What The Hell Is Going On Here??????????

Randy Simons
Photographer who took many of JonBenet's photos and sold the portfolio for $7,500. He is responsible for many of the images of JonBenet that have become so familiar. Simons was arrested October 16, 1998 in Genoa, Colorado, on suspicion of indecent exposure. He was arrested while walking down a residential street nude. He reportedly blurted out to the arresting deputy, "I didn't kill Jonbenet," and was sent to Denver University Hospital for a mental evaluation.

September 20, 1999
Dear Mr. Kane, I wish to talk with the grand jury about the subject of the book Presumed Guilty by Stephen Singular: various ways child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 and/or abuse could have been the original motive(s) for what became JonBenet's murder. One obvious possible connection with child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 is through JonBenet's pageant life. Pam Griffin, JonBenet's costume maker, says in the book (p.110) "One time Randy [Simons] wanted to shoot Kristine [Pam's daughter] nude, but I said absolutely not." There are other possible connections between the Ramseys and the child 🤬🤬🤬🤬/sex world that should be investigated. Keeping a lid on this ultimate taboo could mean death for a headstrong child like JonBenet who couldn't otherwise be silenced.
Child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 and abuse are deeply ingrained into Boulder society. Some evidence is:
The Child and Family Advocacy Program provides statistics that 204 Boulder County children under 20 were sexually abused in 1998. (Daily Camera 7/12/99, p. 1C)
"Parent of the Year" Zack Prendergast returns his award when it is found he had been a trainer for The Children of God, a cult which advocated sex from infancy. (Daily Camera 8/5/99, p. 3B)
Mr. Prendergast also runs fathering workshops. (Daily Camera 9/19/99, p. 1B)
First Baptist Church treasurer Jerry Berry is arrested for fondling 3 little girls. Police find albums of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 and seize 5 computers. (Daily Camera 8/14/99, p. 1B)
The popularity of the late poet, former Boulder resident and Naropa professor Allen Ginsberg, avowed members of NAMBLA, the North American Man/Boy Love Association, whose motto was "Sex by 8 or it's too late." ( www.nambla.org/ginsberg.htm )
There have been many other recent child sex abuse cases here, including several with the convicts in possession of JonBenet's photos, including Sean King. The above are all prominent people.
Related evidence includes:
The existence here at 1050 Walnut St. of a large 🤬🤬🤬 🤬🤬🤬🤬 media company, New Frontiers Media, now rapidly expanding (Daily Camera, business section, 7/21/99, 8/9/99, 8/18/99, 8/20/99) An acquaintance of mine says his former girlfriend had been drawn into this world.
SANE rape support program closes. "But two SANE nurses, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said many within the program were frustrated by the constant plea bargaining of Boulder County's sexual assault cases. "We've been operating for two years now and in that whole time, none of us have ever had to go to court to testify," one nurse said. "That's very concerning to us, that none of these cases are going to trial.'" (Daily Camera, 9/2/99, p. 1A)
All the referenced newspaper articles are available from me on request. The inability of the FBI to explain to former Denver DA and Lockheed-Martin executive Norm Early why they never took charge of the Ramsey case BBan apparent kidnapping of a top Defense contractor executive's daughter by foreign terrorists- is suspicious and an apparent violation of the "Lindbergh Law." Det. Linda Arndt stated on TV last week that she specifically asked for FBI assistance and did not receive it. She received no backup of any kind, having been told everyone was in a meeting for hours starting about 7:30 AM the day after Christmas. Were they in a meeting with or about the FBI?
Mr. McFarland has a contact with information that Lockheed-Martin security were in the Ramsey house before the BPD. We have available a video of Mr. Early discussing the issue on a recent TV show. John DeCamp, Esq., former Nebraska State Senator, in his book The Franklin Coverup describing the State of Nebraska's investigation into the failure of Omaha's Franklin Saving and Loan, shows that the FBI protected child molesters and killers and intimidated child victims and witnesses. One of Mr. DeCamp's former-child clients Paul Bonacci won a related $1,000,000 judgment against Larry King, the former president of Franklin, just this spring.
[In the rest of this version of the letter for the public, names have been replaced with 🤬🤬🤬, YYY and ZZZ. In the version for the DA, the real names were used and more details given. Evan Ravitz] The Singular book also concerns BBdisguised to avoid libel- Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, a highly ranked official in Boulder City government. Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 has admitted to two prominent and respected friends of mine that in 1991 a box of sex toys and 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 were found in his City Hall office during an office move that occurred when Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 was out. He further admitted that 3 women employed at City Hall alleged he harassed them, though none filed charges. I was in mediation with Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 when I learned these things, and that City Council had sent him to counseling. I asked who was paying for his therapy and he said that he was.
The late Ron Porter, when he was President of the Boulder Bar Association, moved to investigate Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, but apparently nobody would talk. There should be some record of this. I also have 3 names of eye-witnesses to what was in the Pandora's box. What we suspect is that Mr. 🤬🤬🤬' 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 was child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, for 3 reasons: Mr. YYY, then a City Hall administrator, after we talked 10 minutes on the subject in 1992, told me "He [Mr. 🤬🤬🤬] gives me the willies. I'll keep my kid away from him." He recently denied to me that he knows anything about Mr. 🤬🤬🤬. I received the enclosed anonymous letter in 1992. I gave the original to Det. Tom Wickman on May 5 this year when he and Mr. Trujillo interviewed Dr. McFarland and I. Mr. Porter would not be likely to start an investigation of Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 for the unpleasant but legal possession of non-child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. If Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 has possessed child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, he would want to keep the spotlight off other people's similar "peccadilloes." This is the "Belgian Syndrome" mentioned in Dr. McFarland's interview with Donald Freed. Because DA Hunter was on vacation incommunicado at the time of the murder he could not be contacted for advice on proceeding with the highest profile case ever here. The grand jury should determine if Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 was consulted. If indeed a network of highly-connected pedophiles exists here as in Belgium and France, Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 or others could have acted to keep (sincere) FBI investigators away.
A one-time "suspect" in this case told me he was shown a bookcase of videos in the home of prominent Boulder drug-case attorney Mr. ZZZ and told these were all child 🤬🤬🤬🤬. Mr. ZZZ left Boulder soon after the murder and moved to a monastery in Wyoming. Phone records of 🤬🤬🤬 and ZZZ should be examined for calls to FBI or Lockheed Martin numbers that morning. DA Hunter and the police might be reluctant to investigate Mr. 🤬🤬🤬. According to the Singular book (p. 90) Hunter said "If this got into the hands of certain people in the media it would further embarrass Boulder and make the town look worse than it already does. What are you going to do with this information?" You the outsider should exhaust all leads, this being a government of laws and not of men. Dr. McFarland and I have been careful not to libel Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 for 7 years. Once we saw the possible connection to the Ramsey case we worked with a reputable author for 2 years to get the story told right. We want to do the right thing and give more complete details to the grand jury. Sincerely, Evan Ravitz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 . "Kane's rejection letter to Evan"Posted by jameson on Oct-21-99 at 09:23 AM (EST)
THE STATE OF COLORADO TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ALEXANDER M. HUNTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY September 20, 1999 Mr. Evan Ravitz
1130 11th St #3 Boulder CO 80302 Re: Request to appear before the Boulder County Statutory Grand Jury
Dear Mr. Ravitz: After due consideration of your request to appear and testify before the Boulder County Grand Jury in the JonBenet Ramsey murder investigation, I wish to inform you that your request is denied. We have determined that your proposed testimony would not serve the interests of justice which is the controlling standard by which to judge your request. Your request discusses the existence of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 in Boulder County and suggests that there may be a link between that and the death of JonBenet Ramsey. You have not identified any nexus between that and the murder of JonBenet Ramsey, nor any reason to conclude that there might be one. Further, to the extent that one could possibly exist, you have no personal knowledge of any facts, apparently, to make the connection. In addition, you have stated that the grand jury should investigate the response of the FBI to the initial report that JonBenet was kidnaped by a foreign faction. This is not a proper subject for the grand jury to explore. Their mission is to determine, if possible, who killed the child.
A review of the FBI's role in the investigation would not further that goal, and would be more appropriately addressed to the United States Department of Justice Inspector General's Office. Finally, you state that you wish to inform the grand jury that a former city attorney in Boulder might have been in possession of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 in 1991, that he might have ad a motive to protect others in the city who engage in the same activity and he might have been consulted and presumably have steered authorities away from a child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 connection. You surmise this because Alex Hunter, the District Attorney, was not available to be consulted in the early days of the investigation. You offer no evidence to connect any of this chain of speculation together. I wish to advise you that you have a right to petition the Boulder District Court to review this Decision. The procedure is outlined in Colorado Revised statutes Section 16-5-204 (l) Very truly yours, Alexander M. Hunter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3 . "letter to Judge Bailin"Posted by jameson on Oct-21-99 at 09:25 AM (EST)
Judge Roxanne Bailin20th Judicial District6th & CanyonBoulder CO 80302 Dear Judge Bailin, This is my petition to the court for a hearing on the District Attorney's denial of my request to speak to the grand jury, as provided for by CRS 16-5-204 (l). I enclose my letter to Mr. Kane and his reply. [In this public version, a name and position have been disguised. The version to Judge Bailin contained the real name and position. BBEvan Ravitz] I was stunned to discover that Mr. Kane had not carefully read my letter. He refers (last paragraph, 1st page) to "a former city EMPLOYEE" when my letter clearly names "Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, City EMPLOYEE of Boulder," a position he still holds BBand held at the time of JonBenet Ramsey's murder, which is how he might have influenced the case. Apparently Mr. Kane has read the chapters of the book Presumed Guilty that Dr. McFarland and I innocently sent to the grand jury, which, to avoid libel, disguise Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, and refer to him in an ambiguous way, from which one could mistakenly infer his position was "former." Further Mr. Kane (2nd paragraph) says "You have not identified any nexus between that [child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬] and the murder of JonBenet Ramsey." I did, clearly, in the first 2 paragraphs of my letter. Pam Griffin has publicly stated that JonBenet's pageant photographer Randy Simons had requested her daughter Kristine to participate in a child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 session, whether or not she was allowed to talk about this to the grand jury. Mr. Kane states (3rd paragraph) "This [the FBI no-show] is not a proper subject for the grand jury to explore. Their mission is to determine, if possible, who killed the child." The citizens have waited 2 :: years and spent 2 million dollars and we don't know who killed her, possibly because the DAs refuse to look in the yawning pandora's box we and others have opened. The "mission" of justice should also be to prevent more children from being raped and/or killed. Just as we must investigate not just "who sold drugs" but how they were imported, who else profited -and who was paid to look away- so we must, as circumstances demand, find out not just "who killed JonBenet" but what motives and other illegal activities led to the murder, so history doesn't repeat itself! Truth, you will remember, was also found in Pandora's Box. Finally, Kane writing his response the same day I hand-delivered my letter (September 20th), not even having read it carefully, hardly shows "due consideration of [my] request to appear and testifyYY" It seems to me that the prosecutors have pre-determined that the investigation will not broach these subjects even if someone gets away with murder. If you are party to such an agreement, I pray for you. Sunshine will be the best antiseptic. To summarize: I've made a strong case that prominent people in Boulder are involved in pedophilia. Pam Griffin states that JonBenet's photographer was involved. I've made a circumstantial case that pedophilia exists at the highest level in the Boulder justice system. The FBI no-show is evidence that legal procedure has been corrupted in this case BBapparently constituting related crime that has effectively destroyed the investigation of this murder.. Only the citizens can be impartial in a case in which the legal machinery has been corrupted. Keeping we citizens from the citizens of the grand jury seems to violate CRS 16-5-204 (l) which states "any person may approach the prosecuting attorney or the grand jury and request to testify in an inquiry before a grand jury or to appear before a grand jury." (emphasis added) Sincerely, Evan Ravitz1130 11th St. #3Boulder CO 80302


