Warren Jeffs FLDS compound in Texas surrounded by police

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #341
Glow, you need to find and read Jon Krakauer's "Under the Banner of Heaven". It may change your mind about this crazy cult. I wouldn't call it a "religion" at all. Warren Jeffs and his ilk are just Jim Jones reincarnated. It's all about power.
 
  • #342
Glow, you need to find and read Jon Krakauer's "Under the Banner of Heaven". It may change your mind about this crazy cult. I wouldn't call it a "religion" at all. Warren Jeffs and his ilk are just Jim Jones reincarnated. It's all about power.


I would love to read it BarnGoddess, although I doubt it would change my mind as I view this cult as a negative already. Unless I am misunderstanding you and you are saying this would make me view this cult in a more positive light? :confused:

I will look for the book. Thank you for telling me about it.
 
  • #343
  • #344
I just thought this was interesting as the group has been splintering, splitting and setting up a variety of locations in different states over the past few years.

http://www.cortezjournal.com/asp-bi...e=news&article_path=/news/08/news080408_2.htm

The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints member who purchased a west Texas ranch from which nearly 200 people were removed over the weekend for alleged physical abuse has ties to two properties northwest of Mancos.
 
  • #345
Glow, it looks to me like you believe the parents should have more rights than the children. FWIW I feel exactly the opposite. When a child's rights bump up against an adult's rights, as might be interpreted in this case, then the child's rights should trump the adult. To often children have been treated as pawns in our society because they have no one advocating on their behalf. They have no money and can't vote, so their rights often have been ignored.

This case is ALL ABOUT THE CHILDREN AND THEIR RIGHT TO BE PROTECTED FROM ABUSE.

I applaud Texas and the county CPS for having the guts to step in and CARE about the welfare of these innocent children. And FWIW, I don't give a damn about the rights of the parents to raise their children in this cult.
Excellent post Pepper!:clap::clap::clap:
 
  • #346
It would be an additional burden because the welfare checks do not stop. They will be collecting while being detained, if "detained" is the correct word.
It would seem to me that these women are collecting the checks under fraudalent circumstances. They know where the father is. HE should be supporting ALL of his kids. Plus, the women should be on the OUTSIDE working REAL jobs and earning REAL paychecks...not submitting to their men to get their ticket to Heaven.
 
  • #347
  • #348
OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!

You gotthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1cTk2cJQac&NR=1a see this!
 
  • #349
  • #350
If there were reports of sexual and physical abuse and neglect, I think the children should have been taken separately no matter how much manpower it took. Those mothers have had time to threaten and intimidate the kids into not talking. Texas might allow a parent or guardian to take a child into an office to be interviewed, but not the ones who are reported for abuse. These kids have the same rights as any other Texas child. Also, these women wouldn't have been getting a welfare check, only foodstamps. There's not many here getting welfare checks. This bunch of freaks wouldn't have been trying to lie and say there's an absent father because they have to prove education, shot records, and have regular Texas Health Steps checkups or the check will be cut off. Food stamps doesn't require all that, just proof of income and a domicile form.
 
  • #351
  • #352
It would seem to me that these women are collecting the checks under fraudalent circumstances. They know where the father is. HE should be supporting ALL of his kids. Plus, the women should be on the OUTSIDE working REAL jobs and earning REAL paychecks...not submitting to their men to get their ticket to Heaven.


It is amazing that they were able to manipulate the welfare system in such a way. I know people who really need help and cant get it because such an eagle eye is kept on everything.

No eagle eye here apparently.
 
  • #353
Telling them I am taking your child and you can come if you want leaves a woman with very few options though doesn't it? IMO, in the case of suspected abuse, a mother should be thankful that ANY option is given.

Remember when America was a young country and civilization was pushing west? It wasn't long before the Indians were perceived as barbaric and their customs were strange and their hygiene was terrible and worst of all they didn't believe in Jesus. Most of the time they were slaughtered or driven away by the calvary. This was not deemed an immoral act because the land/country "belonged" to the government that the calvary worked for. In this mix there were also compassionate souls who wanted to "help" these Indians, bathe them, give them "decent" clothes to wear etc... basically the white man saw his way as "better" and the attempt to help was really to make the Indians more like themselves. So far, I haven't seen anyone trying to change their clothes, their hygiene, etc. Have I missed something? Nor have I seen any slaughter take place.

