How do they know that Casey THE LIAR did not mean to cast suspicion on this woman, ZG of the Deposition, when they admit they have never met her, never written a check to her to cover daycare expenses, never spoke with her on the phone though stating they had numerous phone numbers, never driving to her home though stating they had many addresses, and what the woman looks like as compared to the woman sitting in front of them? They have only ONE person's say so as to whether THIS ZG was the woman who Casey says was not the babysitter, and Casey will not go on record as stating that she is not. Yet these people continue to assert that their lying daughter could not have stolen this woman's identity to use to blame for Caylee's disappearance and refuse to back up that statement with any possible means to demonstrate that Casey not only MEANT someone else, but that someone else actually EXISTED.
Mr. Morgan and ZG are not "going after" GACA. The Anthony's only want to say "that's not the one" and be done with it. Yet very real evidence exists that Casey DID mean this one because she thought she was innocuous enough, was expendable enough, and would deflect the truth that Casey herself is responsible for the disappearance and ultimate death of her daughter, Caylee.
Financial matters, daycare arrangements, food and clothing, transportation, relationships between parents and daughter, relationship between grandparents and granddaughter, relationship between husband and wife, all become material to the issue of whether Casey had the means and the wherewithall to support herself and her daughter, whether it caused familial stress and strife, and whether her daughter was exposed to said stress and strife, and whether or not the continued enabling of the 22 year old mother led to the death of Caylee Marie Anthony.
Perpetuating Casey's lies about having a nanny at all in the face of overwhelming evidence that one did not exist points directly back to Casey having stolen ZG's identity to implicate her. She just never thought someone would confront that and say "You cannot do that because there are repercussions." As we have seen, selfish acts for any of the Anthonys have never proven to glean any reliable repercussions. Mr. Morgan and his client may become the first to achieve the incredible: Force the Anthonys to face that they cannot just do what they want and expect others to roll over and take it.
I am one of those who in the beginning believed this to be a frivolous law suit. Not only have I changed my belief on that, I have also begun to believe she should get a group rate and sue the lot of them.
