Brefie said:
How can the mother of a family of 4 (total) look at handwriting and 'not remember' who it belongs to.
Try again, Patsy.
Truer words never spoken.
It's not like the questioning was 50 years later, or there might have been 20 relatives to choose from ... either John, Patsy, Burke or JonBenet wrote in Burke's album. Hmmm, let's see, I think we can eliminate John and JonBenet, so that leaves Patsy and Burke.
Now, how many little boys do you know who write captions in photo albums?
How many mothers do you know who write captions in photos albums?
That's what I thought.
Mothers are the ones who take the time to write captions (cute or otherwise) in photo albums ... little boys couldn't care less. I'm the one who does it in our family, and other women I know are the ones who do it in their families.
Patsy was artistic and she liked to document things ... she had a journalism background. Writing "cute captions" in first person for Burke's album would have been almost second nature for her. She was very much into the
presentation of things ... of herself, her family, her home.
Now, back to Brefie's comment ...
Obviously, Patsy lied when she told investigators she "didn't know" who wrote the captions in Burke's album. Duh. It was either her or Burke.
How many of you could not tell the difference between your young son's handwriting and your own? How many of you could not remember who had access to, and who wrote in, your young son's photo album?
So why did Patsy lie? Why couldn't she have just said, "Oh, it was me."
Answer: Because Patsy knew where the line of questioning was headed, and she knew the handwriting in the album was similar to the handwriting in the ransom note. She had printed both of them ... neither one was written in cursive. It was damning evidence, and she knew it.
IMO