Yeah - just your regular everyday photographer.

Now if you can only prove THAT HE wrote the RN, instead of Patsy....

I don't believe Pam Griffin's story...what sort of photographer would actually ASK a mother, if they could photograph their young daughter in the nude? Or for her to participate in a Child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 session? Sounds fishy to me. He wouldn't have asked the mother for permission...he would have just figured out a way to do it.
 
]I really cannot understand all this fuss, over crudely drawn heart. Kids write or draw on their hands, arms, legs etc, all the time. I know I did and I bet that you all did also. [/COLOR]

However, with Ames, it was probably to write little memos to herself, such as "that pencil case on my desk, is definately out of place!"

Sure they do...and that is our point. Patsy at first says that she notices it, even commenting on how well drawn it is, and then (I believe after speaking with John about it, who told investigators that the intruder did it, because he was trying to taunt them)...she changes her story. And, as I have said before...John blames it on the intruder. I have to agree with you on this one...I think that either she drew it, or Daphne, her little friend drew it.

I tried hard not too...but I had to laugh at your last sentence. Nah, I just drew on myself, too.
 
According to Trish who runs Forums for Justice, the light was off that morning. She is a virtual expert on this. So Callan please check out her site. She has everything but everything on the case.

Thanks Solace...I knew that there was proof somewhere, that the light was actually off.
 
Now if you can only prove THAT HE wrote the RN, instead of Patsy....

I don't believe Pam Griffin's story...what sort of photographer would actually ASK a mother, if they could photograph their young daughter in the nude? Or for her to participate in a Child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 session? Sounds fishy to me. He wouldn't have asked the mother for permission...he would have just figured out a way to do it.

Forget Pam Griffin, I don't believe Stephen Singular. His theories are on a par with Evening2 and Eagle at Crime Library, and I am pretty sure that if those two don't get some help really soon, they will be speaking in tongues before the year is out.

Callan, we are trying to deal in reality here.
 
Thanks Solace...I knew that there was proof somewhere, that the light was actually off.

There are some super-good links at the FFJ site. The videos of Patsy and John on the Larry King Live show are especially good (the videos of them alone with King). I think they under "media links only" in one of the "sticky" topics.
 
There are some super-good links at the FFJ site. The videos of Patsy and John on the Larry King Live show are especially good (the videos of them alone with King). I think they under "media links only" in one of the "sticky" topics.

The site is just great.
 
Randy Simons
Photographer who took many of JonBenet's photos and sold the portfolio for $7,500. He is responsible for many of the images of JonBenet that have become so familiar. Simons was arrested October 16, 1998 in Genoa, Colorado, on suspicion of indecent exposure. He was arrested while walking down a residential street nude. He reportedly blurted out to the arresting deputy, "I didn't kill Jonbenet," and was sent to Denver University Hospital for a mental evaluation.

