here is a pretty general overview:
In addition to these reasons, which may have exceptions, if the attorney is not key to the defense i think they can leave without much trouble.
When an Attorney Must or May Withdraw Mid-Case
Lawyers.comsm
As the client, you have an almost absolute right to hire and fire your attorneys for any reason you choose (or for no reason whatsoever). Your attorney, on the other hand, cannot "fire" you as a client at whim; he must have a valid reason. The exact rules that govern attorneys vary from state to state, but in general, an attorney is required to withdraw from a case in the following situations:
Otherwise, an attorney may withdraw from a case only for valid reasons, and only if it is shown that the client's interests won't be adversely effected. Valid reasons include:
- If, by representing the client, the lawyer will be violating the law or the rules of professional conduct (such as if the lawyer is suspended from practicing law by the local attorney disciplinary committee).
- If the lawyer is physically or mentally incapable of representing the client.
[*]If the client terminates his relationship with the attorney.
http://research.lawyers.com/When-an-Attorney-Must-or-May-Withdraw-Mid-Case.html
- Conflicts of interest: Attorneys and their firms are not permitted to represent people or companies that are adversaries. In some circumstances, the lawyer may ask for permission (called a conflict waiver) from each party acknowledging the conflict and allowing the attorney to represent both of each. If, after the attorney has agreed to represent you, he learns that he or his firm also represents another person or company that is your adversary, and if the attorney can't get a conflict waiver from both you and your adversary, then the lawyer must stop representing you.
[*]Client consent: If you give your attorney permission to withdraw from the case, then the attorney can stop representing you.
[*]Differing case strategies: Sometimes lawyer and client won't agree on the best approach for handling a case. If you and your attorney are unable to reach agreement, then the attorney should withdraw.
[*]A client's failure to cooperate, communicate, or fulfill obligations: In order for an attorney to provide quality service to his client, there needs to be regular communication and interaction between the attorney and client. Your attorney may need you to answer questions, provide documentation and otherwise assist him so that he can give the service that you need and deserve. If, as a client, you fail to respond to your attorney's legitimate requests, then he cannot provide you with quality representation, and may be permitted to withdraw from your case.- Personality conflicts: It's human nature that sometimes people just can't get along with one another. Your attorney is supposed to be your best advocate, but if there's a conflict of personalities, it may be impossible for your attorney to give you the best representation possible.
- A client's failure to pay attorneys fees: As the client, you may have signed a contract when you hired your attorney, and that contract probably outlined the anticipated cost of your legal work, and your obligation to pay your attorney. You are hiring an attorney to perform a service, and if you fail to pay for those services, then the attorney usually has the right to stop working on your behalf. (This is true even if you don't have a signed contract.)
- A client's unethical, fraudulent, or criminal activity: Your lawyer is bound by certain professional and ethical obligations. As part of those obligations, your lawyer cannot help you commit unethical, fraudulent or criminal activities. If your attorney tells you that you're trying to do something illegal and you don't take his advice, the attorney can stop representing you.
I think JB's ego was crushed when JS stated in a backward sorta way that he was not the lead attorney, by advising JB to confer with AL.
bbm
Seems there would be valid reasons for the client AND the lawyer to end their relationship (for lack of a better word) ... I'm wondering how this works in Florida, but it looks like Lyon could walk away if she could not convince KC to take her advice ???
[*]If the lawyer is physically or mentally incapable of representing the client
I agree with you 100%. It certainly would cause a long delay finding another attorney who would take on this case.
Big time lawyers???? We're talking Baez here - he was scrounging around the County Jail looking for business before this case came along!
If push came to shove between JB and AL, I can see AL getting all huffy and leaving. IMO JB ain't going nowhere. He has been there from the start and will finish this case come hell or high water. I think JB possesses a very thick skin and a certain amount of sticktoitness, which AL doesn't have. AL strikes me as a person who cannot take criticism or dissent, is much more egocentric than JB and also thinks she is a cut above everyone else. If the going gets tough, AL will head for the hills kicking up much dust.
If anyone noticed, during the hearing JB made a lame joke about a reasonable bond solving the problem. AL's head spun to the left, locking eyes with the attorney standing behind JB. She looked incredulous that he would make such a stupid joke. The other attorney took her by the arm to whisper something to her. I thought she wanted to belt JB.
If you taped the hearing, go back and play in slo mo the little scenario when JB made the comment. I was cracking up. JB's little "joke" fell flatter than a pancake under a steamroller.
If anyone noticed, during the hearing JB made a lame joke about a reasonable bond solving the problem. AL's head spun to the left, locking eyes with the attorney standing behind JB. She looked incredulous that he would make such a stupid joke. The other attorney took her by the arm to whisper something to her. I thought she wanted to belt JB.
If you taped the hearing, go back and play in slo mo the little scenario when JB made the comment. I was cracking up. JB's little "joke" fell flatter than a pancake under a steamroller.
Do you have an approximate time and link to the video you are reviewing? I would love to see this! TIA
I think JB's ego was crushed when JS stated in a backward sorta way that he was not the lead attorney, by advising JB to confer with AL.
I think the remark JB made to JS about giving KC a bond on the fraud charges was proof he missed quite a few classes at law school. I'm sure AL gave him one of her lectures on how to conduct yourself in a court of law.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.