latest member
anamericaninoz
Back
Top