September 20, 1999
Dear Mr. Kane, I wish to talk with the grand jury about the subject of the book Presumed Guilty by Stephen Singular: various ways child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 and/or abuse could have been the original motive(s) for what became JonBenet's murder. One obvious possible connection with child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 is through JonBenet's pageant life. Pam Griffin, JonBenet's costume maker, says in the book (p.110) "One time Randy [Simons] wanted to shoot Kristine [Pam's daughter] nude, but I said absolutely not." There are other possible connections between the Ramseys and the child 🤬🤬🤬🤬/sex world that should be investigated. Keeping a lid on this ultimate taboo could mean death for a headstrong child like JonBenet who couldn't otherwise be silenced.
Child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 and abuse are deeply ingrained into Boulder society. Some evidence is:
The Child and Family Advocacy Program provides statistics that 204 Boulder County children under 20 were sexually abused in 1998. (Daily Camera 7/12/99, p. 1C)
"Parent of the Year" Zack Prendergast returns his award when it is found he had been a trainer for The Children of God, a cult which advocated sex from infancy. (Daily Camera 8/5/99, p. 3B)
Mr. Prendergast also runs fathering workshops. (Daily Camera 9/19/99, p. 1B)
First Baptist Church treasurer Jerry Berry is arrested for fondling 3 little girls. Police find albums of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 and seize 5 computers. (Daily Camera 8/14/99, p. 1B)
The popularity of the late poet, former Boulder resident and Naropa professor Allen Ginsberg, avowed members of NAMBLA, the North American Man/Boy Love Association, whose motto was "Sex by 8 or it's too late." ( www.nambla.org/ginsberg.htm )
There have been many other recent child sex abuse cases here, including several with the convicts in possession of JonBenet's photos, including Sean King. The above are all prominent people.
Related evidence includes:
The existence here at 1050 Walnut St. of a large 🤬🤬🤬 🤬🤬🤬🤬 media company, New Frontiers Media, now rapidly expanding (Daily Camera, business section, 7/21/99, 8/9/99, 8/18/99, 8/20/99) An acquaintance of mine says his former girlfriend had been drawn into this world.
SANE rape support program closes. "But two SANE nurses, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said many within the program were frustrated by the constant plea bargaining of Boulder County's sexual assault cases. "We've been operating for two years now and in that whole time, none of us have ever had to go to court to testify," one nurse said. "That's very concerning to us, that none of these cases are going to trial.'" (Daily Camera, 9/2/99, p. 1A)
All the referenced newspaper articles are available from me on request. The inability of the FBI to explain to former Denver DA and Lockheed-Martin executive Norm Early why they never took charge of the Ramsey case BBan apparent kidnapping of a top Defense contractor executive's daughter by foreign terrorists- is suspicious and an apparent violation of the "Lindbergh Law." Det. Linda Arndt stated on TV last week that she specifically asked for FBI assistance and did not receive it. She received no backup of any kind, having been told everyone was in a meeting for hours starting about 7:30 AM the day after Christmas. Were they in a meeting with or about the FBI?
Mr. McFarland has a contact with information that Lockheed-Martin security were in the Ramsey house before the BPD. We have available a video of Mr. Early discussing the issue on a recent TV show. John DeCamp, Esq., former Nebraska State Senator, in his book The Franklin Coverup describing the State of Nebraska's investigation into the failure of Omaha's Franklin Saving and Loan, shows that the FBI protected child molesters and killers and intimidated child victims and witnesses. One of Mr. DeCamp's former-child clients Paul Bonacci won a related $1,000,000 judgment against Larry King, the former president of Franklin, just this spring.
[In the rest of this version of the letter for the public, names have been replaced with 🤬🤬🤬, YYY and ZZZ. In the version for the DA, the real names were used and more details given. Evan Ravitz] The Singular book also concerns BBdisguised to avoid libel- Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, a highly ranked official in Boulder City government. Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 has admitted to two prominent and respected friends of mine that in 1991 a box of sex toys and 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 were found in his City Hall office during an office move that occurred when Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 was out. He further admitted that 3 women employed at City Hall alleged he harassed them, though none filed charges. I was in mediation with Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 when I learned these things, and that City Council had sent him to counseling. I asked who was paying for his therapy and he said that he was.
The late Ron Porter, when he was President of the Boulder Bar Association, moved to investigate Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, but apparently nobody would talk. There should be some record of this. I also have 3 names of eye-witnesses to what was in the Pandora's box. What we suspect is that Mr. 🤬🤬🤬' 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 was child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, for 3 reasons: Mr. YYY, then a City Hall administrator, after we talked 10 minutes on the subject in 1992, told me "He [Mr. 🤬🤬🤬] gives me the willies. I'll keep my kid away from him." He recently denied to me that he knows anything about Mr. 🤬🤬🤬. I received the enclosed anonymous letter in 1992. I gave the original to Det. Tom Wickman on May 5 this year when he and Mr. Trujillo interviewed Dr. McFarland and I. Mr. Porter would not be likely to start an investigation of Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 for the unpleasant but legal possession of non-child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. If Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 has possessed child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, he would want to keep the spotlight off other people's similar "peccadilloes." This is the "Belgian Syndrome" mentioned in Dr. McFarland's interview with Donald Freed. Because DA Hunter was on vacation incommunicado at the time of the murder he could not be contacted for advice on proceeding with the highest profile case ever here. The grand jury should determine if Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 was consulted. If indeed a network of highly-connected pedophiles exists here as in Belgium and France, Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 or others could have acted to keep (sincere) FBI investigators away.