As for this situation today. I completely understand everyone's moral outrage at young girls being impregnated against their will. But if we set that aside for one minute, what else are these people doing wrong? Well there is the polygamy some might say. It is against the law. Do we know if these people have had legal marriages or just "religious" ones? If it is the latter, then they haven't broken the law of the land, they are just "living together" in the legal sense. Texas is a state that recognizes common law marriages. In order to be married under common law, you have to pass the following 3 tests:
Q: What makes a common law marriage?

  • A: Three elements must be present to form a common law marriage in Texas.
    • First, you must have "agreed to be married."
      Second, you must have "held yourselves out" as husband and wife. You must have represented to others that you were married to each other. As an example of this, you may have introduced you partner socially as "my husband," or you may have filed a joint income tax return.
      Third, you must have lived together in this state as husband and wife.
However, I don't really think the purpose of this has been to stop polygamy. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CHILDREN AND THEIR SAFETY.

But could there have been a way to do this with a little less "muscle"? Could the men who are still being "held" at the compound still have been "held" either at the compound or somewhere else completely separate from the rest of the community? Not without arresting them, under TX law. Until they have talked to the women and children, they are not going to arrest them - not constitutional. However, it IS constitutional to protect children against abuse. There were allegations made of sexual AND physical abuse.

They are the problem here after all. Sift through them and if some are still there who are guilty of impregnating these young girls, take them to jail. As for the other men there, who knows if the more moderate among these men could have been persuaded to come to some terms of agreement. Didn't I read that was what happened in the late 1800's with the mainstream Mormons? If it happened then it could happen again. At least the attempt could have been made. It didn't happen overnight, and if you think for one minute that the men would have just agreed to leave peacefully, or come to some form of "agreement" and then WOULD HAVE FOLLOWED IT, ..........??????????? Really? You believe that?

Offer all the women and girls that are deemed in "crisis" such as the young pregnant girls AND anyone else who WANTS to leave the opportunity to do so. Don't insist. Offer. Let the women and the small children who are definitely not in immediate danger have the choice to stay in their homes OR leave without using separation from their children to influence their choice. This would have been more quietly efficient if all we are really after here is correcting the under age sexual activity component. There were also allegations of physical abuse. Not just sexual abuse http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,5143,695267411,00.html

Thanks for responding to me Glow, and I am glad to hear what you have to say, just happen to disagree with much of it. I think you and I are going to have to agree to disagree on how this all went down, and hopefully agree on the end result, that the CHILDREN WERE PROTECTED.

I for one, and EXTREMELY grateful that this has happened. I think it has been a long time coming, I wish it had happened in AZ or UT, I wish other girls and children had been protected over the years, and I think that because of the "religious" connotation attached to the group, the authorities have taken the chickens*** way out for far too long and left too many children in the hands of pedophiles and child abusers.

WAY TO GO TX - I'M PROUD TO BE A TEXAN, AND SUPPORT THE LE AND CPS INVOLVED IN THIS 100%
 
  • #354
Linda7NJ, thanks for finding and posting the videos. They are a very good representation of what the life in a polygamist community is. I suspect though, the ones who have suffered even worse are too traumatized to share their experiences with anyone. And others can't talk simply because they are six feet under. KWIM?
 
  • #355
  • #356
  • #357
Thanks for responding to me Glow, and I am glad to hear what you have to say, just happen to disagree with much of it. I think you and I are going to have to agree to disagree on how this all went down, and hopefully agree on the end result, that the CHILDREN WERE PROTECTED.
[/B]


Well I was getting ready to address the points you mentioned but then I read the above and figured maybe you want to just let it stand where it is :crazy:

That is ok with me, hey! Its less typing right? I think this whole topic has spiraled into the emotional category for the general public at large. Maybe later when it is all played out people will want to look at the larger picture. I know that I will! Maybe, maybe not. We will see.

Thanks for the conversation Barb :blowkiss:
 
  • #358
I appreciate your polite response barb :blowkiss:

ok, By saying someone is "humanely" treated I think you and I agree that the women are being treated kindly and humanely now. I don't think anyone with them wants them hurt. In fact the ones helping these women and children see themselves as their "rescuers" and they very well may be in some of the cases. Telling them I am taking your child and you can come if you want leaves a woman with very few options though doesn't it?

Remember when America was a young country and civilization was pushing west? It wasn't long before the Indians were perceived as barbaric and their customs were strange and their hygiene was terrible and worst of all they didn't believe in Jesus. Most of the time they were slaughtered or driven away by the calvary. This was not deemed an immoral act because the land/country "belonged" to the government that the calvary worked for. In this mix there were also compassionate souls who wanted to "help" these Indians, bathe them, give them "decent" clothes to wear etc... basically the white man saw his way as "better" and the attempt to help was really to make the Indians more like themselves.

Well we all know how that ended.

As for this situation today. I completely understand everyone's moral outrage at young girls being impregnated against their will. But if we set that aside for one minute, what else are these people doing wrong? Well there is the polygamy some might say. It is against the law. Do we know if these people have had legal marriages or just "religious" ones? If it is the latter, then they haven't broken the law of the land, they are just "living together" in the legal sense. Also, they are not the only polygamists. I would be very surprised if the ones that were on the Oprah show last week get picked up and taken to shelters. As a matter of fact I would be willing to bet you that they will be left completely alone. So it must not be the "polygamy" aspect of all of this that is bothering people. The other thing that I think is concerning to all, is that these women live a lifestyle that offers no opportunity for change. This is the one that sparks so much sadness in all of us for them. They look so "worn" and beaten down. It makes us want to offer them something. That something is hope and options. After all America is the land of opportunity right? i could care less about the mothers. as a adult you have choices in life. they may have been hard or even horrible choices but they still handed their daughter over to these old men for sex. i can not set aside the abuse of the children because for me that is what this is about.

But could there have been a way to do this with a little less "muscle"? Could the men who are still being "held" at the compound still have been "held" either at the compound or somewhere else completely separate from the rest of the community? They are the problem here after all. Sift through them and if some are still there who are guilty of impregnating these young girls, take them to jail. As for the other men there, who knows if the more moderate among these men could have been persuaded to come to some terms of agreement. Didn't I read that was what happened in the late 1800's with the mainstream Mormons? If it happened then it could happen again. At least the attempt could have been made. i would have loved to have seen the men taken into custody. unfortunately the burden of proof to arrest a adult is higher than to take a child into temporary custody. the government had to follow the laws as currently written. i am sure if you ask the case workers or the officers on the scene they would much rather have rounded up all the men and taken them to jail immediately.

Offer all the women and girls that are deemed in "crisis" such as the young pregnant girls AND anyone else who WANTS to leave the opportunity to do so. Don't insist. Offer. the problem with just offering the children in crisis the option of leaving is that it leaves the children the option to stay with the only family they know even if it means the rapes will continue. the mothers have a choice to stay but can we really give a child the choice to stay in a home where we have evidence of on going sexual abuse?

Let the women and the small children who are definitely not in immediate danger have the choice to stay in their homes OR leave without using separation from their children to influence their choice. This would have been more quietly efficient if all we are really after here is correcting the under age sexual activity component. i do understand the basic idea behind this but i do not agree. when one child in the home is sexually abuse i feel all children should be removed. add to that the fact in this case it can be near impossible to tell what child belongs to a adult mother and what child belongs to a child bride.

If on the other hand obliterating a life style that most of us see as abhorrent and replacing it with one that more closely resembles our own is the goal, then I think everything is going according to plan. i do not find the idea of having multiple wives all that big of a deal. it is a common practice in some part of the world and i think of it as a cultural thing. once your way of life begins to accept child sex abuse i do find it abhorrent. adults may practice and marital choice they wish. child sex abuse under any reason including the claim of culture or religion should be wiped out.
all of the bolded junk is me.
 
  • #359
It is amazing that they were able to manipulate the welfare system in such a way. I know people who really need help and cant get it because such an eagle eye is kept on everything.

No eagle eye here apparently.

It's easy to manipulate the system if you know how. My sister worked at a clinic in a small town and she use to get so mad when women would drive up in their Mercedes and Jags with their hair and nails all done up and dressed in the lastest clothes and gold chains around their necks, dragging a couple of kids behind in their little Air Jordans and then get there doctor visits paid for by the tax payers. :mad:
 
  • #360
Well I was getting ready to address the points you mentioned but then I read the above and figured maybe you want to just let it stand where it is :crazy:

That is ok with me, hey! Its less typing right? I think this whole topic has spiraled into the emotional category for the general public at large. Maybe later when it is all played out people will want to look at the larger picture. I know that I will! Maybe, maybe not. We will see.

Thanks for the conversation Barb :blowkiss:

Hey, I'm always up for discussion on it Glow, just didn't know if you wanted to continue or not. As long as you know where I stand, and I know where you stand, we're okay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
3,463
Total visitors
3,582

Forum statistics

Threads
632,618
Messages
18,629,160
Members
243,220
Latest member
JJH2002
Back
Top