Hello Peeps! Finally caught up from yesterday's testimony. What a day for those who saw it live.
Guess on Monday we will hear what is going on with Ms. Wong, should be interesting. Isn't this more of what went on with JM and the autographing? Or is it about Juror #5?
ALV ordered back on Tues. I can't believe the judge told her Mon and Tues and she was trying to talk the judge into another day. She doesn't take the hint very well.
As for the public lynching of ALV. Initially I was one of the ones saying lets hear what she has to say, and felt that anything she brought up in favor of JA would be dispelled by JM. And that did happen. Pretty much, for me, she wasn't really credible and very biased. I get that all she was concerned with was the domestic violence portion buuuut, if you are going into open court and testifying that the victim was an abuser, you would think you would want concrete evidence of some nature such as friends saying they saw bruises or something. Not even interviewing people seems like she lacked a lot of foundation for her claims. I think JM did a good job of throwing out there that if she can say TA was a liar beause of a pattern, why she won't say JA was..there definitely is a proven pattern there. So I was happy with that line of questioning. The final juror question, well...imho it nailed it in the coffin when she said she has no idea of JA told anyone a different or inconsistent story, but JA's story to her was consistent. She showed again she had no proof that the story was even true, just consistently told to her. So, it wasn't a major win for JA or JM. Anyway, ALV is her own worst enemy. I agree with another who feels like she isn't lying per se, she sincerely believes in what she is saying. So, while I believe it leaves a lot to be desired and puts dv back about 20 years, she does believe it.
As we get closer to Demarte, I really feel like we will get a more clinical based testimony. Both RS and ALV let emotion rule the day iinstead of the facts. And while I understand the emotion, facts are the only thing the court/jury should be balancing in the deliberations.
The juror questions were interesting as always. They really expounded on JM's questioning but seemed to 'question' JW line of questioning. If that makes sense. There was a difference when I heard the questions as we got into JM part of cross.
I hope hope hope to see some of it on Monday. Until then I will be checking in here and reading what you all have to say. Thanks so much for the commentary and comments. It helps those of us unable to watch. And a side note, JA sure does a lot of moving around, fixing, messing with her hair, rolling her tounge in her mouth, looking, staring these days. Its starting to get to her.
K