A one-time "suspect" in this case told me he was shown a bookcase of videos in the home of prominent Boulder drug-case attorney Mr. ZZZ and told these were all child 🤬🤬🤬🤬. Mr. ZZZ left Boulder soon after the murder and moved to a monastery in Wyoming. Phone records of 🤬🤬🤬 and ZZZ should be examined for calls to FBI or Lockheed Martin numbers that morning. DA Hunter and the police might be reluctant to investigate Mr. 🤬🤬🤬. According to the Singular book (p. 90) Hunter said "If this got into the hands of certain people in the media it would further embarrass Boulder and make the town look worse than it already does. What are you going to do with this information?" You the outsider should exhaust all leads, this being a government of laws and not of men. Dr. McFarland and I have been careful not to libel Mr. 🤬🤬🤬 for 7 years. Once we saw the possible connection to the Ramsey case we worked with a reputable author for 2 years to get the story told right. We want to do the right thing and give more complete details to the grand jury. Sincerely, Evan Ravitz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 . "Kane's rejection letter to Evan"Posted by jameson on Oct-21-99 at 09:23 AM (EST)
THE STATE OF COLORADO TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ALEXANDER M. HUNTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY September 20, 1999 Mr. Evan Ravitz
1130 11th St #3 Boulder CO 80302 Re: Request to appear before the Boulder County Statutory Grand Jury
Dear Mr. Ravitz: After due consideration of your request to appear and testify before the Boulder County Grand Jury in the JonBenet Ramsey murder investigation, I wish to inform you that your request is denied. We have determined that your proposed testimony would not serve the interests of justice which is the controlling standard by which to judge your request. Your request discusses the existence of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 in Boulder County and suggests that there may be a link between that and the death of JonBenet Ramsey. You have not identified any nexus between that and the murder of JonBenet Ramsey, nor any reason to conclude that there might be one. Further, to the extent that one could possibly exist, you have no personal knowledge of any facts, apparently, to make the connection. In addition, you have stated that the grand jury should investigate the response of the FBI to the initial report that JonBenet was kidnaped by a foreign faction. This is not a proper subject for the grand jury to explore. Their mission is to determine, if possible, who killed the child.
A review of the FBI's role in the investigation would not further that goal, and would be more appropriately addressed to the United States Department of Justice Inspector General's Office. Finally, you state that you wish to inform the grand jury that a former city attorney in Boulder might have been in possession of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 in 1991, that he might have ad a motive to protect others in the city who engage in the same activity and he might have been consulted and presumably have steered authorities away from a child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 connection. You surmise this because Alex Hunter, the District Attorney, was not available to be consulted in the early days of the investigation. You offer no evidence to connect any of this chain of speculation together. I wish to advise you that you have a right to petition the Boulder District Court to review this Decision. The procedure is outlined in Colorado Revised statutes Section 16-5-204 (l) Very truly yours, Alexander M. Hunter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3 . "letter to Judge Bailin"Posted by jameson on Oct-21-99 at 09:25 AM (EST)
Judge Roxanne Bailin20th Judicial District6th & CanyonBoulder CO 80302 Dear Judge Bailin, This is my petition to the court for a hearing on the District Attorney's denial of my request to speak to the grand jury, as provided for by CRS 16-5-204 (l). I enclose my letter to Mr. Kane and his reply. [In this public version, a name and position have been disguised. The version to Judge Bailin contained the real name and position. BBEvan Ravitz] I was stunned to discover that Mr. Kane had not carefully read my letter. He refers (last paragraph, 1st page) to "a former city EMPLOYEE" when my letter clearly names "Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, City EMPLOYEE of Boulder," a position he still holds BBand held at the time of JonBenet Ramsey's murder, which is how he might have influenced the case. Apparently Mr. Kane has read the chapters of the book Presumed Guilty that Dr. McFarland and I innocently sent to the grand jury, which, to avoid libel, disguise Mr. 🤬🤬🤬, and refer to him in an ambiguous way, from which one could mistakenly infer his position was "former." Further Mr. Kane (2nd paragraph) says "You have not identified any nexus between that [child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬] and the murder of JonBenet Ramsey." I did, clearly, in the first 2 paragraphs of my letter. Pam Griffin has publicly stated that JonBenet's pageant photographer Randy Simons had requested her daughter Kristine to participate in a child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 session, whether or not she was allowed to talk about this to the grand jury. Mr. Kane states (3rd paragraph) "This [the FBI no-show] is not a proper subject for the grand jury to explore. Their mission is to determine, if possible, who killed the child." The citizens have waited 2 :: years and spent 2 million dollars and we don't know who killed her, possibly because the DAs refuse to look in the yawning pandora's box we and others have opened. The "mission" of justice should also be to prevent more children from being raped and/or killed. Just as we must investigate not just "who sold drugs" but how they were imported, who else profited -and who was paid to look away- so we must, as circumstances demand, find out not just "who killed JonBenet" but what motives and other illegal activities led to the murder, so history doesn't repeat itself! Truth, you will remember, was also found in Pandora's Box. Finally, Kane writing his response the same day I hand-delivered my letter (September 20th), not even having read it carefully, hardly shows "due consideration of [my] request to appear and testifyYY" It seems to me that the prosecutors have pre-determined that the investigation will not broach these subjects even if someone gets away with murder. If you are party to such an agreement, I pray for you. Sunshine will be the best antiseptic. To summarize: I've made a strong case that prominent people in Boulder are involved in pedophilia. Pam Griffin states that JonBenet's photographer was involved. I've made a circumstantial case that pedophilia exists at the highest level in the Boulder justice system. The FBI no-show is evidence that legal procedure has been corrupted in this case BBapparently constituting related crime that has effectively destroyed the investigation of this murder.. Only the citizens can be impartial in a case in which the legal machinery has been corrupted. Keeping we citizens from the citizens of the grand jury seems to violate CRS 16-5-204 (l) which states "any person may approach the prosecuting attorney or the grand jury and request to testify in an inquiry before a grand jury or to appear before a grand jury." (emphasis added) Sincerely, Evan Ravitz1130 11th St. #3Boulder CO 80302


