Don't "Hey, Dave!" me. You said you wanted me to rub it in, and that's exactly what I'm doing.
I don't have much to say about this.
I didn't think you would. Not that you NEED to, because it pretty much says it all.
I guess the case did meet the Ham test at least.
You want that ham sandwich to go with your words?
This case doesn't mean as much to me anymore until they start releasing more information.
Don't you mean BECAUSE they've released more information? Between this and Jim Kolar's new book, RDI has landed some serious body blows.
I guess I would have to say that Alex was kind of forced into those GJ proceedings.
I've been telling you that for years.
Even still, the Scheck's and Henry Lee's advised him not to indict at that current time.
Roy, they advised him not to indict because they could see he wasn't UP TO IT. They could see that an inert bureaucrat who hadn't taken a case to trial in ten years didn't have what it took to match the power and sheer underhandedness of Hal Haddon in court. Alex was more interested in maintaining his win/loss record and his upcoming retirement than he was in at least TRYING to get some damn justice for a murdered child.
And to that end, Alex Hunter is symbolic of the entire problem with our political system: God forbid that an elected official who's getting rich on our money should have to do any WORK!:furious: