- Joined
- Apr 11, 2019
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 7
because James Kolar's most compelling piece of evidence, the train track, is wrong. It's like Lou Smit and the stun gun--easily debunked.
In what way do you consider it debunked?
because James Kolar's most compelling piece of evidence, the train track, is wrong. It's like Lou Smit and the stun gun--easily debunked.
I’m thinking that patsy was up packing after she thought everyone else had went to bed...Patsy stayed up to feed JonBenet pineapple, hang her, then smash her head to send her to the next world.
I am not anywhere near as knowledgeable about the case as a lot of you so have mercy on me but on the night of the homicide, Patsy would have been weak from having undergone chemo. Also, in the CBS series demo, the child who plays Burke is repeatedly striking a skull replica that remains upright and immobile. The actor wails on the faux skull continuously until he gets the desired result and again, the skull replica doesn't topple.
Wouldn't the only adult male who was present in the home be the one most likely to have had the physical strength to have delivered the head blow?
I am not anywhere near as knowledgeable about the case as a lot of you so have mercy on me but on the night of the homicide, Patsy would have been weak from having undergone chemo. Also, in the CBS series demo, the child who plays Burke is repeatedly striking a skull replica that remains upright and immobile. The actor wails on the faux skull continuously until he gets the desired result and again, the skull replica doesn't topple.
Wouldn't the only adult male who was present in the home be the one most likely to have had the physical strength to have delivered the head blow?
Steve Thomas, Linda Arndt, Lou Smit and James Kolar all had access to evidence in this case, yet the all came to different theories/conclusions; I.e.,Patsy, John, intruder, and Burke, respectively. I feel like Mr. Kolar is the most logical, and that the other three became too emotionally involved. I think everything John did and continues to do is to protect himself. Even a hint of inappropriate sexual conduct, even if untrue, is a stigma he needed to fight at all costs. I don’t think he hit or sexually abused JonBenét. I do think he became involved late in the game and redressed JonBenét, thus sealing his fate to keep all the secrets hidden forever. He is covering for himself, patsy and Burke, all who were involved in this tragedy to some extent. This family was privileged and dysfunctional. I’m sure patsy and John suffered terribly after JonBenét’s death. They did what they felt they had to do to keep their remaining family intact, whatever would keep them out of jail. Lawsuits, false accusations, manipulation. Maybe Burke doesn’t even know the full story..he could be the sexual abuser and/or the one that struck the blow to the head..heck, maybe none of the three knew the whole sequence of events-maybe they wanted it that way. Poor JonBenet never had a chance. She was on borrowed time.
In addition I don't think John is good for this for this. There would have been prior issues in his past. People don't become sex offenders overnight, they're made when the aforementioned sex offender is a child. There would have been earlier signs in John's past.
Well she's no Faith Bacon. That's for sure.
No idea why PR would feel it's okay to dress a child, or herself as a burlesque dancer.
She never made the connection?
How do you know he didn't have a history of sex abuse? Especially during this time incest was not a topic that was spoken about. With his oldest daughter dead there is no way to know if she had also been sexually abused.
Because this is the most documented crime in the history of the world, we would have heard about it. The one on the plane with JAR would have been as well.