Yeah - just your regular everyday photographer.

So what if Randy was caught running wild. He was nuts. No argument about that.

Stephen Singular is a wastral at best. He is a parasite who made money off the death of JB. There is no pedofile ring involved in this death and Santa Claus and his wife are innocent also. Contrary to what Eagle and Evening would love for us to believe.

This is family murder Callan. It is a murder of a child by a mother who was aided and abetted by the father in covering it up and the family is fairly wealthy. And I bet if we got Burke under hypnosis, he would say he heard his mother screaming.

The Ramseys just love the Stephen Singulars of world; takes all the suspicion off them.
 
I really can't understand all the fuss over your apparent belief Randy Simons killed JonBenet.
indeed,if there was any way TR and the R's could have pinned it on him,on ANYBODY,for that matter,they would have.I think they would have sent any of their former friends to prison,or even to the death chamber,in order to pin it on an 'intruder'.
 
The Ramseys just love the Stephen Singulars of world; takes all the suspicion off them.

they might as well have made a Stephen King novel or movie (Oh yea,they did...DOI) from it.
 
Randy Simons
Yeah - just your regular everyday photographer.
Photographer Randy Simons was specifically recommended to Patsy Ramsey because he could make a six-year-old girl look like twenty in his photos. So does it surprise you that this guy was somehow weird and had pedophilic tendencies?
But no forensic evidence links him to JonBenet's death. And didn't he also have an airtight alibi?

jmo
 
I really can't understand all the fuss over your apparent belief Randy Simons killed JonBenet.


I never said, that I believe he killed her. I stated that a rope used in a photo of her, matched one that appeared to have been brought to the house and just placed in the guest bedroom.

You indicated that there was no problem with him, so I posted what I did.

It was suggested that he was involved in a child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 group. If true, he could be the tip of an iceberg.

The fact is, Boulder seems to be a place that makes Twin Peaks - look like Disney World.
 
What's your point?

You have only proved that all of the rooms were full of junk...making it even harder to manage to get around in the dark.

You stated, that the 'junk' - was outside the wine cellar.
 
I never said, that I believe he killed her. I stated that a rope used in a photo of her, matched one that appeared to have been brought to the house and just placed in the guest bedroom.

You indicated that there was no problem with him, so I posted what I did.

It was suggested that he was involved in a child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 group. If true, he could be the tip of an iceberg.

The fact is, Boulder seems to be a place that makes Twin Peaks - look like Disney World.

I think you have me confused with another poster, Callan. Post #138 in this thread is the only time I've commented on Simons and that comment was a response to an earlier post you made.

JonBenet's injuries and the known circumstances of the scene are not consistent with what is known about pedophilia homicides. What evidence connects Simons to the scene or to the crime? I don't know of any is why I'm asking.

Also, Patsy had similar rope put on the tree in John Andrew's bedroom and she stated she also used it to decorate outside for a fall theme involving a scare crow (if I remember correctly). We have similar rope at my home as well and I'd venture some of our neighbors do too. It really isn't viable evidence to produce a picture and imply the photographer was involved because there was a hemp rope in the photo and hemp rope in the Ramsey home. Obviously, Patsy is the one who selected the red shirt and overall outfit for the photo shoot. Maybe Patsy brought the rope to the photo session as a prop. In my opinion, she probably did along with the clothing JonBenet wore.
 
yes,I've read all about Randy Simons,and guess what ? (and btw,nobody said RS was normal) ...but he didn't do it.Just like Santa didn't do it,FW didn't do it, PW didn't do it,etc...

Is there any reason you *really think the R's are innocent? this seems to be a personal contest for you,so I'm wondering what the real agenda is...


Hmm, let me think.

UNKNOWN DNA mixed with her blood, in her underwear.
UNKNOWN DNA under her fingernails.
Pubic hair, from UNKNOWN person.
UNKNOWN animal hairs.
UNKNOWN fibres.
Fresh UNKNOWN footprints, found next to her body.

So apparently, one or both of the Ramsey's carried out this frenzied attack, yet not ONE of the above pieces of evidence, can be linked to them{?}

Not possible.

In fact, the police were so desparate, they decided to try a little 'trickery' in the hope that Patsy Ramsey would crack.

Look at this.

TOM HANEY: And I told you then
6 that I wouldn't lie to you. And I don't have
7 any reason to lie to you.
8 PATSY RAMSEY: Great.
9 TOM HANEY: And I didn't lie to you
10 about the information, this medical information
11 that I told you about.
12 PATSY RAMSEY: Okay, this is very
13 hurtful.
14 TOM HANEY: I know that. And if I
15 told you right now that we have in the process
16 of being examined trace evidence that appears to
17 link you to the death of JonBenet, what would
18 you tell me?
19 PATSY RAMSEY: That's totally
20 incredible. (INAUDIBLE).
21 TOM HANEY: How is it impossible?
22 PATSY RAMSEY: I did not kill my
23 child. I didn't have a thing to do with it.
24 TOM HANEY: And I am not talking,
25 you know, somebody's guess or some rumor or some
0593
1 story.
2 PATSY RAMSEY: I don't care what
3 you're talking about.
4 TOM HANEY: I am talking about
5 scientific evidence.

I wonder where that all went?

Another thing about this, Patsy Ramsey gets angry and her voice suddenly cracks with emotion. How the hell could she fake something like that?
 
RICK FRENCH/JOHN RAMSEY/FLEET WHITE

Three people, who all went down to the basement alone.

Three people who say or do something down there, which appears odd .


RICK FRENCH stated that he went into the basement looked around, but he did not look in the wine cellar, because the "top latch was on".

JOHN RAMSEY stated that he went into the basement early on and that a chair had been placed directly outside the door to the 'train room'. For reason or reasons unknown, he also -did not look in the wine cellar.

FLEET WHITE stated that he went into the basement and that the light was already switched on. He actually DID look in the wine cellar, but stated that he could not find the light switch, which obviously indicates, that the basement light was not sufficient to see inside.


According to records, police arrived at the house first, followed shortly, by the Whites and others.

Again, according to records, Rick French was the first to go to the basement alone. Next was Fleet White and then John Ramsey.

It is therefore logical to assume that the 'mystery chair placement' was either done by French, White, or a third party.

You could argue that it was put there by French, to provide a DIY evidence seal of the room, but this appears to be very unlikely.

There does not appear to be any reason why White would place it there.

That would leave a third party, but this also appears to be very unlikely, due to the fact that White never stated that a chair was blocking the door, when he entered the 'train room'.

Weirder and weirder!



Putting all this together, provides some interesting observations.

For example, some people would find it very strange, that a police officer would do a search of a room, looking for clues, but would not slide a latch across, so that he could look in 'another' room. Some people will wonder why he said that the door was latched, when John Ramsey stated that the latch on that particular door - was never usually left latched.

Some people would also find it very strange, that a fresh footprint next to JonBenet's body, was of a shoe type, issued to police officers.

Some people would also find it strange, that the police investigation into this crime, was so bad, that it would just be impossible to happen, in 'normal' circumstances.



Some people will find it strange, that White did not mention to John Ramsey, that he had previously been down to the basement.

Some people, would find it strange, that White stated that he was unable to see into the wine cellar, because he could not switch on the light in there. Suggesting that the light in the basement, was not illuminating the interior of the wine cellar.

3 TOM HANEY: Let me just stop you
4 there. When you pushed the door open, was there
5 a light on in the room?
6 PATSY RAMSEY: There was -- her
7 lamp light was not on. You know, there was
8 enough light that I could tell she wasn't in her
9 bed.

Hmm.



Some people will find it strange, that John Ramsey did not look in the wine cellar, on his first search.
 
RICK FRENCH/JOHN RAMSEY/FLEET WHITE

Three people, who all went down to the basement alone.

Three people who say or do something down there, which appears odd .


RICK FRENCH stated that he went into the basement looked around, but he did not look in the wine cellar, because the "top latch was on".

JOHN RAMSEY stated that he went into the basement early on and that a chair had been placed directly outside the door to the 'train room'. For reason or reasons unknown, he also -did not look in the wine cellar.

FLEET WHITE stated that he went into the basement and that the light was already switched on. He actually DID look in the wine cellar, but stated that he could not find the light switch, which obviously indicates, that the basement light was not sufficient to see inside.


According to records, police arrived at the house first, followed shortly, by the Whites and others.

Again, according to records, Rick French was the first to go to the basement alone. Next was Fleet White and then John Ramsey.

It is therefore logical to assume that the 'mystery chair placement' was either done by French, White, or a third party.

You could argue that it was put there by French, to provide a DIY evidence seal of the room, but this appears to be very unlikely.

There does not appear to be any reason why White would place it there.

That would leave a third party, but this also appears to be very unlikely, due to the fact that White never stated that a chair was blocking the door, when he entered the 'train room'.

Weirder and weirder!



Putting all this together, provides some interesting observations.

For example, some people would find it very strange, that a police officer would do a search of a room, looking for clues, but would not slide a latch across, so that he could look in 'another' room. Some people will wonder why he said that the door was latched, when John Ramsey stated that the latch on that particular door - was never usually left latched.

