Why I Think The Arrest Was So Close To Patsy Ramseys Death

[Kimmer]

nevermind like the other poster said they are damed if they do and damed if they dont, I think the ramseys did cooperate with LE but maybe not as fast as some of them would have liked, I cant even imagine losing my only daughter let alone have LE pointing the finger at me and my husband, let me tell you one of the hardest things for a marriage to survive is the lose of a child but they still held there marriage toghether for 10 years,

I guess all of the info that proved and intruder is just out the window (no pun intended) a foreign pubic hair in her underware, hair under the tape on her mouth, a palm print that has not been identified, and dna under jonbenet fingernails that couldnt be placed on anyone, but you all still think just like the media did several years ago, I hope when this case is truly over and the proper person weather it be John Karr or not that some of you will be able to look at this in a little more unbias way.

and if you look at the beginning of my post I stated that I thought the Ramseys had something to do with it in the beginning until I looked at the evidence, if all you do is listen to the media wagon you will never get a straight answer they are ran by the Govmt and trust me if the Govmt wants to bury you they and the media will

just my 2 cents

 

[Nuisanceposter]

No offense, Kimmer, if that evidence is what you're going by, no wonder you think the Rs are innocent.

When was a pubic hair found in JB's undies? I know fibers consistent with the shirt her father John wore that evening were found in her undies and on her pubic area, but have never heard of a hair.

Same with the tape. Fibers consistent with Patsy's jacket were found on the tape, but I have not heard of a hair. They were also found those fibers in the paint tray and TIED into the knot at the back of JonBenet's neck.

The palm print was identified as belonging to Melinda Ramsey. There's a thread about it.

The DNA under her nails was degraded and its integrity compromised by the coroner's office failing to use a sterile set of clippers for each fingernail. They were known to even use the same clippers on different people's nails.

 

[BloodshotEye]

Maybe after PR died, the timing was such, that JMKarr was no longer able to use this particular personna to grandstand for attention. I also believe that he "absorbed her identity" to the extent that he could grieve for JBR, as a mother would. When PR died, he no longer had this mode of comfort. It required him to "move on". The question would be...to what.

I speculate that JMKarr used PR's personna, much the same way he used other "personnas" for his twisted sense of gratification. I am referring to what appears to have been posts he made by assuming various identies. E.g. pretending to be PR, posting as someone who knew the murderer, and as an intellectual who can communicate with a "professor". This ment that there was no one to grovel for clues (see the Annie Muss thread) or shower him with questions and sympthy (see the PR letters thread), or engage him in what he might have believe to be communiques from a "fellow" intellectual. *Hacking up fur ball, at the mention of the last one*...

JMKarr seemed to have been getting a lot of satisfaction by engaging people in a discussion about the JBR case; perhaps even posting as PR. If the emails that Tracey received (portions of text has been printed in recent newspapers) can be proven to have been written by JMKarr, there are a number of people here (myself included) that believe JMKarr very well may have been posting as PR, as well as Annie Muss.

JMKarr pretty much played out the Annie Muss character rather quickly. When PR died, he could no longer post as PR.

And to make matters worse, Tracey was pissing him off. JMKarr seemed to be very angry about Tracey's disclosure that he had a photo of JMKarr. Tracey is an idiot to have divulged this info.

I speculate that JMKarr is a slow burn, if he is getting a lot of attention. If he is not, he goes to a very dark place. My guess is that he sent one or two last emails to that wing-nut journalism "professor" Tracey. Perhaps the tone of the emails changed. Something significant. Whereas he might have been content to play child-like guessing games (e.g. guess what I know) in the past, his email may have taken a very intolerant or angry tone. May have been a signal that he would lash out at a child.

Not sure that it is PR's death that was the trigger, but rather a series of connected events.