IF it turns out she was raped, then an autopsy would have shown this. If they dismember the body, that evidence goes away. (In their twisted way of thinking)
JMO IMO :cow:
IF it turns out she was raped, then an autopsy would have shown this. If they dismember the body, that evidence goes away. (In their twisted way of thinking)
JMO IMO :cow:
I think it was effective, as plans go. Obscure the COD and what can you really be charged with? Pretty well thought out in my mind.
They knew that someone was going to come looking for Zahra eventually. She was on the radar of quite a few people, not to mention DSS. Apparently thing had gotten to the point where they could not cart her around anymore if you believe the decomp hits by the dogs.
Scatter her to the 4 winds and hope that you can claim she died a natural death which they were "afraid" to report. It probably seemed like a good idea at the time.
It takes a lot of stones to take someone apart-especially a child. I would love to know if either of them grew up on a farm? You have to be able to detach yourself I would think.
The only reason to dismember that makes any sense to me is to conceal whatever evidence the body might have provided, be it molestation/rape, physical abuse, or a combo of both.
JMO
..it has been noted that those wedding pics that included zahra, in the blue dress, weren't of E&A's wedding, but one previously.
..she is so adorable in those pics, i bet she had a great time and danced the night away...
..it has been noted that those wedding pics that included zahra, in the blue dress, weren't of E&A's wedding, but one previously.
..she is so adorable in those pics, i bet she had a great time and danced the night away...
IF it turns out she was raped, then an autopsy would have shown this. If they dismember the body, that evidence goes away. (In their twisted way of thinking)
JMO IMO :cow:
I too have wondred about the dismember thing - why? It just makes no sense to me. I read someplace they they may have used a wood chipper on part of it - well I would think they would have put the whole body (sorry for even thinking this) through the wood chipper. Seems it would have been easier to discard with a bunch of yard type materials. There was a lady who worked on a clean up crew in my area, got her sleeve caught and it pulled her thru the chipper, they was not much left of her. So very sad to think of wht this child had to go thru duing her life to be treated like this in death. I am not decided if she died of natural causes or someone killed her and I cannot imagine her dad not knowing why she stayed in her room all the time or at least not checking to see if she wanted something, moody or not.
One of the questions I have regarding dismembering poor Zahra's precious little body is why go to the trouble; the added mess and added likelihood of creating, and leaving more evidence in the home (where the dismemberment took place), only for EB to flip so quickly and reveal where the body parts were disposed of. JMO - but to me, the individual who actually performed the dismemberment, who went to this length to conceal COD and/or discovery of the body, would have held out longer, if not entirely, from revealing where the body parts were disposed of. JMO though ~
Since the only dismemberment that has been made public at this time is the one bone found at Christy Rd, I tend to agree with you that it may have been just her amputated leg that was dismembered from the rest of her. Of course the topic of this thread and the big question is why?
Considering that this bone and the gel liner were found in an area known for dumping, and not buried, it leads me to wonder if this was not part of the "kidnapping" plan gone wrong. If LE had believed the kidnapping plot, they would be searching for a missing child. If an amputated limb, complete with gel liner were found rather quickly by someone who was dumping something in the same area, then it would be known that Zahra was deceased at the hands of the "kidnappers". AB and EB would then be grieving parents of a murdered child and the search for the rest of Zahra's remains would have been centered around that same area. They never would have been found there and the whole case would likely have gone cold.
Just another theory.
MOO
Until we know what type of dismemberment actually ocurred I think it's hard to say.
I just made myself sick looking at pictures of dismembered bodies, and it's usually the limbs and head that are dismembered.
So unless it was an atypical type of dismemberment (not that there's any kind that I find normal) I can't really see it being done to hide evidence of sexual abuse. Think about what that would entail. I just can't go there unless there is evidence to support it.
Convenience in disposal/making it more difficult for the body to be identified are the only things I see as being a viable theory atm.... Or that possibly someone got a kick out of it. :sick:
If it's true that there are only two dump sites, then it's possible that the job was started, but they realised how difficult it would be, and gave up mid-job.
Why go to the trouble of dismembering a body then dump most of it in one location, and one piece in another?
I guess I should stop trying to apply any logic in this case because none of it makes sense.
MOO