Some people would also find it very strange, that a fresh footprint next to JonBenet's body, was of a shoe type, issued to police officers.

Some people would also find it strange, that the police investigation into this crime, was so bad, that it would just be impossible to happen, in 'normal' circumstances.



Some people will find it strange, that White did not mention to John Ramsey, that he had previously been down to the basement.

Some people, would find it strange, that White stated that he was unable to see into the wine cellar, because he could not switch on the light in there. Suggesting that the light in the basement, was not illuminating the interior of the wine cellar.

3 TOM HANEY: Let me just stop you
4 there. When you pushed the door open, was there
5 a light on in the room?
6 PATSY RAMSEY: There was -- her
7 lamp light was not on. You know, there was
8 enough light that I could tell she wasn't in her
9 bed.

Hmm.



Some people will find it strange, that John Ramsey did not look in the wine cellar, on his first search.

Callan,
Which all suggests either everyone involved failed to discover JonBenet for one reason or another, or, JonBenet was never originally in the winecellar, being placed there at a later point in the morning?

You left out that although Fleet White was there when JonBenet was discovered, and he was told to stay away from the wine-cellar after going upstairs, he returned to check something out?

Patently something he did not see earlier, or did he?

.
 
You know Callan, I started following this case about 6 months in as here in the UK there wasnt obviously as much coverage as in the US and in all the years since I believed an intruder did it BUT over the last 12 months my opinions have changed-partly through reading these forums and partly my own common sense.Whilst I disagree with certain conclusions reached and feel a lot of discussions go on about largely irrelevant points on the whole I cannot disagree with the opinion Patsy did it.What I feel happened is this:

After a long,tiring day JonBenet falls asleep in the car on the way home from the Whites,whether she then walks in or was carried is beside the point I feel as at some point she was awake,she possibly woke when Patsy was changing her clothes.JB is then hungry so Patsy gives her the pineapple and either her or Burke have the tea.JR and BR play with his toys and Patsy puts the pillow at the foot of JBs bed and lets her watch a video whilst Patsy is down the hall packing for the trip.At some point she checks JB,sees she has fallen asleep and wet the bed.Tired,stressed,infuriated she sees red and grabs JB,a tussle ensues causing the curtain tie back to come loose and the hair ties to be knocked over.During the struggle she flings JB round hard and hits her head on the bedpost of the spare bed (take a look at the shape of those and how they curve outwards).JB is unconscious so Patsy lifts her onto the bed,gets John,they get Burke to bed and out of the way.PR and JR go downstairs to the kitchen,Patsy uses the tissues as she is crying.JR goes into CEO mode and they form the plan to pass it as a kidnapping gone bad.All the pertinent equipment is gathered,some perhaps rejected eg the rope,they go upstairs and JR carries JB down the spiral stairs to the cellar getting garland strands in her hair on the way down.They lay her outside the WC and fashion the garrote,strangling her with it and inserting the paintbrush inside her.Patsy writes the RN by which time time has run out and they call 911 and we all know what followed.

I realise of course this is a simplistic version of what probably happened but I would think its a logical version and JMHO.:twocents:
 
You know Callan, I started following this case about 6 months in as here in the UK there wasnt obviously as much coverage as in the US and in all the years since I believed an intruder did it BUT over the last 12 months my opinions have changed-partly through reading these forums and partly my own common sense.Whilst I disagree with certain conclusions reached and feel a lot of discussions go on about largely irrelevant points on the whole I cannot disagree with the opinion Patsy did it.What I feel happened is this:

After a long,tiring day JonBenet falls asleep in the car on the way home from the Whites,whether she then walks in or was carried is beside the point I feel as at some point she was awake,she possibly woke when Patsy was changing her clothes.JB is then hungry so Patsy gives her the pineapple and either her or Burke have the tea.JR and BR play with his toys and Patsy puts the pillow at the foot of JBs bed and lets her watch a video whilst Patsy is down the hall packing for the trip.At some point she checks JB,sees she has fallen asleep and wet the bed.Tired,stressed,infuriated she sees red and grabs JB,a tussle ensues causing the curtain tie back to come loose and the hair ties to be knocked over.During the struggle she flings JB round hard and hits her head on the bedpost of the spare bed (take a look at the shape of those and how they curve outwards).JB is unconscious so Patsy lifts her onto the bed,gets John,they get Burke to bed and out of the way.PR and JR go downstairs to the kitchen,Patsy uses the tissues as she is crying.JR goes into CEO mode and they form the plan to pass it as a kidnapping gone bad.All the pertinent equipment is gathered,some perhaps rejected eg the rope,they go upstairs and JR carries JB down the spiral stairs to the cellar getting garland strands in her hair on the way down.They lay her outside the WC and fashion the garrote,strangling her with it and inserting the paintbrush inside her.Patsy writes the RN by which time time has run out and they call 911 and we all know what followed.

I realise of course this is a simplistic version of what probably happened but I would think its a logical version and JMHO.:twocents:
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
16,462
Total visitors
16,632

Forum statistics

Threads
623,961
Messages
18,475,359
Members
240,610
Latest member
TyeM
Back
Top