kanzz
kanzz=kansas
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,272
- Reaction score
- 68
BBMNot wishing to re-visit the debacle of Karr, but one element still concerns me.
Was ML so committed to her free the Ramsey Three cause that she would (ab)use international law against a fantasist as a diversionary tactic? If not, there had to be at least one compelling reason to act.
If Karr came up with a detail beyond a reasonable guess, something that has not been revealed to the public, then where did he learn of the detail?
The logical trail is it had to be implied by Tracey > fed by Ramsey investigators > Ramsey legal advisors > the Ramseys.
So either the police in making disclosure to the Ramseys and their team - April 97? - effectively gave away their entire evidential case (and I believe it was too early on for that)
or the Ramseys knew something of which the police could assume only the killer would be aware.
All roads lead to Ram in this case.
Yes. She would have done anything... ANY-THING to close this case with an "intruder", take the focus off the Ramseys, and add a notch to her proverbial belt. And evidence in this case was leaked six ways from Sunday.
Tricia, our fearless leader, nailed it with her 08/27/2006 post.
"The D.A., knowing that Tracey has out and out lied in the past in his documentarys, went with Tracey's info anyway."