I'm trying to sort out how, if at all, the two perps were influenced by Slenderman & related sites and communications the two had at those sites.
I can understand that a couple 12 y/o girls reading and chatting online could somehow be influenced or 'inspired' ---
--- to spontaneously carry out 'social infractions' e.g. prank calls, TP a house.
--- to spontaneously commit a lesser crime, e.g. shoplifting, or joyriding.
--- to plan and execute a lesser crime.
--- to plan and execute a series of lesser crimes.
--- to spontaneously commit assault & battery against a random stranger.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against a random stranger.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against an acquaintance.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against a classmate.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against a classmate-friend.
We do not know if these 2 girls did any of the above previously, with or without any internet influence.
I cannot imagine two 12 y/o's planning to violently murder a classmate-friend, plans they considered for months.
From LE's release of the two girls' statements, they admitted to---
---planning the death for months,
--- a violent death,
--- not just a random stranger, not an acquaintance, not a classmate-only,
--- a classmate with whom they socialized for months, perhaps actual friend,
then
--- nearly succeeded in executing the plan, w some improvisation,
---instructed victim w 19 stab wounds to stay where she was,
---told victim they would send help, but failed to do so,
then
--- both admitted the above to LE,
--- both blamed or said they were influenced by Slenderman sites.
---one (or both?) felt no remorse.
I can understand how would two 12 y/o's do this --- if they had been held captive at gunpoint.
Short of that or a similarly extreme external factor,
it's difficult to imagine what would influence them to plan a violent murder of their classmate-friend and nearly succeed in killing her.
JM2cts and I may be wrong.
I can understand that a couple 12 y/o girls reading and chatting online could somehow be influenced or 'inspired' ---
--- to spontaneously carry out 'social infractions' e.g. prank calls, TP a house.
--- to spontaneously commit a lesser crime, e.g. shoplifting, or joyriding.
--- to plan and execute a lesser crime.
--- to plan and execute a series of lesser crimes.
--- to spontaneously commit assault & battery against a random stranger.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against a random stranger.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against an acquaintance.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against a classmate.
--- to plan and commit a series of A & B against a classmate-friend.
We do not know if these 2 girls did any of the above previously, with or without any internet influence.
I cannot imagine two 12 y/o's planning to violently murder a classmate-friend, plans they considered for months.
From LE's release of the two girls' statements, they admitted to---
---planning the death for months,
--- a violent death,
--- not just a random stranger, not an acquaintance, not a classmate-only,
--- a classmate with whom they socialized for months, perhaps actual friend,
then
--- nearly succeeded in executing the plan, w some improvisation,
---instructed victim w 19 stab wounds to stay where she was,
---told victim they would send help, but failed to do so,
then
--- both admitted the above to LE,
--- both blamed or said they were influenced by Slenderman sites.
---one (or both?) felt no remorse.
I can understand how would two 12 y/o's do this --- if they had been held captive at gunpoint.
Short of that or a similarly extreme external factor,
it's difficult to imagine what would influence them to plan a violent murder of their classmate-friend and nearly succeed in killing her.
JM2cts and I may be wrong.